Ki Hong Choi, Danbee Kang, Junwoo Seo, Ji Hyun Cha, Taek Kyu Park, Joo Myung Lee, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Juhee Cho, Jeong Hoon Yang
{"title":"Geographic Access to Care and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Ki Hong Choi, Danbee Kang, Junwoo Seo, Ji Hyun Cha, Taek Kyu Park, Joo Myung Lee, Young Bin Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung-Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Juhee Cho, Jeong Hoon Yang","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Timely access to advanced care is critical for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), yet the impact of regional disparities in hospital arrival time on mortality remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether regional disparities in hospital arrival time are associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality among patients with CS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based, nationwide cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary hospitals in South Korea, using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and regional hospital accessibility indicators from the Korea Transport Institute.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 80,263 adults (≥ 18 yr) admitted to an ICU with a diagnosis of CS between 2017 and 2022. The study population was stratified by estimated hospital arrival time using region-level average daytime travel times (< 10, 10-30, 30-60, and > 60 min) for the present study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, including in-hospital and post-discharge mortality. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median estimated hospital arrival time was 9.15 minutes. In-hospital mortality increased progressively with longer arrival times: 29.6% (< 10 min), 33.5% (10-30 min), 34.9% (30-60 min), and 38.8% (> 60 min). Compared with less than 10 minutes, the adjusted odds ratios for in-hospital mortality were 1.27 (95% CI, 1.23-1.32), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.14-1.35), and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.29-1.75), respectively. At 1-year follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.16 (95% CI, 1.14-1.19 for 10-30 min), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.21 for 30-60 min), and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19-1.43 for > 60 min), relative to less than 10 minutes. These associations were consistent in both de novo and acute-on-chronic CS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longer hospital arrival times are significantly associated with increased in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with CS. These findings underscore the need for system-level interventions, such as regionally coordinated shock networks and early prehospital triage, to ensure timely access to definitive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2625-2635"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Timely access to advanced care is critical for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), yet the impact of regional disparities in hospital arrival time on mortality remains unclear.
Objectives: To investigate whether regional disparities in hospital arrival time are associated with in-hospital and long-term mortality among patients with CS.
Setting: Tertiary hospitals in South Korea, using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and regional hospital accessibility indicators from the Korea Transport Institute.
Participants: A total of 80,263 adults (≥ 18 yr) admitted to an ICU with a diagnosis of CS between 2017 and 2022. The study population was stratified by estimated hospital arrival time using region-level average daytime travel times (< 10, 10-30, 30-60, and > 60 min) for the present study.
Interventions: None.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, including in-hospital and post-discharge mortality. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess associations.
Results: Median estimated hospital arrival time was 9.15 minutes. In-hospital mortality increased progressively with longer arrival times: 29.6% (< 10 min), 33.5% (10-30 min), 34.9% (30-60 min), and 38.8% (> 60 min). Compared with less than 10 minutes, the adjusted odds ratios for in-hospital mortality were 1.27 (95% CI, 1.23-1.32), 1.24 (95% CI, 1.14-1.35), and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.29-1.75), respectively. At 1-year follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause mortality were 1.16 (95% CI, 1.14-1.19 for 10-30 min), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.21 for 30-60 min), and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.19-1.43 for > 60 min), relative to less than 10 minutes. These associations were consistent in both de novo and acute-on-chronic CS.
Conclusions: Longer hospital arrival times are significantly associated with increased in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with CS. These findings underscore the need for system-level interventions, such as regionally coordinated shock networks and early prehospital triage, to ensure timely access to definitive care.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.