Walter Toro Jimenez, Min Yang, Wei Song, Esteban Lemus Wirtz, Dongni Ye
{"title":"Longitudinal Dosing Patterns and Treatment Costs Among Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Initiating Nusinersen and Risdiplam.","authors":"Walter Toro Jimenez, Min Yang, Wei Song, Esteban Lemus Wirtz, Dongni Ye","doi":"10.1007/s12325-026-03687-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder historically associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Disease-modifying therapies have improved outcomes, but their long-term economic burden remains uncertain. Nusinersen and risdiplam, both chronic therapies, differ from onasemnogene abeparvovec, a one-time gene therapy. Understanding real-world treatment costs of chronic SMA therapies is critical to inform therapeutic choice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used the Komodo Health Research Database (2016-2024). Patients with SMA aged ≥ 2 years who initiated nusinersen or risdiplam were followed up to 5 years. Dosing patterns and drug acquisition and administration costs (2024 USD) were assessed annually, overall and by age group and scoliosis status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3864 eligible patients, 2743 initiated nusinersen and 1121 initiated risdiplam (mean age 21.4 vs. 25.3 years, respectively; 51.5% vs. 46.1% male). Median follow-up was 5.5 years for nusinersen and 1.1 years for risdiplam. Persistence declined over time, with 39.5% of patients treated with nusinersen and 63.7% of patients treated with risdiplam remaining on their index therapy at years 5 and 4. Patients treated with nusinersen received 3.6 injections on average in year 1 and 2.8-3.1 annually thereafter. Median annualized nusinersen treatment costs were $504,173 in year 1 and $438,788-548,608 in years 2-5. Patients treated with risdiplam had a median of 96 days of supply in year 1 (51.5% with > 90 days); median annualized drug costs were $143,331 overall in year 1 and $259,419 among those with > 90 days of supply, increasing to $264,701-289,340 in years 2-4. Costs were similar across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nusinersen and risdiplam persistence declined over time. Among patients remaining on their index therapy, both treatments had high long-term costs, highlighting the substantial and ongoing financial burden of chronic SMA therapies and the need for real-world evidence to inform healthcare planning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT07378943.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-026-03687-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder historically associated with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Disease-modifying therapies have improved outcomes, but their long-term economic burden remains uncertain. Nusinersen and risdiplam, both chronic therapies, differ from onasemnogene abeparvovec, a one-time gene therapy. Understanding real-world treatment costs of chronic SMA therapies is critical to inform therapeutic choice.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the Komodo Health Research Database (2016-2024). Patients with SMA aged ≥ 2 years who initiated nusinersen or risdiplam were followed up to 5 years. Dosing patterns and drug acquisition and administration costs (2024 USD) were assessed annually, overall and by age group and scoliosis status.
Results: Among 3864 eligible patients, 2743 initiated nusinersen and 1121 initiated risdiplam (mean age 21.4 vs. 25.3 years, respectively; 51.5% vs. 46.1% male). Median follow-up was 5.5 years for nusinersen and 1.1 years for risdiplam. Persistence declined over time, with 39.5% of patients treated with nusinersen and 63.7% of patients treated with risdiplam remaining on their index therapy at years 5 and 4. Patients treated with nusinersen received 3.6 injections on average in year 1 and 2.8-3.1 annually thereafter. Median annualized nusinersen treatment costs were $504,173 in year 1 and $438,788-548,608 in years 2-5. Patients treated with risdiplam had a median of 96 days of supply in year 1 (51.5% with > 90 days); median annualized drug costs were $143,331 overall in year 1 and $259,419 among those with > 90 days of supply, increasing to $264,701-289,340 in years 2-4. Costs were similar across subgroups.
Conclusion: Nusinersen and risdiplam persistence declined over time. Among patients remaining on their index therapy, both treatments had high long-term costs, highlighting the substantial and ongoing financial burden of chronic SMA therapies and the need for real-world evidence to inform healthcare planning.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.