European agricultural pest management practices following the Green Deal - gaps and challenges.

IF 3.7 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Frontiers in insect science Pub Date : 2026-07-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/finsc.2026.1901258
Adalbert Balog, Hugh D Loxdale, Artúr Botond Csorba, Sándor Keszthelyi
{"title":"European agricultural pest management practices following the Green Deal - gaps and challenges.","authors":"Adalbert Balog, Hugh D Loxdale, Artúr Botond Csorba, Sándor Keszthelyi","doi":"10.3389/finsc.2026.1901258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Green Deal, the main aim of which is to substantially change the agricultural production systems through the Farm to Fork (F2F) Strategy, has caused the most significant reconsideration of pest management in the European Union (EU) in a generation. Since 2020, several regulatory and policy measures have affected pest management decisions, including revised risk assessment procedures for plant protection products, restrictions on certain emergency derogations, updated rules facilitating microbial biological control agents, and the integration of IPM (Integrated Pest Management)-related measures into the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) eco-schemes. At the same time, implementation has been challenging. The proposed Sustainable Use Regulation (SUR), which aimed to introduce binding pesticide reduction targets and additional restrictions in sensitive areas, was withdrawn in 2024 following political disagreement within the EU Commission and concerns regarding implementation feasibility. As a result, pesticide governance remains primarily based on the Sustainable Use Directive (SUD), national action plans, and CAP-supported measures. This mini review synthesizes the post Green Deal policy timeline, identifies regulatory factors that directly affect farmers' pest management choices, examines emerging quantitative trends, and discusses practical implications for industry, advisory systems, and growers. Particular attention is given to the opportunities and limitations of Harmonized Risk Indicators (HRIs) - notably their sales-based nature and limited capacity to reflect actual ecological exposure, alongside uneven IPM implementation among Member States and emerging climate-driven pest pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":517424,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in insect science","volume":"6 ","pages":"1901258"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13439864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in insect science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2026.1901258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Green Deal, the main aim of which is to substantially change the agricultural production systems through the Farm to Fork (F2F) Strategy, has caused the most significant reconsideration of pest management in the European Union (EU) in a generation. Since 2020, several regulatory and policy measures have affected pest management decisions, including revised risk assessment procedures for plant protection products, restrictions on certain emergency derogations, updated rules facilitating microbial biological control agents, and the integration of IPM (Integrated Pest Management)-related measures into the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) eco-schemes. At the same time, implementation has been challenging. The proposed Sustainable Use Regulation (SUR), which aimed to introduce binding pesticide reduction targets and additional restrictions in sensitive areas, was withdrawn in 2024 following political disagreement within the EU Commission and concerns regarding implementation feasibility. As a result, pesticide governance remains primarily based on the Sustainable Use Directive (SUD), national action plans, and CAP-supported measures. This mini review synthesizes the post Green Deal policy timeline, identifies regulatory factors that directly affect farmers' pest management choices, examines emerging quantitative trends, and discusses practical implications for industry, advisory systems, and growers. Particular attention is given to the opportunities and limitations of Harmonized Risk Indicators (HRIs) - notably their sales-based nature and limited capacity to reflect actual ecological exposure, alongside uneven IPM implementation among Member States and emerging climate-driven pest pressures.

绿色协议后的欧洲农业有害生物管理实践——差距和挑战。
《欧洲绿色协议》的主要目标是通过“从农场到餐桌”(F2F)战略大幅改变农业生产体系,该协议在一代人的时间里引起了欧盟(EU)对有害生物管理的最重大反思。自2020年以来,若干监管和政策措施影响了有害生物管理决策,包括修订植物保护产品风险评估程序、限制某些紧急减损、更新促进微生物生物防治剂的规则,以及将有害生物综合治理相关措施纳入共同农业政策生态计划。与此同时,实施起来也很有挑战性。拟议的可持续使用法规(SUR)旨在引入具有约束力的农药减少目标和敏感地区的额外限制,由于欧盟委员会内部的政治分歧和对实施可行性的担忧,该法规于2024年被撤回。因此,农药治理仍然主要基于可持续使用指令(SUD)、国家行动计划和cap支持的措施。这篇小型综述综合了绿色新政后的政策时间表,确定了直接影响农民病虫害管理选择的监管因素,研究了新兴的量化趋势,并讨论了对行业、咨询系统和种植者的实际影响。特别注意统一风险指标的机会和局限性-特别是其基于销售的性质和反映实际生态暴露的有限能力,以及成员国间IPM实施的不平衡和新出现的气候驱动的有害生物压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书