Melek Ince, Fatma Sibel Durak, Bugra Ince, Alan Steinberg
{"title":"Turkish UCLA PTSD-RI-5: Validation and the Role of Symptom Severity in Functional Impairment","authors":"Melek Ince, Fatma Sibel Durak, Bugra Ince, Alan Steinberg","doi":"10.1002/mpr.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study translated the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 into Turkish (PTSD-RI-5-TR), evaluated its psychometric properties, and examined whether PTSD symptom severity predicts functional impairment in Turkish adolescents aged 11–17.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 157 trauma-exposed adolescents from a tertiary Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic participated. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated. Construct validity was examined via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of a five-factor model. Convergent, divergent, criterion, and known-groups validity were tested. ROC analysis assessed diagnostic accuracy. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of scores on four functional domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>PTSD-RI-5-TR showed good internal consistency and test–retest reliability (acceptable for Category C). CFA indicated excellent fit (CMIN/DF, CFI, TLI, RMSEA) and good fit (GFI, NFI). Scores correlated strongly with NSESSS-PTSD and moderately with DES-B. PTSD diagnoses were associated with significantly higher scores. ROC analysis yielded an AUC = 0.909, sensitivity = 86.4%, specificity = 84.1% with an optimal cutoff score of 49.5. In total score models, each one-point increase predicted impairment in developmental progression (OR = 1.097), home (OR = 1.084), peer (OR = 1.071), and school functioning (OR = 1.063). In symptom cluster models, negative mood/cognition (D) most strongly predicted peer (OR = 1.205) and developmental impairment (OR = 1.155); avoidance (C) predicted home impairment (OR = 1.250); arousal/reactivity (E) predicted home (OR = 1.144) and school impairment (OR = 1.131); intrusion (B) showed no independent effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>PTSD-RI-5-TR is a reliable, valid tool for assessing PTSD in Turkish adolescents. Higher total PTSD scores and higher scores in the C, D, and E symptom clusters may indicate a greater likelihood of functional impairment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06077474 {2023-10-05})</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.70101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study translated the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 into Turkish (PTSD-RI-5-TR), evaluated its psychometric properties, and examined whether PTSD symptom severity predicts functional impairment in Turkish adolescents aged 11–17.
Methods
A total of 157 trauma-exposed adolescents from a tertiary Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic participated. Internal consistency and test–retest reliability were evaluated. Construct validity was examined via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of a five-factor model. Convergent, divergent, criterion, and known-groups validity were tested. ROC analysis assessed diagnostic accuracy. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of scores on four functional domains.
Results
PTSD-RI-5-TR showed good internal consistency and test–retest reliability (acceptable for Category C). CFA indicated excellent fit (CMIN/DF, CFI, TLI, RMSEA) and good fit (GFI, NFI). Scores correlated strongly with NSESSS-PTSD and moderately with DES-B. PTSD diagnoses were associated with significantly higher scores. ROC analysis yielded an AUC = 0.909, sensitivity = 86.4%, specificity = 84.1% with an optimal cutoff score of 49.5. In total score models, each one-point increase predicted impairment in developmental progression (OR = 1.097), home (OR = 1.084), peer (OR = 1.071), and school functioning (OR = 1.063). In symptom cluster models, negative mood/cognition (D) most strongly predicted peer (OR = 1.205) and developmental impairment (OR = 1.155); avoidance (C) predicted home impairment (OR = 1.250); arousal/reactivity (E) predicted home (OR = 1.144) and school impairment (OR = 1.131); intrusion (B) showed no independent effect.
Conclusion
PTSD-RI-5-TR is a reliable, valid tool for assessing PTSD in Turkish adolescents. Higher total PTSD scores and higher scores in the C, D, and E symptom clusters may indicate a greater likelihood of functional impairment.
Trial Registration
This study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT06077474 {2023-10-05})
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations.
MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted.
MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.