[Neuromodulation as the fourth pillar in the treatment of depression : A position paper of the German Center for Mental Health].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sarah Kayser, Beatrix Barth, Malek Bajbouj, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Martin F Gerchen, Ahmed A Karim, Joan Koti, Nils B Kroemer, Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt, Thomas Nickl-Jockschat, Michael A Nitsche, Marie-Luise Otte, Christian Plewnia, Alexander Sartorius, Stefan R Schweinberger, Julia Siodmiak, Surjo R Soekadar, Giovanni Vardiero, Ulrike Vogelmann, Tino Zaehle, Ulf Ziemann, David Zilles-Wegner, Alireza Gharabaghi, Andreas Fallgatter
{"title":"[Neuromodulation as the fourth pillar in the treatment of depression : A position paper of the German Center for Mental Health].","authors":"Sarah Kayser, Beatrix Barth, Malek Bajbouj, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Martin F Gerchen, Ahmed A Karim, Joan Koti, Nils B Kroemer, Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt, Thomas Nickl-Jockschat, Michael A Nitsche, Marie-Luise Otte, Christian Plewnia, Alexander Sartorius, Stefan R Schweinberger, Julia Siodmiak, Surjo R Soekadar, Giovanni Vardiero, Ulrike Vogelmann, Tino Zaehle, Ulf Ziemann, David Zilles-Wegner, Alireza Gharabaghi, Andreas Fallgatter","doi":"10.1007/s00115-026-01999-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive disorders are associated with a high burden of disease; a substantial proportion of patients show insufficient response despite guideline-based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, particularly in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Neuromodulation has become established as a fourth pillar in the treatment of depression and includes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), magnetic seizure therapy (MST), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and neurofeedback (NF). Despite partly well-established efficacy, these interventions remain insufficiently integrated into routine clinical care. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence and to analyze key barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Narrative review of clinical studies, meta-analyses, and care data on efficacy, safety and cognitive tolerability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest evidence for both acute and maintenance treatment of severe depressive disorders is for ECT; rTMS is effective and cognitively well tolerated and VNS can represent an additive long-term option in TRD. For tES, small and heterogeneous effects have been reported, MST and DBS remain experimental and for NF consistent evidence of efficacy is lacking. Key barriers include partly heterogeneous protocols, insufficient funding structures, particularly in the outpatient setting and the absence of standardized qualification requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neuromodulation should be systematically integrated into staged-care models. Standardized protocols and registry-based research are needed to enable the structured and sustainable implementation of neuromodulatory interventions in clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-01999-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depressive disorders are associated with a high burden of disease; a substantial proportion of patients show insufficient response despite guideline-based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, particularly in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Neuromodulation has become established as a fourth pillar in the treatment of depression and includes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), magnetic seizure therapy (MST), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and neurofeedback (NF). Despite partly well-established efficacy, these interventions remain insufficiently integrated into routine clinical care. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence and to analyze key barriers to implementation.

Material and methods: Narrative review of clinical studies, meta-analyses, and care data on efficacy, safety and cognitive tolerability.

Results: The strongest evidence for both acute and maintenance treatment of severe depressive disorders is for ECT; rTMS is effective and cognitively well tolerated and VNS can represent an additive long-term option in TRD. For tES, small and heterogeneous effects have been reported, MST and DBS remain experimental and for NF consistent evidence of efficacy is lacking. Key barriers include partly heterogeneous protocols, insufficient funding structures, particularly in the outpatient setting and the absence of standardized qualification requirements.

Conclusion: Neuromodulation should be systematically integrated into staged-care models. Standardized protocols and registry-based research are needed to enable the structured and sustainable implementation of neuromodulatory interventions in clinical care.

[神经调节作为抑郁症治疗的第四大支柱:德国心理健康中心的立场文件]。
背景:抑郁症与高疾病负担相关;尽管采用了基于指南的药物治疗和心理治疗,但仍有相当比例的患者反应不足,特别是在难治性抑郁症(TRD)中。神经调节已成为抑郁症治疗的第四大支柱,包括电痉挛治疗(ECT)、重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、迷走神经刺激(VNS)、经颅电刺激(tES)、磁癫痫治疗(MST)、深部脑刺激(DBS)和神经反馈(NF)。尽管这些干预措施在一定程度上得到了证实,但仍未充分纳入常规临床护理。本文的目的是总结目前的证据,并分析实施的主要障碍。材料和方法:对临床研究、荟萃分析和疗效、安全性和认知耐受性的护理数据进行叙述性回顾。结果:急性和维持治疗重度抑郁症最有力的证据是ECT;rTMS是有效的,认知耐受良好,而VNS可以作为TRD的长期选择。对于tES,已经报道了小而异质性的效果,MST和DBS仍处于实验阶段,对于NF缺乏一致的疗效证据。主要障碍包括部分不同的方案,资金结构不足,特别是在门诊环境中,以及缺乏标准化的资格要求。结论:应将神经调节系统地纳入分期护理模式。标准化的协议和基于登记的研究是必要的,以便在临床护理中结构化和可持续地实施神经调节干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书