Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) use in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD): results of the European Society for Organ Transplantation Bucharest consensus conference.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2026-07-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2026.16391
Eduardo Miñambres, Marius Berman, Marta Velia Antonini, Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral De La Cruz, Kristopher Croome, Giuseppe Feltrin, Amelia Hessheimer, Carl Jorns, Simon Messer, Anji Wall, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil, Dominique Martin, Gabriel Oniscu, Umberto Cillo
{"title":"Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) use in controlled donation after circulatory determination of death (cDCDD): results of the European Society for Organ Transplantation Bucharest consensus conference.","authors":"Eduardo Miñambres, Marius Berman, Marta Velia Antonini, Jose Luis Campo-Cañaveral De La Cruz, Kristopher Croome, Giuseppe Feltrin, Amelia Hessheimer, Carl Jorns, Simon Messer, Anji Wall, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil, Dominique Martin, Gabriel Oniscu, Umberto Cillo","doi":"10.3389/ti.2026.16391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) is emerging as a game-changer in enhancing outcomes for Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death (DCDD). NRP maintains physiological conditions through perfusion with oxygenated blood, outperforming conventional super-rapid recovery techniques significantly improving outcomes and organ utilization. Despite its clinical benefits, widespread adoption of NRP is impeded by heterogeneous organizational, legal, and ethical frameworks. At the ESOT Bucharest Consensus Conference, leading experts in transplantation achieved consensus on 130 relevant NRP-related open issues to facilitate its implementation and guide global practice. Key recommendations include criteria for adoption of NRP, minimal requirements, procedures to be adopted before and during NRP, donor organ evaluation criteria and sequence of organ harvesting. Consensus extends to procedural components (including the configuration of perfusion parameters and strategic team coordination), ethical integrity of NRP in the context of the dead donor rule and key unmet needs for future developments. While significant strides were made in unifying practice, unresolved issues regarding maximum warm ischemic time and variability in legal standards indicate avenues for future research. This consensus underscores the imperative for global standardization in NRP application, promising to elevate the success rates of organ transplants and establish NRP as a foundational element in the evolution of DCDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"39 ","pages":"16391"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13437514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2026.16391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Normothermic Regional Perfusion (NRP) is emerging as a game-changer in enhancing outcomes for Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death (DCDD). NRP maintains physiological conditions through perfusion with oxygenated blood, outperforming conventional super-rapid recovery techniques significantly improving outcomes and organ utilization. Despite its clinical benefits, widespread adoption of NRP is impeded by heterogeneous organizational, legal, and ethical frameworks. At the ESOT Bucharest Consensus Conference, leading experts in transplantation achieved consensus on 130 relevant NRP-related open issues to facilitate its implementation and guide global practice. Key recommendations include criteria for adoption of NRP, minimal requirements, procedures to be adopted before and during NRP, donor organ evaluation criteria and sequence of organ harvesting. Consensus extends to procedural components (including the configuration of perfusion parameters and strategic team coordination), ethical integrity of NRP in the context of the dead donor rule and key unmet needs for future developments. While significant strides were made in unifying practice, unresolved issues regarding maximum warm ischemic time and variability in legal standards indicate avenues for future research. This consensus underscores the imperative for global standardization in NRP application, promising to elevate the success rates of organ transplants and establish NRP as a foundational element in the evolution of DCDD.

常温区域灌注(NRP)用于循环测定死亡(cDCDD)后的受控捐献:欧洲器官移植学会布加勒斯特共识会议的结果。
常温区域灌注(NRP)正在成为一种改变游戏规则的方法,可以提高循环死亡测定(DCDD)后捐献的结果。NRP通过充氧血液灌注维持生理状态,优于传统的超快速恢复技术,显著提高了预后和器官利用率。尽管它的临床效益,广泛采用NRP阻碍了异质的组织,法律和伦理框架。在ESOT布加勒斯特共识会议上,移植领域的主要专家就130个与nrp相关的开放性问题达成了共识,以促进其实施并指导全球实践。主要建议包括采用非再生计划的标准、最低要求、在非再生计划之前和期间采用的程序、供体器官评价标准和摘取器官的顺序。共识扩展到程序组成部分(包括灌注参数的配置和战略团队协调),NRP在死亡供体规则背景下的道德完整性以及未来发展的关键未满足需求。虽然在统一实践方面取得了重大进展,但关于最大热缺血时间和法律标准可变性的未解决问题表明了未来研究的途径。这一共识强调了NRP应用的全球标准化的必要性,有望提高器官移植的成功率,并使NRP成为DCDD发展的基础要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书