Economic impact of potassium citrate in urolithiasis: A narrative review and economic evidence synthesis.

IF 0.9 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-13 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_37_26
Arianna Pischetola, Ali Talyshinskii, Wissam Kamal, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Economic impact of potassium citrate in urolithiasis: A narrative review and economic evidence synthesis.","authors":"Arianna Pischetola, Ali Talyshinskii, Wissam Kamal, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_37_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recurrent urolithiasis causes substantial healthcare and economic burden due to high recurrence rates and need for repeated interventions. Potassium citrate effectively prevents stone recurrence, yet its cost-effectiveness compared with nontreatment remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the economic impact of potassium citrate therapy in the prevention and management of urolithiasis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A structured narrative review was conducted to evaluate the economic impact of potassium citrate therapy in urolithiasis. Databases were searched for studies assessing costs, cost-effectiveness, or healthcare resource utilization related to potassium citrate. Due to substantial heterogeneity in analytic perspective, outcomes, time horizons, and healthcare system context, findings were synthesized narratively rather than quantitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The economic evidence base was limited but consistent in demonstrating a meaningful reduction in stone recurrence with potassium citrate therapy. Two decision-analytic economic evaluations showed that potassium citrate substantially lowers recurrence rates compared with conservative management, translating into reduced downstream healthcare utilization. Economic outcomes were most favorable in patients with high baseline recurrence risk and in healthcare systems with lower medication acquisition costs. Across models, recurrence risk, drug pricing, and treatment adherence emerged as clear and reproducible drivers of economic value. No studies incorporated quality-adjusted life years or health utility outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Potassium citrate is a clinically effective and economically reasonable preventive therapy for recurrent urolithiasis, particularly in high-risk and hypocitraturic patients. When targeted to appropriate populations, it reduces recurrence and can offset downstream treatment costs. The current evidence supports potassium citrate as a key component of preventive stone management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"18 3","pages":"199-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13441031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_37_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Recurrent urolithiasis causes substantial healthcare and economic burden due to high recurrence rates and need for repeated interventions. Potassium citrate effectively prevents stone recurrence, yet its cost-effectiveness compared with nontreatment remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the economic impact of potassium citrate therapy in the prevention and management of urolithiasis.

Materials and methods: A structured narrative review was conducted to evaluate the economic impact of potassium citrate therapy in urolithiasis. Databases were searched for studies assessing costs, cost-effectiveness, or healthcare resource utilization related to potassium citrate. Due to substantial heterogeneity in analytic perspective, outcomes, time horizons, and healthcare system context, findings were synthesized narratively rather than quantitatively.

Results: The economic evidence base was limited but consistent in demonstrating a meaningful reduction in stone recurrence with potassium citrate therapy. Two decision-analytic economic evaluations showed that potassium citrate substantially lowers recurrence rates compared with conservative management, translating into reduced downstream healthcare utilization. Economic outcomes were most favorable in patients with high baseline recurrence risk and in healthcare systems with lower medication acquisition costs. Across models, recurrence risk, drug pricing, and treatment adherence emerged as clear and reproducible drivers of economic value. No studies incorporated quality-adjusted life years or health utility outcomes.

Conclusion: Potassium citrate is a clinically effective and economically reasonable preventive therapy for recurrent urolithiasis, particularly in high-risk and hypocitraturic patients. When targeted to appropriate populations, it reduces recurrence and can offset downstream treatment costs. The current evidence supports potassium citrate as a key component of preventive stone management.

柠檬酸钾对尿石症的经济影响:综述和经济证据综合。
目的:复发性尿石症由于高复发率和需要反复干预而造成巨大的医疗和经济负担。柠檬酸钾可有效预防结石复发,但与不治疗相比,其成本效益尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估柠檬酸钾治疗在预防和治疗尿石症中的经济影响。材料和方法:对枸橼酸钾治疗尿石症的经济影响进行了结构化的回顾性研究。检索数据库以评估与柠檬酸钾相关的成本、成本效益或医疗保健资源利用的研究。由于分析角度、结果、时间范围和医疗保健系统背景的实质性异质性,研究结果是叙述性的而不是定量的。结果:经济证据基础有限,但一致表明柠檬酸钾治疗可显著减少结石复发。两项决策分析经济评估显示,与保守治疗相比,柠檬酸钾显著降低了复发率,转化为降低了下游医疗保健利用率。经济结果在基线复发风险高和医疗保健系统药物获取成本较低的患者中最为有利。在各个模型中,复发风险、药物定价和治疗依从性成为经济价值的明确且可重复的驱动因素。没有研究纳入质量调整寿命年或健康效用结果。结论:枸橼酸钾是一种临床有效、经济合理的预防复发性尿石症的药物,尤其适用于高危和低血压患者。当针对适当人群时,它可以减少复发率,并可以抵消下游治疗费用。目前的证据支持柠檬酸钾作为预防结石管理的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书