Miguel López-Moreno, Gonzalo Quesada, José Francisco López-Gil
{"title":"Starting Point Matters: Baseline Protein Intake as a Moderator of the Protein-Fat-Free Mass Relationship in Energy-Restricted Athletes.","authors":"Miguel López-Moreno, Gonzalo Quesada, José Francisco López-Gil","doi":"10.1007/s40279-026-02494-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research has attempted to quantify the dose-response relationship between dietary protein intake and fat-free mass preservation during energy restriction in resistance-trained individuals. While meta-regression analyses have helped identify intake ranges associated with fat-free mass retention, these models typically consider only the prescribed intervention dose. However, individuals enter dietary interventions with different baseline protein intakes, which may influence their physiological response to additional protein. We also highlight the importance of obtaining baseline dietary assessments after an appropriate dietary adaptation period, so that baseline protein intake is accurately characterized before the intervention begins. Ignoring this starting point may therefore obscure important heterogeneity in responsiveness across studies. In this Current Opinion, we discuss the potential role of baseline protein intake as a moderator of the protein-fat-free mass relationship and explore how accounting for baseline intake may alter the interpretation of protein dose-response models. We also present exploratory evidence suggesting that higher baseline protein intakes may be associated with diminishing returns in fat-free mass preservation. Considering baseline protein intake may help refine future research designs and support more individualized protein intake recommendations during energy restriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-026-02494-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent research has attempted to quantify the dose-response relationship between dietary protein intake and fat-free mass preservation during energy restriction in resistance-trained individuals. While meta-regression analyses have helped identify intake ranges associated with fat-free mass retention, these models typically consider only the prescribed intervention dose. However, individuals enter dietary interventions with different baseline protein intakes, which may influence their physiological response to additional protein. We also highlight the importance of obtaining baseline dietary assessments after an appropriate dietary adaptation period, so that baseline protein intake is accurately characterized before the intervention begins. Ignoring this starting point may therefore obscure important heterogeneity in responsiveness across studies. In this Current Opinion, we discuss the potential role of baseline protein intake as a moderator of the protein-fat-free mass relationship and explore how accounting for baseline intake may alter the interpretation of protein dose-response models. We also present exploratory evidence suggesting that higher baseline protein intakes may be associated with diminishing returns in fat-free mass preservation. Considering baseline protein intake may help refine future research designs and support more individualized protein intake recommendations during energy restriction.
期刊介绍:
Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports.
Types of Articles:
Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings.
Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field.
Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles.
Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content.
Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances.
Peer Review Process:
All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.