Validation and prognostic utility of SLERPI in a single-centre retrospective Central European cohort.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lupus Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-05 DOI:10.1177/09612033261474985
Andrea Zoli, Seda Nur Aydogdu, Danae-Mona Nöthling, Paraskevi Chasani, Maria Antonietta D' Agostino, Silvia Laura Bosello, Andreas Ramming, Christina Bergmann, Georg Schett, Chiu Wai Shirley Chan, Panagiotis Garantziotis
{"title":"Validation and prognostic utility of SLERPI in a single-centre retrospective Central European cohort.","authors":"Andrea Zoli, Seda Nur Aydogdu, Danae-Mona Nöthling, Paraskevi Chasani, Maria Antonietta D' Agostino, Silvia Laura Bosello, Andreas Ramming, Christina Bergmann, Georg Schett, Chiu Wai Shirley Chan, Panagiotis Garantziotis","doi":"10.1177/09612033261474985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SLE Risk Probability Index (SLERPI) in a European cohort and explore its potential prognostic utility for early flare risk stratification.MethodsThis retrospective study included 280 patients with physician-diagnosed SLE and 156 non-SLE controls from a tertiary centre. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve [AUC]) of the SLERPI and the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria were assessed against physician diagnosis as the reference standard. Severe flares within 3 years of diagnosis were defined using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of severe flare.ResultsSLERPI demonstrated a higher AUC than the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria (0.967, 95% CI 0.950-0.984 vs 0.932, 95% CI 0.908-0.957; DeLong p = 0.0004) and greater specificity (97.4% vs 94.9%), whereas sensitivity (85.7% vs 87.1%) and negative predictive value (79.2% vs 80.4%) were slightly lower. Analysis of discordant classifications revealed that the SLERPI captured cutaneous-predominant presentations more effectively, while the EULAR/ACR criteria showed greater sensitivity for serositis-driven disease. Patients who developed a severe flare within 3 years had significantly higher baseline SLERPI scores (<i>p</i> = 0.047). Youden's J statistic identified a threshold of ≥10.2 points as potentially informative for severe flare risk stratification. In multivariable analysis, a model incorporating SLERPI constituent items identified proteinuria and serositis at diagnosis as independent predictors of severe flare (AUC 0.708, 95% CI 0.641-0.775); bootstrap internal validation yielded a lower, optimism-corrected AUC of 0.635 (95% CI 0.574-0.695).ConclusionSLERPI demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in a single-centre retrospective Central European cohort. Exploratory analyses suggest that higher baseline SLERPI scores may be associated with an increased risk of early severe flares; however, these findings require external validation before prognostic use can be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"1292-1300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13569890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033261474985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the SLE Risk Probability Index (SLERPI) in a European cohort and explore its potential prognostic utility for early flare risk stratification.MethodsThis retrospective study included 280 patients with physician-diagnosed SLE and 156 non-SLE controls from a tertiary centre. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve [AUC]) of the SLERPI and the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria were assessed against physician diagnosis as the reference standard. Severe flares within 3 years of diagnosis were defined using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of severe flare.ResultsSLERPI demonstrated a higher AUC than the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria (0.967, 95% CI 0.950-0.984 vs 0.932, 95% CI 0.908-0.957; DeLong p = 0.0004) and greater specificity (97.4% vs 94.9%), whereas sensitivity (85.7% vs 87.1%) and negative predictive value (79.2% vs 80.4%) were slightly lower. Analysis of discordant classifications revealed that the SLERPI captured cutaneous-predominant presentations more effectively, while the EULAR/ACR criteria showed greater sensitivity for serositis-driven disease. Patients who developed a severe flare within 3 years had significantly higher baseline SLERPI scores (p = 0.047). Youden's J statistic identified a threshold of ≥10.2 points as potentially informative for severe flare risk stratification. In multivariable analysis, a model incorporating SLERPI constituent items identified proteinuria and serositis at diagnosis as independent predictors of severe flare (AUC 0.708, 95% CI 0.641-0.775); bootstrap internal validation yielded a lower, optimism-corrected AUC of 0.635 (95% CI 0.574-0.695).ConclusionSLERPI demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy in a single-centre retrospective Central European cohort. Exploratory analyses suggest that higher baseline SLERPI scores may be associated with an increased risk of early severe flares; however, these findings require external validation before prognostic use can be recommended.

SLERPI在中欧单中心回顾性队列中的验证和预后效用。
目的评估SLE风险概率指数(SLERPI)在欧洲队列中的诊断性能,并探讨其在早期耀斑风险分层中的潜在预后效用。方法本回顾性研究包括280例内科诊断SLE患者和156例非SLE对照。将SLERPI和2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/美国风湿病学会(ACR)分类标准的诊断性能(敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积[AUC])与医生诊断作为参考标准进行评估。使用SELENA-SLEDAI耀斑指数定义诊断3年内的严重耀斑。使用多变量逻辑回归来确定严重耀斑的预测因子。结果slerpi的AUC高于2019年EULAR/ACR标准(0.967,95% CI 0.950-0.984 vs 0.932, 95% CI 0.908-0.957; DeLong p = 0.0004),特异性更高(97.4% vs 94.9%),而敏感性(85.7% vs 87.1%)和阴性预测值(79.2% vs 80.4%)略低。对不一致分类的分析显示,SLERPI更有效地反映了以皮肤为主的表现,而EULAR/ACR标准对血清炎症驱动的疾病更敏感。3年内发生严重耀斑的患者的基线SLERPI评分明显较高(p = 0.047)。Youden's J统计值确定≥10.2分的阈值为严重耀斑风险分层的潜在信息。在多变量分析中,纳入SLERPI组成项的模型将诊断时的蛋白尿和浆膜炎确定为严重耀斑的独立预测因子(AUC 0.708, 95% CI 0.641-0.775);bootstrap内部验证产生了较低的、乐观修正的AUC为0.635 (95% CI 0.574-0.695)。结论slerpi在中欧单中心回顾性队列中具有较高的诊断准确性。探索性分析表明,较高的基线SLERPI评分可能与早期严重耀斑的风险增加有关;然而,这些发现需要外部验证才能推荐预后使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus
Lupus 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书