"A good bang for your buck": Practitioner perspectives of prescribing and monitoring High-Intensity Multimodal Training.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Tijana Sharp, Lee Wallace, Charlize D Marques, Samuel Higham, Aaron J Coutts, Katie Slattery
{"title":"\"A good bang for your buck\": Practitioner perspectives of prescribing and monitoring High-Intensity Multimodal Training.","authors":"Tijana Sharp, Lee Wallace, Charlize D Marques, Samuel Higham, Aaron J Coutts, Katie Slattery","doi":"10.1016/j.jsams.2026.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>High-Intensity Multimodal Training (HIMT) combines high-intensity aerobic, resistance and/or bodyweight training throughout a single session. It is widely used in community settings and may promote time-efficient participation in physical activity and exercise enjoyment. Despite this, there remains large heterogeneity in the literature, limiting the understanding of the best practice methods for practitioners to prescribe and monitor HIMT. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the professional experiences of HIMT practitioners to gain insight into current real-world practice.</p><p><strong>Design & methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 HIMT practitioners. Thematic analysis principles underpinned the application of both deductive and inductive codes to the data to generate key themes using a five-phase framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIMT practitioners described variety in prescription and monitoring practices. Practitioners also perceived challenges in maintaining client engagement whilst adhering to scientific principles, alongside managing logistical constraints inherent to group-based training environments. Subjective intensity monitoring tools (e.g., rating of perceived exertion) were favoured due to their feasibility and practicality. HIMT was perceived as a time-efficient, engaging training mode. However, concerns were raised that HIMT may limit the magnitude of specific physical adaptations (e.g., strength, skill development).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIMT practitioners adopt context-driven approaches to exercise prescription and monitoring that prioritise practicality, feasibility and client engagement. Perspectives suggest that clearer prescriptive recommendations are required to support practitioners in aligning HIMT session design with intended training outcomes. These findings highlight the need for ecologically valid research that reflects the realities of HIMT delivery and supports the translation of research to practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science and medicine in sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2026.07.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: High-Intensity Multimodal Training (HIMT) combines high-intensity aerobic, resistance and/or bodyweight training throughout a single session. It is widely used in community settings and may promote time-efficient participation in physical activity and exercise enjoyment. Despite this, there remains large heterogeneity in the literature, limiting the understanding of the best practice methods for practitioners to prescribe and monitor HIMT. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the professional experiences of HIMT practitioners to gain insight into current real-world practice.

Design & methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 HIMT practitioners. Thematic analysis principles underpinned the application of both deductive and inductive codes to the data to generate key themes using a five-phase framework.

Results: HIMT practitioners described variety in prescription and monitoring practices. Practitioners also perceived challenges in maintaining client engagement whilst adhering to scientific principles, alongside managing logistical constraints inherent to group-based training environments. Subjective intensity monitoring tools (e.g., rating of perceived exertion) were favoured due to their feasibility and practicality. HIMT was perceived as a time-efficient, engaging training mode. However, concerns were raised that HIMT may limit the magnitude of specific physical adaptations (e.g., strength, skill development).

Conclusions: HIMT practitioners adopt context-driven approaches to exercise prescription and monitoring that prioritise practicality, feasibility and client engagement. Perspectives suggest that clearer prescriptive recommendations are required to support practitioners in aligning HIMT session design with intended training outcomes. These findings highlight the need for ecologically valid research that reflects the realities of HIMT delivery and supports the translation of research to practice.

“物有所值”:开处方和监控高强度多模式训练的实践者视角。
目的:高强度多模式训练(HIMT)将高强度有氧、阻力和/或体重训练结合在一起。它被广泛应用于社区环境,并可能促进时间效率参与体育活动和运动的乐趣。尽管如此,文献中仍然存在很大的异质性,限制了从业者对处方和监测HIMT的最佳实践方法的理解。因此,本研究旨在探讨HIMT从业者的专业经验,以深入了解当前的现实实践。设计与方法:对32名HIMT从业人员进行半结构化访谈。主题分析原则支持对数据应用演绎和归纳代码,以使用五阶段框架生成关键主题。结果:HIMT从业者描述了处方和监测实践的多样性。从业人员还意识到在坚持科学原则的同时保持客户参与的挑战,以及管理基于小组的培训环境固有的后勤约束。主观强度监测工具(例如,感知运动强度评级)因其可行性和实用性而受到青睐。HIMT被认为是一种省时、有吸引力的培训模式。然而,有人担心,HIMT可能会限制特定身体适应的程度(例如,力量,技能发展)。结论:HIMT从业者采用情境驱动的方法进行运动处方和监测,优先考虑实用性、可行性和客户参与。观点表明,需要更清晰的规定性建议来支持从业者将HIMT课程设计与预期的培训结果相一致。这些发现强调了对生态有效的研究的需求,这些研究反映了HIMT交付的现实,并支持将研究转化为实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport is the official journal of Sports Medicine Australia (SMA) and is an an international refereed research publication covering all aspects of sport science and medicine. The Journal considers for publication Original research and Review papers in the sub-disciplines relating generally to the broad sports medicine and sports science fields: sports medicine, sports injury (including injury epidemiology and injury prevention), physiotherapy, podiatry, physical activity and health, sports science, biomechanics, exercise physiology, motor control and learning, sport and exercise psychology, sports nutrition, public health (as relevant to sport and exercise), and rehabilitation and injury management. Manuscripts with an interdisciplinary perspective with specific applications to sport and exercise and its interaction with health will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书