Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Combined with Subtalar Arthroereisis and Medial Column Stabilisation in the Treatment of PCFD: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-03-12 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-026-01756-8
Guanglong Zeng, Qingxiang Xie, Haiquan Mai, Liu Zhang, Boyuan Su
{"title":"Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Combined with Subtalar Arthroereisis and Medial Column Stabilisation in the Treatment of PCFD: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Guanglong Zeng, Qingxiang Xie, Haiquan Mai, Liu Zhang, Boyuan Su","doi":"10.1007/s43465-026-01756-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Both the stability of the subtalar joint and the support of the medial column serve as crucial stabilising structures in progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). Effective restoration of these stabilising components-often involving gastrocnemius or Achilles tendon recession-is essential for the treatment of PCFD. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) combined with subtalar arthroereisis and medial column stabilisation for PCFD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients (68 feet) with PCFD treated at our hospital between February 2023 and April 2024 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into two groups based on treatment regimen: the intervention group (IG, <i>n</i> = 36), which received ESWT combined with subtalar arthroereisis (HyProCure) and medial column stabilisation [hereinafter referred to as 'dual stabilisation procedures (DSP)'], and the control group (CG, <i>n</i> = 32), which underwent DSP alone. The groups underwent preoperative and postoperative assessments of clinical function and imaging parameters. Clinical function assessments included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and Tegner activity scale score. Conversely, imaging assessments encompassed weight-bearing anteroposterior talo-first metatarsal angle (T1-MT), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), lateral calcaneal pitch angle (pitch angle), lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (Meary's angle), calcaneal valgus angle (CVA), and elastic modulus of the Achilles tendon or gastrocnemius muscle. Complications, including flatfoot recurrence, internal fixation implant rejection, and wound infection, were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative follow-up lasted at least 12 months, with a mean duration of (13.66 ± 1.65) months. At the last follow-up, analyses revealed that both groups exhibited significant improvements in weight-bearing X-ray parameters (T1-MT, TNCA, pitch angle, Meary's angle and CVA) compared with their preoperative values (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The intervention group demonstrated superior outcomes for CVA and elastic modulus of the Achilles tendon and gastrocnemius muscle compared to the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperatively, in both groups, the AOFAS and Tegner activity scores were higher than the preoperative values within the same group, whereas the VAS scores were lower relative to the preoperative measurements. Notably, the intervention group showed higher AOFAS and Tegner activity scores than the control group at 2 and 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and a lower VAS score at 2 months postoperatively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). During follow-up, 59 patients (86.76%) from both groups met the criteria for returning to athletic activity. The intervention group achieved a shorter time to return to athletic activity [(6.26 ± 1.26) months; 33 cases, 91.67%] compared with the control group [(8.24 ± 2.06) months; 26 cases, 81.25%], with a significant difference (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Postoperatively, one patient in the intervention group developed recurrence of flatfoot deformity after removal of the subtalar joint stabiliser, and one patient in the control group had poor healing of an infected medial foot wound. No other severe adverse complications were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESWT combined with DSP effectively ameliorates PCFD, restores ankle-foot function and lower limb alignment and facilitates earlier return to athletic activity postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"60 8","pages":"2042-2053"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13438090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-026-01756-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Both the stability of the subtalar joint and the support of the medial column serve as crucial stabilising structures in progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD). Effective restoration of these stabilising components-often involving gastrocnemius or Achilles tendon recession-is essential for the treatment of PCFD. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) combined with subtalar arthroereisis and medial column stabilisation for PCFD.

Methods: Sixty-eight patients (68 feet) with PCFD treated at our hospital between February 2023 and April 2024 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into two groups based on treatment regimen: the intervention group (IG, n = 36), which received ESWT combined with subtalar arthroereisis (HyProCure) and medial column stabilisation [hereinafter referred to as 'dual stabilisation procedures (DSP)'], and the control group (CG, n = 32), which underwent DSP alone. The groups underwent preoperative and postoperative assessments of clinical function and imaging parameters. Clinical function assessments included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and Tegner activity scale score. Conversely, imaging assessments encompassed weight-bearing anteroposterior talo-first metatarsal angle (T1-MT), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCA), lateral calcaneal pitch angle (pitch angle), lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (Meary's angle), calcaneal valgus angle (CVA), and elastic modulus of the Achilles tendon or gastrocnemius muscle. Complications, including flatfoot recurrence, internal fixation implant rejection, and wound infection, were also documented.

Results: Postoperative follow-up lasted at least 12 months, with a mean duration of (13.66 ± 1.65) months. At the last follow-up, analyses revealed that both groups exhibited significant improvements in weight-bearing X-ray parameters (T1-MT, TNCA, pitch angle, Meary's angle and CVA) compared with their preoperative values (P < 0.05). The intervention group demonstrated superior outcomes for CVA and elastic modulus of the Achilles tendon and gastrocnemius muscle compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, in both groups, the AOFAS and Tegner activity scores were higher than the preoperative values within the same group, whereas the VAS scores were lower relative to the preoperative measurements. Notably, the intervention group showed higher AOFAS and Tegner activity scores than the control group at 2 and 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05) and a lower VAS score at 2 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). During follow-up, 59 patients (86.76%) from both groups met the criteria for returning to athletic activity. The intervention group achieved a shorter time to return to athletic activity [(6.26 ± 1.26) months; 33 cases, 91.67%] compared with the control group [(8.24 ± 2.06) months; 26 cases, 81.25%], with a significant difference (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, one patient in the intervention group developed recurrence of flatfoot deformity after removal of the subtalar joint stabiliser, and one patient in the control group had poor healing of an infected medial foot wound. No other severe adverse complications were observed in either group.

Conclusion: ESWT combined with DSP effectively ameliorates PCFD, restores ankle-foot function and lower limb alignment and facilitates earlier return to athletic activity postoperatively.

体外冲击波治疗联合距下关节挛缩和内侧柱稳定治疗PCFD的回顾性研究。
目的:距下关节的稳定性和内侧柱的支撑是进行性塌陷足畸形(PCFD)的关键稳定结构。有效地恢复这些稳定部件(通常涉及腓肠肌或跟腱衰退)对于治疗PCFD至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)联合距下关节挛缩和内侧柱稳定治疗PCFD的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析我院2023年2月至2024年4月收治的68例(68英尺)PCFD患者。根据治疗方案将患者分为干预组(IG, n = 36)和对照组(CG, n = 32)。干预组采用ESWT联合距下关节固定术(hysuccess)和内侧柱稳定术(以下简称“双重稳定术(DSP)”),对照组单独采用DSP。各组术前和术后均进行临床功能和影像学参数评估。临床功能评估包括疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、美国矫形足踝学会(AOFAS)踝关节-后足评分和Tegner活动量表评分。相反,影像学评估包括负重前后距第一跖骨角(T1-MT)、距舟骨覆盖角(TNCA)、外侧跟骨俯仰角(俯仰角)、外侧距第一跖骨角(Meary's角)、跟骨外翻角(CVA)和跟腱或腓骨肌弹性模量。并发症包括扁平足复发、内固定排斥反应和伤口感染也有记录。结果:术后随访至少12个月,平均(13.66±1.65)个月。在最后一次随访时,分析显示两组患者的负重x线参数(T1-MT、TNCA、俯仰角、Meary’s角和CVA)均较术前有显著改善(P P P P P P)。结论:ESWT联合DSP有效改善PCFD,恢复踝足功能和下肢直线,有助于术后早期恢复运动活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书