Clinical Study of Modified Tibial Transverse Transport Combined with the Masquelet Technique for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot with Ulcers.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-05-15 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-026-01806-1
Qing Ma, Bin Liu, Jianxue Zeng, Liang Lu
{"title":"Clinical Study of Modified Tibial Transverse Transport Combined with the Masquelet Technique for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot with Ulcers.","authors":"Qing Ma, Bin Liu, Jianxue Zeng, Liang Lu","doi":"10.1007/s43465-026-01806-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective and background: </strong>To analyze the clinical effect of modified tibial transverse transport combined with the Masquelet technique in treating diabetic foot with ulcers (Wagner stages 2-4). This study was conducted to explore a novel combined surgical strategy for Wagner 2-4 diabetic foot ulcers that respond poorly to conventional treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 46 patients with Wagner 2-4 diabetic foot ulcers were enrolled (23 per group). Both groups received standardized preoperative glycemic control and infection management. The intervention group underwent modified tibial transverse transport (10 × 1.8 cm bone window; distraction starting on day 7 at 1 mm/day for 3 weeks, followed by reverse transport) combined with the Masquelet technique (PMMA spacer implantation at stage I, followed by autologous bone grafting at 6-8 weeks). The control group received conventional treatment, including debridement, VSD, and systemic antibiotics, without bone transport or induced membrane procedures. The primary outcome was limb salvage rate at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included wound healing rate, time to wound healing, MRI-confirmed edema resolution, changes in inflammatory markers, and 6-month recurrence rate. The hierarchical testing procedure was applied with limb salvage as the first endpoint; only if significant would subsequent endpoints be formally tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range 3-12 months), the complete wound healing rate (defined as complete epithelialization without drainage sustained for ≥ 2 weeks, achieved without or after minor amputation) was 82.6% (19/23) versus 69.6% (16/23) (<i>P</i> = 0.289). The limb salvage rate (avoidance of major amputation above ankle) was 100% (23/23) in both groups (<i>P</i> = 1.000). Among the 19 healed patients in the intervention group, 15 achieved healing without amputation, and 4 achieved healing after minor amputation (toe/ray); among the 16 healed control patients, 9 achieved healing without amputation and 7 achieved healing after minor amputation. Four intervention patients and seven control patients did not achieve wound healing within the study period. Among healed patients with complete 6-month post-healing follow-up (<i>n</i> = 19 intervention, <i>n</i> = 16 control), recurrence rates were 15.8% (3/19) and 31.3% (5/16), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.113). Four intervention patients and seven control patients did not achieve wound healing or were lost to follow-up before 6 months and were excluded from recurrence analysis. Four patients in the intervention group and seven in the control group did not achieve wound healing within the study period and were excluded from recurrence analysis. Wound healing time showed a trend toward a shorter duration in the intervention group (4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 5.8 ± 2.4 months, <i>P</i> = 0.056). Postoperative inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP), affected foot skin temperature, toe oxygen saturation, and clinical scores (VAS) showed significantly greater improvement in the intervention group compared with control (<i>P</i> < 0.05), while WBC, HbA1c, and TCSS scores improved in both groups without a significant between-group difference. CTA-demonstrated dorsal foot artery recanalization was observed in 78% (18/23) of the intervention group versus 52% (12/23) of the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.068). Clinical dorsal foot artery palpability normalization was observed in 48% (11/23) versus 17% (4/23) (<i>P</i> = 0.068).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As an exploratory pilot study, modified tibial transverse transport combined with the Masquelet technique presents potential clinical benefits for the treatment of diabetic foot with ulcers, including tentative trends toward improved limb salvage and accelerated wound healing, without definitive causal associations established.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"60 8","pages":"2061-2074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13438089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-026-01806-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective and background: To analyze the clinical effect of modified tibial transverse transport combined with the Masquelet technique in treating diabetic foot with ulcers (Wagner stages 2-4). This study was conducted to explore a novel combined surgical strategy for Wagner 2-4 diabetic foot ulcers that respond poorly to conventional treatments.

Methods: A total of 46 patients with Wagner 2-4 diabetic foot ulcers were enrolled (23 per group). Both groups received standardized preoperative glycemic control and infection management. The intervention group underwent modified tibial transverse transport (10 × 1.8 cm bone window; distraction starting on day 7 at 1 mm/day for 3 weeks, followed by reverse transport) combined with the Masquelet technique (PMMA spacer implantation at stage I, followed by autologous bone grafting at 6-8 weeks). The control group received conventional treatment, including debridement, VSD, and systemic antibiotics, without bone transport or induced membrane procedures. The primary outcome was limb salvage rate at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included wound healing rate, time to wound healing, MRI-confirmed edema resolution, changes in inflammatory markers, and 6-month recurrence rate. The hierarchical testing procedure was applied with limb salvage as the first endpoint; only if significant would subsequent endpoints be formally tested.

Results: With a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range 3-12 months), the complete wound healing rate (defined as complete epithelialization without drainage sustained for ≥ 2 weeks, achieved without or after minor amputation) was 82.6% (19/23) versus 69.6% (16/23) (P = 0.289). The limb salvage rate (avoidance of major amputation above ankle) was 100% (23/23) in both groups (P = 1.000). Among the 19 healed patients in the intervention group, 15 achieved healing without amputation, and 4 achieved healing after minor amputation (toe/ray); among the 16 healed control patients, 9 achieved healing without amputation and 7 achieved healing after minor amputation. Four intervention patients and seven control patients did not achieve wound healing within the study period. Among healed patients with complete 6-month post-healing follow-up (n = 19 intervention, n = 16 control), recurrence rates were 15.8% (3/19) and 31.3% (5/16), respectively (P = 0.113). Four intervention patients and seven control patients did not achieve wound healing or were lost to follow-up before 6 months and were excluded from recurrence analysis. Four patients in the intervention group and seven in the control group did not achieve wound healing within the study period and were excluded from recurrence analysis. Wound healing time showed a trend toward a shorter duration in the intervention group (4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 5.8 ± 2.4 months, P = 0.056). Postoperative inflammatory markers (ESR, CRP), affected foot skin temperature, toe oxygen saturation, and clinical scores (VAS) showed significantly greater improvement in the intervention group compared with control (P < 0.05), while WBC, HbA1c, and TCSS scores improved in both groups without a significant between-group difference. CTA-demonstrated dorsal foot artery recanalization was observed in 78% (18/23) of the intervention group versus 52% (12/23) of the control group (P = 0.068). Clinical dorsal foot artery palpability normalization was observed in 48% (11/23) versus 17% (4/23) (P = 0.068).

Conclusion: As an exploratory pilot study, modified tibial transverse transport combined with the Masquelet technique presents potential clinical benefits for the treatment of diabetic foot with ulcers, including tentative trends toward improved limb salvage and accelerated wound healing, without definitive causal associations established.

改良胫骨横移联合Masquelet技术治疗糖尿病足溃疡的临床研究。
目的与背景:分析改良胫骨横移联合Masquelet技术治疗糖尿病足溃疡(Wagner分期2-4)的临床效果。本研究旨在探索一种新的联合手术策略,治疗Wagner 2-4糖尿病足溃疡,这些溃疡对常规治疗反应不佳。方法:共纳入46例Wagner - 2糖尿病足溃疡患者(每组23例)。两组患者均接受标准化的术前血糖控制和感染管理。干预组采用改良胫骨横向运输(10 × 1.8 cm骨窗;第7天开始以1 mm/天的速度牵引,持续3周,然后反向运输)结合Masquelet技术(第一阶段PMMA垫片植入,6-8周进行自体骨移植)。对照组接受常规治疗,包括清创、VSD和全身抗生素,不进行骨转运或诱导膜手术。主要观察指标为6个月时肢体恢复率。次要结局包括伤口愈合率、伤口愈合时间、mri证实的水肿消退、炎症标志物变化和6个月复发率。采用分层检验程序,以残肢保存为第一终点;只有在显著的情况下,后续的端点才会被正式测试。结果:中位随访6.5个月(范围3-12个月),伤口完全愈合率(定义为完全上皮化,无引流,持续≥2周,在没有或在轻微截肢后实现)为82.6%(19/23)对69.6% (16/23)(P = 0.289)。两组残肢保留率(避免踝关节以上大面积截肢)均为100%(23/23),差异有统计学意义(P = 1.000)。干预组19例愈合患者中,未截肢愈合15例,轻微截肢(趾/趾)后愈合4例;对照组痊愈16例,未截肢痊愈9例,小截肢痊愈7例。4例干预患者和7例对照患者在研究期间未实现伤口愈合。愈合后随访6个月的患者中(干预组19例,对照组16例),复发率分别为15.8%(3/19)和31.3%(5/16),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.113)。4例干预组患者和7例对照组患者在6个月前伤口未愈合或失访,排除复发分析。干预组4例,对照组7例,在研究期间伤口未愈合,排除复发分析。干预组创面愈合时间有缩短的趋势(4.2±2.1∶5.8±2.4个月,P = 0.056)。干预组术后炎症指标(ESR、CRP)、影响足部皮肤温度、足部血氧饱和度、临床评分(VAS)较对照组明显改善(P P = 0.068)。临床足背动脉可触性恢复正常的比例为48% (11/23)vs 17% (4/23) (P = 0.068)。结论:作为一项探索性的初步研究,改良胫骨横向转运联合Masquelet技术在治疗糖尿病足溃疡方面具有潜在的临床益处,包括改善肢体保留和加速伤口愈合的初步趋势,但尚未确定明确的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书