James Pham, Tara Sholji, Marra Aghajani, Cindy Kok, John W Frew
{"title":"Approved Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa.","authors":"James Pham, Tara Sholji, Marra Aghajani, Cindy Kok, John W Frew","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Biologic therapies are increasingly used for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), yet their high cost presents challenges for health systems and payers. Comparative economic evaluations of these therapies are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency frontier of approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS across multiple countries.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This economic evaluation used publicly available clinical trial data and drug pricing data. Phase 3 trial efficacy data for adalimumab, secukinumab, and bimekizumab from 6 trials were combined with drug price data from the US, Canada, France, Germany, and Australia as of January 31, 2026. Data analysis was conducted between March 15 and May 22, 2026.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Efficiency frontier analysis using Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) 50 (indicating 50% reduction from baseline) and HiSCR-75 (indicating 75% reduction from baseline) metrics. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated where multiple agents lay on the frontier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all examined countries, adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly, consistently was on the efficiency frontier for both HiSCR-50 and HiSCR-75 outcomes. Secukinumab, 300 mg, every 4 weeks, appeared on the frontier only when US wholesale acquisition costs were used. Annual therapy costs ranged from $11 345 for adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly in Australia to $411 990 for bimekizumab, 320 mg, every 2 weeks in the US. Analyses using cost-efficiency estimates adjusted for baseline disease severity showed an efficiency frontier composition similar to unadjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, among currently approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS, adalimumab showed dominant cost-efficiency performance across multiple health systems. These findings highlight substantial international variation in biologic drug pricing and provide a framework for value-based pricing in HS therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2633","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Biologic therapies are increasingly used for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), yet their high cost presents challenges for health systems and payers. Comparative economic evaluations of these therapies are limited.
Objective: To evaluate the efficiency frontier of approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS across multiple countries.
Design and setting: This economic evaluation used publicly available clinical trial data and drug pricing data. Phase 3 trial efficacy data for adalimumab, secukinumab, and bimekizumab from 6 trials were combined with drug price data from the US, Canada, France, Germany, and Australia as of January 31, 2026. Data analysis was conducted between March 15 and May 22, 2026.
Main outcomes and measures: Efficiency frontier analysis using Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) 50 (indicating 50% reduction from baseline) and HiSCR-75 (indicating 75% reduction from baseline) metrics. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated where multiple agents lay on the frontier.
Results: Across all examined countries, adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly, consistently was on the efficiency frontier for both HiSCR-50 and HiSCR-75 outcomes. Secukinumab, 300 mg, every 4 weeks, appeared on the frontier only when US wholesale acquisition costs were used. Annual therapy costs ranged from $11 345 for adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly in Australia to $411 990 for bimekizumab, 320 mg, every 2 weeks in the US. Analyses using cost-efficiency estimates adjusted for baseline disease severity showed an efficiency frontier composition similar to unadjusted analyses.
Conclusions and relevance: In this study, among currently approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS, adalimumab showed dominant cost-efficiency performance across multiple health systems. These findings highlight substantial international variation in biologic drug pricing and provide a framework for value-based pricing in HS therapeutics.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery.
JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care.
The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists.
JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.