Approved Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
James Pham, Tara Sholji, Marra Aghajani, Cindy Kok, John W Frew
{"title":"Approved Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Hidradenitis Suppurativa.","authors":"James Pham, Tara Sholji, Marra Aghajani, Cindy Kok, John W Frew","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Biologic therapies are increasingly used for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), yet their high cost presents challenges for health systems and payers. Comparative economic evaluations of these therapies are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency frontier of approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS across multiple countries.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This economic evaluation used publicly available clinical trial data and drug pricing data. Phase 3 trial efficacy data for adalimumab, secukinumab, and bimekizumab from 6 trials were combined with drug price data from the US, Canada, France, Germany, and Australia as of January 31, 2026. Data analysis was conducted between March 15 and May 22, 2026.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Efficiency frontier analysis using Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) 50 (indicating 50% reduction from baseline) and HiSCR-75 (indicating 75% reduction from baseline) metrics. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated where multiple agents lay on the frontier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all examined countries, adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly, consistently was on the efficiency frontier for both HiSCR-50 and HiSCR-75 outcomes. Secukinumab, 300 mg, every 4 weeks, appeared on the frontier only when US wholesale acquisition costs were used. Annual therapy costs ranged from $11 345 for adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly in Australia to $411 990 for bimekizumab, 320 mg, every 2 weeks in the US. Analyses using cost-efficiency estimates adjusted for baseline disease severity showed an efficiency frontier composition similar to unadjusted analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, among currently approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS, adalimumab showed dominant cost-efficiency performance across multiple health systems. These findings highlight substantial international variation in biologic drug pricing and provide a framework for value-based pricing in HS therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13445090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2633","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Biologic therapies are increasingly used for moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), yet their high cost presents challenges for health systems and payers. Comparative economic evaluations of these therapies are limited.

Objective: To evaluate the efficiency frontier of approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS across multiple countries.

Design and setting: This economic evaluation used publicly available clinical trial data and drug pricing data. Phase 3 trial efficacy data for adalimumab, secukinumab, and bimekizumab from 6 trials were combined with drug price data from the US, Canada, France, Germany, and Australia as of January 31, 2026. Data analysis was conducted between March 15 and May 22, 2026.

Main outcomes and measures: Efficiency frontier analysis using Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) 50 (indicating 50% reduction from baseline) and HiSCR-75 (indicating 75% reduction from baseline) metrics. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated where multiple agents lay on the frontier.

Results: Across all examined countries, adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly, consistently was on the efficiency frontier for both HiSCR-50 and HiSCR-75 outcomes. Secukinumab, 300 mg, every 4 weeks, appeared on the frontier only when US wholesale acquisition costs were used. Annual therapy costs ranged from $11 345 for adalimumab, 40 mg, weekly in Australia to $411 990 for bimekizumab, 320 mg, every 2 weeks in the US. Analyses using cost-efficiency estimates adjusted for baseline disease severity showed an efficiency frontier composition similar to unadjusted analyses.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, among currently approved monoclonal antibody therapies for HS, adalimumab showed dominant cost-efficiency performance across multiple health systems. These findings highlight substantial international variation in biologic drug pricing and provide a framework for value-based pricing in HS therapeutics.

批准单克隆抗体治疗化脓性汗腺炎。
重要性:生物疗法越来越多地用于中重度化脓性汗腺炎(HS),但其高昂的费用给卫生系统和付款人带来了挑战。这些疗法的比较经济评估是有限的。目的:评价各国已批准的单克隆抗体治疗HS的疗效前沿。设计和环境:这项经济评估使用了公开的临床试验数据和药物定价数据。来自6项试验的阿达木单抗、secukinumab和比美珠单抗的3期试验疗效数据与截至2026年1月31日美国、加拿大、法国、德国和澳大利亚的药物价格数据相结合。数据分析时间为2026年3月15日至5月22日。主要结局和指标:利用化脓性汗腺炎临床反应(HiSCR) 50(较基线降低50%)和HiSCR-75(较基线降低75%)指标进行效率前沿分析。增量成本-效果比是在多个药物处于前沿的情况下计算的。结果:在所有被检查的国家中,阿达木单抗40mg,每周,对于HiSCR-50和HiSCR-75的结果始终处于效率前沿。Secukinumab, 300mg,每4周,只有在使用美国批发采购成本时才出现在前沿。每年的治疗费用从澳大利亚的阿达木单抗(40毫克,每周)11 345美元到美国的比美珠单抗(320毫克,每2周)411 990美元不等。使用经基线疾病严重程度调整的成本效率估算进行的分析显示,效率前沿组成与未经调整的分析相似。结论和相关性:在本研究中,在目前批准的HS单克隆抗体治疗中,阿达木单抗在多个卫生系统中显示出优势的成本效益表现。这些发现突出了生物药物定价的巨大国际差异,并为HS疗法的基于价值的定价提供了框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书