Temporal sensitivity and perceived timing in unimodal and crossmodal isochronous sequences.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Min Susan Li, Massimiliano Di Luca
{"title":"Temporal sensitivity and perceived timing in unimodal and crossmodal isochronous sequences.","authors":"Min Susan Li, Massimiliano Di Luca","doi":"10.1007/s00221-026-07371-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Temporal judgments depend on sequence regularity and on the sensory modality in which events occur. We asked whether modality-specific sequence history and across-trial modality context make distinct contributions to temporal sensitivity and perceived timing in isochrony judgments. Participants judged whether the sixth event in a six-item sequence occurred earlier or later than expected. The first five events were auditory or visual; the final event either matched this modality or switched modality. The four sequence types were presented either in separate blocks or randomly interleaved across trials; this manipulation is referred to as presentation mode. Temporal sensitivity, indexed by the just noticeable difference (JND), was better for auditory than for visual sequences and better for modality-consistent than for modality-inconsistent sequences. Effects involving presentation mode were treated as descriptive because this factor was between participants and confounded with hardware settings. Perceived timing, indexed by the point of subjective equality (PSE), showed large shifts for modality-switch endings in the interleaved group. The results support a dissociation between sequence-related effects on temporal sensitivity and context-dependent biases in perceived timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"244 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13447548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07371-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Temporal judgments depend on sequence regularity and on the sensory modality in which events occur. We asked whether modality-specific sequence history and across-trial modality context make distinct contributions to temporal sensitivity and perceived timing in isochrony judgments. Participants judged whether the sixth event in a six-item sequence occurred earlier or later than expected. The first five events were auditory or visual; the final event either matched this modality or switched modality. The four sequence types were presented either in separate blocks or randomly interleaved across trials; this manipulation is referred to as presentation mode. Temporal sensitivity, indexed by the just noticeable difference (JND), was better for auditory than for visual sequences and better for modality-consistent than for modality-inconsistent sequences. Effects involving presentation mode were treated as descriptive because this factor was between participants and confounded with hardware settings. Perceived timing, indexed by the point of subjective equality (PSE), showed large shifts for modality-switch endings in the interleaved group. The results support a dissociation between sequence-related effects on temporal sensitivity and context-dependent biases in perceived timing.

单峰和跨峰等时序列的时间敏感性和感知时间。
时间判断依赖于事件发生的顺序规律和感觉方式。我们询问了模态特异性序列历史和跨试验模态背景是否对等时判断的时间敏感性和感知时间有明显的贡献。参与者判断六个项目序列中的第六个事件是比预期发生得早还是晚。前五个事件是听觉或视觉的;最终事件要么匹配此模式,要么切换模式。四种序列类型要么单独呈现,要么在试验中随机交错呈现;这种操作称为表示模式。以刚显着差异(JND)为指标的时间敏感性,听觉序列优于视觉序列,模态一致序列优于模态不一致序列。涉及演示模式的影响被视为描述性的,因为这个因素是参与者之间的,并且与硬件设置相混淆。以主观平等点(PSE)为索引的感知时间显示,在交错组中,模态切换结束的变化很大。结果支持序列相关的时间敏感性效应和感知时间的语境依赖偏差之间的分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书