Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in high bleeding-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome: the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized trial.

IF 7.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nader Mankerious, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Adrian Wlodarczak, Béla Merkely, Henning Kelbæk, Guillaume Cayla, Jacek Legutko, Stefano Galli, Matthieu Godin, Gabor G Toth, Thibault Lhermusier, Mohammed Saad, Benjamin Honton, Francesca Sanguineti, Peter Laurenz Dietrich, Derk Frank, Francis Stammen, Bert Ferdinande, Johanne Silvain, Davide Capodanno, Holger Nef, Gert Richardt, Ralph Toelg, Marco Valgimigli
{"title":"Biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents in high bleeding-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome: the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized trial.","authors":"Nader Mankerious, Rayyan Hemetsberger, Adrian Wlodarczak, Béla Merkely, Henning Kelbæk, Guillaume Cayla, Jacek Legutko, Stefano Galli, Matthieu Godin, Gabor G Toth, Thibault Lhermusier, Mohammed Saad, Benjamin Honton, Francesca Sanguineti, Peter Laurenz Dietrich, Derk Frank, Francis Stammen, Bert Ferdinande, Johanne Silvain, Davide Capodanno, Holger Nef, Gert Richardt, Ralph Toelg, Marco Valgimigli","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuag089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated the clinical outcomes and their consistency after biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting (BP-SES) or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES) implantation in HBR patients with or without ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The per-protocol population of the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized control trial (RCT) consisted of HBR patients with (n = 541) or without ACS (n = 1245) who were randomized to BP-SES or DP-ZES and underwent 1 month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cd-TLR) as well as major bleeding defined as BARC 3 or 5 (according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). At 1 year, patients with ACS suffered from higher cardiac death rates (3.4 vs. 1.3%, log-rank P = 0.004) but similar TLF (6.8 vs. 6.7%, P = 0.992), TV-MI (2.8 vs. 4.5%, P = 0.100), cd-TLR (1.4 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.300), major bleeding (4.2 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.266), and ST (0.2 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.098) compared with no ACS patients. The rate of TLF and of all secondary endpoints was consistent with BP-SES or DP-ZES across ACS strata.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HBR patients with ACS are at higher risk of cardiac death than those without ACS and experience a consistent outcome with BP-SES or DP-ZES followed by 1 month DAPT at 1 year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT04137510.</p>","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":"596-607"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuag089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated the clinical outcomes and their consistency after biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting (BP-SES) or durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent (DP-ZES) implantation in HBR patients with or without ACS.

Methods and results: The per-protocol population of the BIOFLOW-DAPT randomized control trial (RCT) consisted of HBR patients with (n = 541) or without ACS (n = 1245) who were randomized to BP-SES or DP-ZES and underwent 1 month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cd-TLR) as well as major bleeding defined as BARC 3 or 5 (according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST). At 1 year, patients with ACS suffered from higher cardiac death rates (3.4 vs. 1.3%, log-rank P = 0.004) but similar TLF (6.8 vs. 6.7%, P = 0.992), TV-MI (2.8 vs. 4.5%, P = 0.100), cd-TLR (1.4 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.300), major bleeding (4.2 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.266), and ST (0.2 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.098) compared with no ACS patients. The rate of TLF and of all secondary endpoints was consistent with BP-SES or DP-ZES across ACS strata.

Conclusion: HBR patients with ACS are at higher risk of cardiac death than those without ACS and experience a consistent outcome with BP-SES or DP-ZES followed by 1 month DAPT at 1 year follow-up.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04137510.

生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架或耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架用于高风险急性冠脉综合征患者:BIOFLOW-DAPT随机试验
目的:高出血风险(HBR)和急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的不良结局风险高。我们研究了生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(BP-SES)或耐用聚合物佐他莫司洗脱支架(DP-ZES)在伴有或不伴有ACS的HBR患者中的临床结果及其一致性。方法和结果:BIOFLOW-DAPT随机对照试验(RCT)的按方案人群由患有(n = 541)或未患有ACS (n = 1245)的HBR患者组成,他们被随机分为BP-SES或DP-ZES,并接受1个月的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)。主要的疗效和安全性终点是靶病变失败(TLF),定义为心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(TV-MI)或临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(cd-TLR)的复合终点,以及定义为BARC 3或5的大出血(根据出血学术研究联盟的分类)和明确/可能的支架血栓形成(ST)。1年时,ACS患者的心脏死亡率较高(3.4 vs 1.3%, log-rank P = 0.004),但与无ACS患者相比,TLF (6.8 vs. 6.7%, P = 0.992)、TV-MI (2.8 vs. 4.5%, P = 0.100)、cd-TLR (1.4 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.300)、大出血(4.2 vs. 3.1%, P = 0.266)和ST (0.2 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.098)相似。TLF和所有次要终点的比率与ACS地层的BP-SES或DP-ZES一致。结论:HBR合并ACS患者的心源性死亡风险高于非ACS患者,并且在1年随访中BP-SES或DP-ZES随访1个月DAPT的结果一致。临床试验注册:NCT04137510。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.90%
发文量
325
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Acute Cardiovascular Care (EHJ-ACVC) offers a unique integrative approach by combining the expertise of the different sub specialties of cardiology, emergency and intensive care medicine in the management of patients with acute cardiovascular syndromes. Reading through the journal, cardiologists and all other healthcare professionals can access continuous updates that may help them to improve the quality of care and the outcome for patients with acute cardiovascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书