{"title":"Targeted Temperature Management at 35°C vs. 37°C for Heatstroke in ICU: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yu-Cong Wang, Jian-Wen Wang, Xu Li, Jie Jiang, Ling Lin, Zhong-Lin Yu, Yu-Kun Mu, Chun-Miao Pan, Da-Hai Geng, Xiao-Jiao Liu, Xin Fu, Tong-Ling Li, Zhi-Wei Yao, Lu-Ping Wang, Ai-Jia Ma, Yi-Song Cheng, Min He, Jing Yang, Xiao-Dong Jin, Yan Kang, Bo Wang, Zhong-Wei Zhang, Qin Wu","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000007266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a trial comparing targeted temperature management (TTM) at 35°C-37°C in intubated heatstroke patients, while collecting preliminary data on safety and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pilot multicenter randomized clinical trial (June to December 2024).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten tertiary ICUs in China.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Thirty-five intubated adults (18 yr or older) with heatstroke meeting predefined diagnostic criteria. Key exclusions: nonenvironmental hyperthermia, expected death within 24 hours, or contraindications to temperature management.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to two TTM strategies. The therapeutic hypothermia group received protocolized rapid cooling using a combination of ice packs, precooled blankets, and ice-cold IV saline to achieve the target of 35.0°C within 2 hours, which was then maintained for 48 hours. The controlled normothermia group received conventional cooling measures (ice packs, 32°C blankets) only if body temperature exceeded 38.0°C, with the goal of maintaining core temperature between 36.5°C and 37.5°C. Shivering was managed according to a stepwise protocol, with a \"lytic cocktail\" (chlorpromazine, promethazine, and meperidine) available as rescue therapy for refractory shivering in both groups.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Recruitment rate was 83.7%, retention rate was 97.2%, and protocol adherence exceeded 88%. For clinical outcomes, no significant differences were observed in 28-day poor functional outcome (17.6% vs. 16.7%) or survival (82.4% vs. 83.3%). However, therapeutic hypothermia was associated with significantly higher rates of severe gastrointestinal injury (Acute Gastrointestinal Injury grade 3-4: 52.9% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) and arrhythmias (41.2% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.045). The lytic cocktail was required in 100% of hypothermia-group patients vs. 27.8% in the normothermia group ( p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study confirms the operational feasibility of a large-scale randomized clinical trial. However, therapeutic hypothermia was associated with significantly worse gastrointestinal injury and higher arrhythmia incidence, without evidence of neurologic or survival benefit. The universal requirement for pharmacological shivering control in the hypothermia group raises additional safety considerations. Based on current evidence, this strategy should not be routinely adopted in ICU heatstroke management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2741-2753"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000007266","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a trial comparing targeted temperature management (TTM) at 35°C-37°C in intubated heatstroke patients, while collecting preliminary data on safety and clinical outcomes.
Design: Pilot multicenter randomized clinical trial (June to December 2024).
Setting: Ten tertiary ICUs in China.
Patients: Thirty-five intubated adults (18 yr or older) with heatstroke meeting predefined diagnostic criteria. Key exclusions: nonenvironmental hyperthermia, expected death within 24 hours, or contraindications to temperature management.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to two TTM strategies. The therapeutic hypothermia group received protocolized rapid cooling using a combination of ice packs, precooled blankets, and ice-cold IV saline to achieve the target of 35.0°C within 2 hours, which was then maintained for 48 hours. The controlled normothermia group received conventional cooling measures (ice packs, 32°C blankets) only if body temperature exceeded 38.0°C, with the goal of maintaining core temperature between 36.5°C and 37.5°C. Shivering was managed according to a stepwise protocol, with a "lytic cocktail" (chlorpromazine, promethazine, and meperidine) available as rescue therapy for refractory shivering in both groups.
Measurements and main results: Recruitment rate was 83.7%, retention rate was 97.2%, and protocol adherence exceeded 88%. For clinical outcomes, no significant differences were observed in 28-day poor functional outcome (17.6% vs. 16.7%) or survival (82.4% vs. 83.3%). However, therapeutic hypothermia was associated with significantly higher rates of severe gastrointestinal injury (Acute Gastrointestinal Injury grade 3-4: 52.9% vs. 0%; p < 0.001) and arrhythmias (41.2% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.045). The lytic cocktail was required in 100% of hypothermia-group patients vs. 27.8% in the normothermia group ( p < 0.001).
Conclusions: This pilot study confirms the operational feasibility of a large-scale randomized clinical trial. However, therapeutic hypothermia was associated with significantly worse gastrointestinal injury and higher arrhythmia incidence, without evidence of neurologic or survival benefit. The universal requirement for pharmacological shivering control in the hypothermia group raises additional safety considerations. Based on current evidence, this strategy should not be routinely adopted in ICU heatstroke management.
目的:评估在35°C-37°C插管中暑患者中进行针对性温度管理(TTM)比较试验的可行性,同时收集安全性和临床结果的初步数据。设计:多中心随机临床试验(2024年6月- 12月)。背景:中国有10个三级icu。患者:35例插管成人(18岁或以上)中暑符合预先定义的诊断标准。主要排除:非环境性热疗、24小时内预期死亡或温度管理禁忌。干预措施:患者按1:1的比例随机分为两种TTM策略。治疗性低温组采用冰袋、预冷毯、冰冻静脉生理盐水联合快速降温,在2小时内达到35.0°C的目标,并维持48小时。常温对照组只有在体温超过38.0℃时才接受常规降温措施(冰袋、32℃毛毯),目标是将核心温度维持在36.5℃至37.5℃之间。根据分步治疗方案治疗寒战,两组患者均可使用“溶性鸡尾酒”(氯丙嗪、异丙嗪和哌嗪)作为难治性寒战的抢救治疗。测量结果及主要结果:招募率为83.7%,保留率为97.2%,方案依从性超过88%。临床结果方面,28天功能不良结局(17.6% vs. 16.7%)或生存率(82.4% vs. 83.3%)无显著差异。然而,治疗性低温与严重胃肠损伤(急性胃肠损伤3-4级:52.9% vs. 0%; p < 0.001)和心律失常(41.2% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.045)的发生率显著升高相关。100%的低温组患者需要溶解鸡尾酒,而常温组为27.8% (p < 0.001)。结论:本初步研究证实了大规模随机临床试验的操作可行性。然而,治疗性低温与更严重的胃肠道损伤和更高的心律失常发生率相关,没有证据表明对神经系统或生存有益。在低温组中对颤抖的药理学控制的普遍要求提出了额外的安全考虑。根据目前的证据,在ICU中暑管理中不应常规采用该策略。
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.