{"title":"Risk, management and future directions for refeeding syndrome and enteral nutrition, an adult and paediatric perspective.","authors":"Kylie Matthews-Rensch, Julie Leake","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this review was to summarise recent relevant studies examining refeeding syndrome risk and related outcomes in patients provided with enteral nutrition and discuss considerations for clinical practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies investigating enteral nutrition and refeeding syndrome were heterogeneous. With the exception of physical indicators of nutritional status, there was no agreement across studies regarding commonly agreed upon risk factors including periods of fasting, feeding rates, or specific medical conditions. Comparisons of three different recommended risk criteria had highly variable results in one study. Confounding factors were evident across studies. Management of refeeding syndrome risk is becoming increasingly debated. Recent research has questioned the need for prolonged high thiamin dosages in adult patients with eating disorders. Conservative feeding practices are also called into question when serum electrolyte levels can be monitored and replaced assertively.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Clinical practice and research in refeeding syndrome is slowly changing, with a focus on preventing unnecessary and prolonged underfeeding in malnourished patients and in children during critical stages of growth. Future research should ensure risk criteria is specific to the clinical conditions and/or age groups being investigated. Refeeding syndrome and its subsequent management should also be considered along a spectrum, rather than as an all or nothing event. By incorporating these recommendations, research in the field will evolve to advance knowledge and enhance clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":"29 5","pages":"469-474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: The purpose of this review was to summarise recent relevant studies examining refeeding syndrome risk and related outcomes in patients provided with enteral nutrition and discuss considerations for clinical practice and future research.
Recent findings: Recent studies investigating enteral nutrition and refeeding syndrome were heterogeneous. With the exception of physical indicators of nutritional status, there was no agreement across studies regarding commonly agreed upon risk factors including periods of fasting, feeding rates, or specific medical conditions. Comparisons of three different recommended risk criteria had highly variable results in one study. Confounding factors were evident across studies. Management of refeeding syndrome risk is becoming increasingly debated. Recent research has questioned the need for prolonged high thiamin dosages in adult patients with eating disorders. Conservative feeding practices are also called into question when serum electrolyte levels can be monitored and replaced assertively.
Summary: Clinical practice and research in refeeding syndrome is slowly changing, with a focus on preventing unnecessary and prolonged underfeeding in malnourished patients and in children during critical stages of growth. Future research should ensure risk criteria is specific to the clinical conditions and/or age groups being investigated. Refeeding syndrome and its subsequent management should also be considered along a spectrum, rather than as an all or nothing event. By incorporating these recommendations, research in the field will evolve to advance knowledge and enhance clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.