Risk, management and future directions for refeeding syndrome and enteral nutrition, an adult and paediatric perspective.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Kylie Matthews-Rensch, Julie Leake
{"title":"Risk, management and future directions for refeeding syndrome and enteral nutrition, an adult and paediatric perspective.","authors":"Kylie Matthews-Rensch, Julie Leake","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The purpose of this review was to summarise recent relevant studies examining refeeding syndrome risk and related outcomes in patients provided with enteral nutrition and discuss considerations for clinical practice and future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies investigating enteral nutrition and refeeding syndrome were heterogeneous. With the exception of physical indicators of nutritional status, there was no agreement across studies regarding commonly agreed upon risk factors including periods of fasting, feeding rates, or specific medical conditions. Comparisons of three different recommended risk criteria had highly variable results in one study. Confounding factors were evident across studies. Management of refeeding syndrome risk is becoming increasingly debated. Recent research has questioned the need for prolonged high thiamin dosages in adult patients with eating disorders. Conservative feeding practices are also called into question when serum electrolyte levels can be monitored and replaced assertively.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Clinical practice and research in refeeding syndrome is slowly changing, with a focus on preventing unnecessary and prolonged underfeeding in malnourished patients and in children during critical stages of growth. Future research should ensure risk criteria is specific to the clinical conditions and/or age groups being investigated. Refeeding syndrome and its subsequent management should also be considered along a spectrum, rather than as an all or nothing event. By incorporating these recommendations, research in the field will evolve to advance knowledge and enhance clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":"29 5","pages":"469-474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The purpose of this review was to summarise recent relevant studies examining refeeding syndrome risk and related outcomes in patients provided with enteral nutrition and discuss considerations for clinical practice and future research.

Recent findings: Recent studies investigating enteral nutrition and refeeding syndrome were heterogeneous. With the exception of physical indicators of nutritional status, there was no agreement across studies regarding commonly agreed upon risk factors including periods of fasting, feeding rates, or specific medical conditions. Comparisons of three different recommended risk criteria had highly variable results in one study. Confounding factors were evident across studies. Management of refeeding syndrome risk is becoming increasingly debated. Recent research has questioned the need for prolonged high thiamin dosages in adult patients with eating disorders. Conservative feeding practices are also called into question when serum electrolyte levels can be monitored and replaced assertively.

Summary: Clinical practice and research in refeeding syndrome is slowly changing, with a focus on preventing unnecessary and prolonged underfeeding in malnourished patients and in children during critical stages of growth. Future research should ensure risk criteria is specific to the clinical conditions and/or age groups being investigated. Refeeding syndrome and its subsequent management should also be considered along a spectrum, rather than as an all or nothing event. By incorporating these recommendations, research in the field will evolve to advance knowledge and enhance clinical practice.

再喂养综合征和肠内营养的风险,管理和未来方向,成人和儿科的观点。
综述目的:本综述的目的是总结最近有关肠内营养患者再喂养综合征风险和相关结局的相关研究,并讨论临床实践和未来研究的注意事项。最近的发现:最近关于肠内营养和再喂养综合征的研究是异质的。除了营养状况的物理指标外,对于包括禁食时间、喂养率或特定医疗条件在内的普遍同意的风险因素,研究没有达成一致。在一项研究中,三种不同推荐风险标准的比较结果差异很大。各种研究的混杂因素都很明显。再喂养综合征风险的管理正变得越来越有争议。最近的研究对饮食失调的成年患者长期服用高剂量维生素的必要性提出了质疑。当血清电解质水平可以监测和果断更换时,保守的喂养方法也受到质疑。摘要:再喂养综合征的临床实践和研究正在缓慢改变,重点是防止营养不良患者和处于生长关键阶段的儿童出现不必要和长期的喂养不足。未来的研究应确保风险标准是针对临床情况和/或被调查年龄组的。再进食综合征及其随后的治疗也应该沿着一个范围来考虑,而不是作为一个全有或全无的事件。通过纳入这些建议,该领域的研究将不断发展,以推进知识和加强临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书