Glenoid Tilt Angle: A Novel and Potential Risk Factor for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-03-19 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-026-01761-x
Shyam Sundar, Mohammed Junaidh, Praveen K Rajan, Amarjeet Singh, Girinivasan Chellamuthu, David V Rajan
{"title":"Glenoid Tilt Angle: A Novel and Potential Risk Factor for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.","authors":"Shyam Sundar, Mohammed Junaidh, Praveen K Rajan, Amarjeet Singh, Girinivasan Chellamuthu, David V Rajan","doi":"10.1007/s43465-026-01761-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The alterations in glenoid morphology have been studied in its axial and coronal planes viz , glenoid version and inclination, respectively, and their significance with respect to shoulder instability has been reported. The glenoid also exhibits an anterior tilt around the scapular axis in the coronal plane, which we refer to as the \"glenoid tilt angle\". The principal objective of this study was to assess glenoid tilt angle in a cohort of Indian population to establish a baseline value and find its clinical significance with respect to anterior shoulder instability. To our knowledge there are no studies in the literature explaining this angle and its implications in shoulder pathologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis was done on consecutive patients who underwent CT for anterior shoulder instability (Group 1, <i>n</i> = 100) and for other non-glenoid shoulder pathologies (Group 2, <i>n</i> = 100). Glenoid tilt and spinoglenoid distance were measured on lateral en face view of 3D-CT, while glenoid version and spinoglenoid angle were measured on axial view of CT. For group comparisons, independent samples t-tests were employed to analyse differences in all four parameters between the instability and control groups, reporting means, standard deviations, t-values, and p-values. The Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test was used for the glenoid version, suggesting a non-normal distribution of this variable, with additional median and interquartile range reporting. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between glenoid tilt angle and glenoid version, as well as between spinoglenoid distance and spinoglenoid angle, both overall and within each group separately. Inter-observer reliability for glenoid tilt angle was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on a two-way random effects model with absolute agreement.</p><p><strong>Reults: </strong>In Group 1, the mean glenoid tilt angle was 25.1° ± 6.9°, the mean glenoid version was 1.84° ± 5.43°, the mean spinoglenoid distance was 18.6 ± 4.3 and the mean spinoglenoid angle was 31.6 ± 6. In Group 2, the mean glenoid tilt angle was 20.3° ± 7.1°, mean glenoid version was 1.46° ± 5.51°, mean spinoglenoid distance was 17.9 ± 4.6, and mean spinoglenoid angle was 30.0 ± 5.4. Between both the groups, differences were statistically significant for glenoid tilt angle with a <i>P</i> value of < 0.001. Inter-observer reliability for glenoid tilt angle measurement was excellent (ICC = 0.98) indicating high measurement reproducibility. In a reduced multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age and sex, glenoid tilt angle demonstrated an independent positive association with anterior shoulder instability (adjusted OR 1.04 per degree). Correlational analysis showed stronger negative correlation between the glenoid tilt angle and glenoid version (<i>r</i> = - 0.253, <i>p</i> = 0.011) in the instability group. For other parameters, these correlations were weaker and not statistically significant in instability as well as the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The glenoid tilt angle will be increased in patients with anterior shoulder instability. It may act as a non-modifiable anatomical risk factor of anterior shoulder instability. The glenoid tilt angle provides a new perspective on glenoid morphology in unstable shoulders and its biomechanical evaluation will certainly yield a better understanding about glenohumeral instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"60 8","pages":"1908-1916"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13438495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-026-01761-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The alterations in glenoid morphology have been studied in its axial and coronal planes viz , glenoid version and inclination, respectively, and their significance with respect to shoulder instability has been reported. The glenoid also exhibits an anterior tilt around the scapular axis in the coronal plane, which we refer to as the "glenoid tilt angle". The principal objective of this study was to assess glenoid tilt angle in a cohort of Indian population to establish a baseline value and find its clinical significance with respect to anterior shoulder instability. To our knowledge there are no studies in the literature explaining this angle and its implications in shoulder pathologies.

Methods: Retrospective analysis was done on consecutive patients who underwent CT for anterior shoulder instability (Group 1, n = 100) and for other non-glenoid shoulder pathologies (Group 2, n = 100). Glenoid tilt and spinoglenoid distance were measured on lateral en face view of 3D-CT, while glenoid version and spinoglenoid angle were measured on axial view of CT. For group comparisons, independent samples t-tests were employed to analyse differences in all four parameters between the instability and control groups, reporting means, standard deviations, t-values, and p-values. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the glenoid version, suggesting a non-normal distribution of this variable, with additional median and interquartile range reporting. Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between glenoid tilt angle and glenoid version, as well as between spinoglenoid distance and spinoglenoid angle, both overall and within each group separately. Inter-observer reliability for glenoid tilt angle was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on a two-way random effects model with absolute agreement.

Reults: In Group 1, the mean glenoid tilt angle was 25.1° ± 6.9°, the mean glenoid version was 1.84° ± 5.43°, the mean spinoglenoid distance was 18.6 ± 4.3 and the mean spinoglenoid angle was 31.6 ± 6. In Group 2, the mean glenoid tilt angle was 20.3° ± 7.1°, mean glenoid version was 1.46° ± 5.51°, mean spinoglenoid distance was 17.9 ± 4.6, and mean spinoglenoid angle was 30.0 ± 5.4. Between both the groups, differences were statistically significant for glenoid tilt angle with a P value of < 0.001. Inter-observer reliability for glenoid tilt angle measurement was excellent (ICC = 0.98) indicating high measurement reproducibility. In a reduced multivariate logistic regression model adjusting for age and sex, glenoid tilt angle demonstrated an independent positive association with anterior shoulder instability (adjusted OR 1.04 per degree). Correlational analysis showed stronger negative correlation between the glenoid tilt angle and glenoid version (r = - 0.253, p = 0.011) in the instability group. For other parameters, these correlations were weaker and not statistically significant in instability as well as the control group.

Conclusion: The glenoid tilt angle will be increased in patients with anterior shoulder instability. It may act as a non-modifiable anatomical risk factor of anterior shoulder instability. The glenoid tilt angle provides a new perspective on glenoid morphology in unstable shoulders and its biomechanical evaluation will certainly yield a better understanding about glenohumeral instability.

肩关节倾斜角度:肩关节前侧不稳定的一个新的潜在危险因素。
背景:已经分别在关节轴面和冠状面研究了关节盂形态的改变,即关节盂的形状和倾斜,并报道了它们对肩部不稳定的意义。肩胛盂也在冠状面上沿肩胛轴前倾,我们称之为“肩胛盂倾斜角”。本研究的主要目的是评估印度人群的肩关节倾斜角度,以建立基线值,并发现其与前肩不稳的临床意义。据我们所知,在文献中没有研究解释这个角度及其对肩部病理的影响。方法:回顾性分析连续接受CT检查的肩部前路不稳患者(第1组,n = 100)和其他非肩关节病变患者(第2组,n = 100)。在3D-CT侧面视图上测量关节关节倾斜和脊柱关节距离,在CT轴向视图上测量关节关节形态和脊柱关节角度。对于组比较,采用独立样本t检验来分析不稳定组与对照组、报告均值、标准差、t值和p值之间所有四个参数的差异。Mann-Whitney U检验用于关节盂的版本,表明该变量的非正态分布,有额外的中位数和四分位数范围报告。采用Pearson相关分析分别检测各组整体和组内肩关节倾斜角度和肩关节形态之间的关系,以及肩关节距离和肩关节角度之间的关系。基于绝对一致的双向随机效应模型,使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估肩关节倾斜角度的观察者间可靠性。结果:组1平均关节盂倾斜角度为25.1°±6.9°,平均关节盂形态为1.84°±5.43°,平均关节盂距离为18.6±4.3,平均关节盂角度为31.6±6。2组平均关节盂倾斜角度为20.3°±7.1°,平均关节盂形态为1.46°±5.51°,平均脊柱盂距离为17.9±4.6,平均脊柱盂角度为30.0±5.4。两组关节不稳组肩关节倾斜角度差异有统计学意义(P值r = - 0.253, P = 0.011)。对于其他参数,这些相关性较弱,在不稳定组和对照组中没有统计学意义。结论:前路肩关节不稳患者肩关节关节倾斜角度增大。它可能是前肩不稳定的不可改变的解剖学危险因素。肩关节倾斜角度为不稳定肩关节形态研究提供了新的视角,其生物力学评价将有助于更好地理解肩关节不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书