Correction to “Cognitive Triad and Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies”

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
{"title":"Correction to “Cognitive Triad and Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n <span>Huang, Z.</span>, <span>Zhu, Y.</span>, <span>Feng, L.</span>, <span>Cui, L.</span>, <span>Wang, Z.</span>, <span>Fu, Z.</span>, &amp; <span>Tang, X.</span> (<span>2026</span>). <span>Cognitive Triad and Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies</span>. <i>Clinical Psychology &amp; Psychotherapy</i>, <span>33</span>, e70282.\n </p><p>In the Abstract, numerical values from an earlier version of the analysis were inadvertently retained. The following text was incorrect:</p><p>1. “Fifty-nine cross-sectional studies (132 effect sizes) were included, demonstrating a strong overall association between the cognitive triad and depressive symptoms (<i>r</i> = 0.596, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.546, 0.622]).”</p><p>This should have read: “Fifty-nine cross-sectional studies (131 effect sizes) were included, demonstrating a strong overall association between the cognitive triad and depressive symptoms (<i>r</i> = 0.586, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.546, 0.622]).”</p><p>2. “Preliminary results suggested that depressive symptoms at Time 1 predicted more negative cognitive triad scores at Time 2 (<i>β</i> = 0.160, 95% CI [0.100, 0.220]).”</p><p>This should have read: “Preliminary results suggested that depressive symptoms at Time 1 predicted more negative cognitive triad scores at Time 2 (<i>β</i> = 0.160, 95% CI [0.101, 0.220]).”</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13446230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Huang, Z., Zhu, Y., Feng, L., Cui, L., Wang, Z., Fu, Z., & Tang, X. (2026). Cognitive Triad and Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 33, e70282.

In the Abstract, numerical values from an earlier version of the analysis were inadvertently retained. The following text was incorrect:

1. “Fifty-nine cross-sectional studies (132 effect sizes) were included, demonstrating a strong overall association between the cognitive triad and depressive symptoms (r = 0.596, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.546, 0.622]).”

This should have read: “Fifty-nine cross-sectional studies (131 effect sizes) were included, demonstrating a strong overall association between the cognitive triad and depressive symptoms (r = 0.586, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.546, 0.622]).”

2. “Preliminary results suggested that depressive symptoms at Time 1 predicted more negative cognitive triad scores at Time 2 (β = 0.160, 95% CI [0.100, 0.220]).”

This should have read: “Preliminary results suggested that depressive symptoms at Time 1 predicted more negative cognitive triad scores at Time 2 (β = 0.160, 95% CI [0.101, 0.220]).”

We apologize for this error.

更正“认知三合一与抑郁:横断面与纵向研究的荟萃分析”。
黄忠,朱勇,冯磊,崔磊,王忠,付忠,唐翔(2026)。认知三联症与抑郁症:横断面和纵向研究的荟萃分析。临床心理学与心理治疗,33,70 - 82。在摘要中,无意中保留了早期分析版本的数值。下面的文本是不正确的:“纳入了59个横断面研究(132个效应量),表明认知三联征与抑郁症状之间存在很强的整体关联(r = 0.596, 95%可信区间,CI[0.546, 0.622])。”这应该是这样写的:“包括59个横断面研究(131个效应量),表明认知三联症和抑郁症状之间存在很强的整体关联(r = 0.586, 95%可信区间,CI[0.546, 0.622])。”“初步结果表明,第1时间的抑郁症状预示着第2时间的认知三联征得分更负(β = 0.160, 95% CI[0.100, 0.220])。”这应该是这样写的:“初步结果表明,第1时间的抑郁症状预示着第2时间的认知三联征得分更负(β = 0.160, 95% CI[0.101, 0.220])。”我们为这个错误道歉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书