{"title":"Efficacy of autologous serum in managing post-cataract dry eye: an in vivo confocal microscopy-based comparative analysis.","authors":"Ahmet Alp Bilgic, Emrah Utku Kabatas, Huri Sabur","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2026.2711803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Postoperative dry eye disease is a common and clinically significant complication of cataract surgery that can impair visual recovery and reduce patient quality of life. Effective management of ocular surface inflammation in this patient population remains an important challenge in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this work is to compare the efficacy of 20% autologous serum and 0.15% preservative-free sodium hyaluronate in managing iatrogenic dry eye disease after cataract surgery, with ocular surface inflammation assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, non-randomised comparative study included 46 patients who developed dry eye disease within one month after phacoemulsification, receiving either 20% autologous serum (<i>n</i> = 24) or 0.15% sodium hyaluronate (<i>n</i> = 22) five times daily for four weeks. Outcomes included Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, tear meniscus height and area, and subbasal dendritic cell density by in vivo confocal microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups achieved significant improvements in all parameters (<i>p</i> < 0.05). At one month, autologous serum showed greater improvements than sodium hyaluronate in Ocular Surface Disease Index (11.4 ± 6.0 vs. 19.4 ± 8.3; <i>p</i> < 0.001), tear break-up time (9.98 ± 2.72 vs. 8.17 ± 2.56 s; <i>p</i> = 0.019), corneal fluorescein staining (0.67 ± 0.64 vs. 1.23 ± 0.53; <i>p</i> = 0.003), tear meniscus height (326.2 ± 50.4 vs. 284.1 ± 44.8 µm; <i>p</i> = 0.005), and dendritic cell density (37.9 ± 15.8 vs. 52.7 ± 18.6 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.003), with a greater mean reduction in dendritic cell density (-29.1 ± 6.6 vs. -14.0 ± 7.2 cells/mm<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with sodium hyaluronate, 20% autologous serum was associated with greater improvements in clinical outcomes and a greater reduction in dendritic cell density, providing objective microstructural evidence of reduced ocular surface inflammation. Prospective randomised studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2026.2711803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clinical relevance: Postoperative dry eye disease is a common and clinically significant complication of cataract surgery that can impair visual recovery and reduce patient quality of life. Effective management of ocular surface inflammation in this patient population remains an important challenge in clinical practice.
Background: The aim of this work is to compare the efficacy of 20% autologous serum and 0.15% preservative-free sodium hyaluronate in managing iatrogenic dry eye disease after cataract surgery, with ocular surface inflammation assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy.
Methods: This retrospective, non-randomised comparative study included 46 patients who developed dry eye disease within one month after phacoemulsification, receiving either 20% autologous serum (n = 24) or 0.15% sodium hyaluronate (n = 22) five times daily for four weeks. Outcomes included Ocular Surface Disease Index, tear break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, tear meniscus height and area, and subbasal dendritic cell density by in vivo confocal microscopy.
Results: Both groups achieved significant improvements in all parameters (p < 0.05). At one month, autologous serum showed greater improvements than sodium hyaluronate in Ocular Surface Disease Index (11.4 ± 6.0 vs. 19.4 ± 8.3; p < 0.001), tear break-up time (9.98 ± 2.72 vs. 8.17 ± 2.56 s; p = 0.019), corneal fluorescein staining (0.67 ± 0.64 vs. 1.23 ± 0.53; p = 0.003), tear meniscus height (326.2 ± 50.4 vs. 284.1 ± 44.8 µm; p = 0.005), and dendritic cell density (37.9 ± 15.8 vs. 52.7 ± 18.6 cells/mm2; p = 0.003), with a greater mean reduction in dendritic cell density (-29.1 ± 6.6 vs. -14.0 ± 7.2 cells/mm2; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Compared with sodium hyaluronate, 20% autologous serum was associated with greater improvements in clinical outcomes and a greater reduction in dendritic cell density, providing objective microstructural evidence of reduced ocular surface inflammation. Prospective randomised studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
临床相关性:术后干眼病是白内障手术常见且临床意义重大的并发症,可损害视力恢复并降低患者的生活质量。有效管理眼表炎症的患者群体仍然是一个重要的挑战,在临床实践中。背景:本研究的目的是比较20%自体血清和0.15%不含防腐剂的透明质酸钠治疗白内障术后医源性干眼病的疗效,并用体内共聚焦显微镜评估眼表炎症。方法:这项回顾性、非随机对照研究纳入46例超声乳化术后1个月内出现干眼症的患者,接受20%自体血清(n = 24)或0.15%透明质酸钠(n = 22)治疗,每天5次,持续4周。结果包括眼表疾病指数、泪液破裂时间、角膜荧光素染色、泪液半月板高度和面积、基底下树突状细胞密度。结果:两组在角膜荧光素染色(0.67±0.64 vs. 1.23±0.53,p = 0.003)、撕裂半月板高度(326.2±50.4 vs. 284.1±44.8µm, p = 0.005)、树突状细胞密度(37.9±15.8 vs. 52.7±18.6 cells/mm2, p = 0.003)、树突状细胞密度(-29.1±6.6 vs. -14.0±7.2 cells/mm2)、树突状细胞密度(-29.1±6.6 vs. -14.0±7.2 cells/mm2)均有显著改善(p p p = 0.019);p结论:与透明质酸钠相比,20%自体血清与临床结果的更大改善和树突状细胞密度的更大降低相关,为减少眼表炎症提供了客观的显微结构证据。有必要进行前瞻性随机研究来证实这些发现。
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.