{"title":"Gastric microbiota composition and its association with rescue eradication outcomes in refractory Helicobacter pylori infection.","authors":"Chia-Jung Kuo, Ngoc-Niem Bui, Yuan-Ming Yeh, Cheng-Yu Lin, Shih-Yu Wu, Wey-Ran Lin, Ming-Ling Chang, Cheng-Tang Chiu, Cheng-Hsun Chiu, Chih-Ho Lai","doi":"10.1016/j.bj.2026.101023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between gastric microbiota composition, Helicobacter pylori infection, and eradication outcomes remains unclear. This study aims to explore the association of gastric microbiota composition among patients with refractory H. pylori infection with the outcomes of rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients who failed to respond to second- or third-line eradication therapies were prospectively enrolled. The composition of the gastric microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing prior to rescue therapy. The eradication outcomes were confirmed using the [<sup>13</sup>C]-urea breath test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,590 screened participants, 23 patients with refractory H. pylori infection who underwent rescue therapy based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing were enrolled. The alpha diversity did not differ between success and failure groups; however, the beta diversity analysis revealed a distinct microbial composition. The success group was enriched in Streptococcus, Neisseria, Cutibacterium, and Staphylococcus, with two significant species, Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus cristatus. In contrast, Prevotella colorans was enriched in the failure group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distinct gastric microbiota signatures were associated with treatment outcomes in patients with refractory H. pylori infection. These findings provide insights that may facilitate the development of microbiota-based diagnostics and interventions to improve eradication success.</p>","PeriodicalId":8934,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101023"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2026.101023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The relationship between gastric microbiota composition, Helicobacter pylori infection, and eradication outcomes remains unclear. This study aims to explore the association of gastric microbiota composition among patients with refractory H. pylori infection with the outcomes of rescue therapy.
Material and methods: Patients who failed to respond to second- or third-line eradication therapies were prospectively enrolled. The composition of the gastric microbiota was analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing prior to rescue therapy. The eradication outcomes were confirmed using the [13C]-urea breath test.
Results: Among 1,590 screened participants, 23 patients with refractory H. pylori infection who underwent rescue therapy based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing were enrolled. The alpha diversity did not differ between success and failure groups; however, the beta diversity analysis revealed a distinct microbial composition. The success group was enriched in Streptococcus, Neisseria, Cutibacterium, and Staphylococcus, with two significant species, Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus cristatus. In contrast, Prevotella colorans was enriched in the failure group.
Conclusions: Distinct gastric microbiota signatures were associated with treatment outcomes in patients with refractory H. pylori infection. These findings provide insights that may facilitate the development of microbiota-based diagnostics and interventions to improve eradication success.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Journal publishes 6 peer-reviewed issues per year in all fields of clinical and biomedical sciences for an internationally diverse authorship. Unlike most open access journals, which are free to readers but not authors, Biomedical Journal does not charge for subscription, submission, processing or publication of manuscripts, nor for color reproduction of photographs.
Clinical studies, accounts of clinical trials, biomarker studies, and characterization of human pathogens are within the scope of the journal, as well as basic studies in model species such as Escherichia coli, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and Mus musculus revealing the function of molecules, cells, and tissues relevant for human health. However, articles on other species can be published if they contribute to our understanding of basic mechanisms of biology.
A highly-cited international editorial board assures timely publication of manuscripts. Reviews on recent progress in biomedical sciences are commissioned by the editors.