Pathology goes viral: a qualitative review of #pathology content on TikTok.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Riley Jepkema, Meredith Herman, Sanjay Gadasalli, Sean Hacking, Julia Kochanowski, Casey Schukow, Kamran Mirza
{"title":"Pathology goes viral: a qualitative review of #pathology content on TikTok.","authors":"Riley Jepkema, Meredith Herman, Sanjay Gadasalli, Sean Hacking, Julia Kochanowski, Casey Schukow, Kamran Mirza","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqag065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The use of #pathology and #pathologist is increasing on TikTok, a short-form video platform with over 1 billion users. As of July 2024, #pathology had over 21 000 posts and 468 million views, while #pathologist had over 3000 posts. It could be a useful tool for education and recruitment if the content is accurate and engaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the accuracy, engagement, and educational value of this growing content, we conducted a cross-sectional study analyzing 105 English-language TikTok videos identified using these keywords over a 72-hour period. Videos were evaluated using the Patient Education Assessment Tool for audiovisual material (PEMAT-AV) for audiovisual quality, the Global Quality Scale (GQS) for overall content quality, and a modified JAMA benchmark score for information accountability. Additionally, a harm-benefit score categorized educational impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed that educational content demonstrated significantly higher quality scores on GQS (P = .0001) and PEMAT-AV (P = .0007) than other content types. In contrast, medical profile type was associated with higher PEMAT-AV (P = .0147), JAMA (P = .0332), and harm-benefit (P = .0004) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the volume of pathology-specific content is currently limited, the high average engagement metrics-298 100 followers, 1.5 million views, and 67 884 likes per video-indicate substantial user interest. The higher-quality scores for educational and medical content suggest that pathology content creators are generally knowledgeable and accurately represent the field on TikTok, highlighting TikTok's potential as a valuable platform for disseminating reliable pathology-related information.</p>","PeriodicalId":7506,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical pathology","volume":"166 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqag065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The use of #pathology and #pathologist is increasing on TikTok, a short-form video platform with over 1 billion users. As of July 2024, #pathology had over 21 000 posts and 468 million views, while #pathologist had over 3000 posts. It could be a useful tool for education and recruitment if the content is accurate and engaging.

Methods: To assess the accuracy, engagement, and educational value of this growing content, we conducted a cross-sectional study analyzing 105 English-language TikTok videos identified using these keywords over a 72-hour period. Videos were evaluated using the Patient Education Assessment Tool for audiovisual material (PEMAT-AV) for audiovisual quality, the Global Quality Scale (GQS) for overall content quality, and a modified JAMA benchmark score for information accountability. Additionally, a harm-benefit score categorized educational impact.

Results: Statistical analysis revealed that educational content demonstrated significantly higher quality scores on GQS (P = .0001) and PEMAT-AV (P = .0007) than other content types. In contrast, medical profile type was associated with higher PEMAT-AV (P = .0147), JAMA (P = .0332), and harm-benefit (P = .0004) scores.

Conclusions: While the volume of pathology-specific content is currently limited, the high average engagement metrics-298 100 followers, 1.5 million views, and 67 884 likes per video-indicate substantial user interest. The higher-quality scores for educational and medical content suggest that pathology content creators are generally knowledgeable and accurately represent the field on TikTok, highlighting TikTok's potential as a valuable platform for disseminating reliable pathology-related information.

病理学走红:对TikTok上#病理学内容的定性分析。
目标:在拥有超过10亿用户的短视频平台TikTok上,#pathology和#pathologist的使用量正在增加。截至2024年7月,#病理学有超过21000个帖子和4.68亿浏览量,而#病理学家有超过3000个帖子。如果内容准确且引人入胜,它可能成为教育和招聘的有用工具。方法:为了评估这些不断增长的内容的准确性、参与度和教育价值,我们进行了一项横断面研究,分析了72小时内使用这些关键词识别的105个英语TikTok视频。视频的视听质量使用患者教育评估工具(PEMAT-AV)进行评估,整体内容质量使用全球质量量表(GQS)进行评估,信息问责性使用修改后的JAMA基准评分。此外,还对教育影响进行了损益分类。结果:统计分析显示,教育内容在GQS (P = 0.0001)和PEMAT-AV (P = 0.0007)上的质量得分显著高于其他内容类型。相反,医学概况类型与较高的PEMAT-AV相关(P =。[0147], jama (p =。(P = 0.0004)。结论:虽然目前特定病理内容的数量有限,但高平均用户粘性指标(游戏邦注:每段视频有298,100名粉丝,150万浏览量和67 884个赞)表明用户对该游戏非常感兴趣。教育和医疗内容的高质量分数表明,病理学内容创作者通常知识丰富,并准确地代表了TikTok上的领域,这突显了TikTok作为传播可靠病理相关信息的有价值平台的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP) is the official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists. It is a leading international journal for publication of articles concerning novel anatomic pathology and laboratory medicine observations on human disease. AJCP emphasizes articles that focus on the application of evolving technologies for the diagnosis and characterization of diseases and conditions, as well as those that have a direct link toward improving patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书