{"title":"TRANSCUTANEOUS AURICULAR VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION INCREASES EMPATHIC CHOICE TOWARD OUTGROUP NEGATIVE EMOTIONS.","authors":"June Christoph Kang","doi":"10.1017/neu.2026.10091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates empathic choice, and whether any such effect differs for ingroup versus outgroup targets, in a single-session behavioural experiment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight healthy East Asian participants were randomly assigned to active taVNS or sham stimulation groups. After 15 minutes of stimulation, participants completed an adapted Empathy Selection Task (EST), choosing to empathize with or describe facial expressions of ingroup (Asian) and outgroup (African) targets displaying negative emotions. Because the design was exploratory and the sample small, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a binomial distribution and logit link, modeling subject-level random intercepts, was used and effects are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sham group showed significantly lower empathic choice than the active group (<i>β</i> = -0.82; OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.22, 0.90], <i>p</i> = 0.024). The main effect of target ethnicity was non-significant (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.60, 1.28], <i>p</i> = 0.494), indicating no detectable baseline ingroup bias. A group × ethnicity interaction (OR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.01, 3.00], <i>p</i> = 0.048) indicated that the taVNS effect was selectively larger for outgroup targets; this pattern survived parametric bootstrap (bootstrap <i>p</i> = 0.022) and Bayesian reanalysis (96.7% of the posterior above zero), though its credible interval narrowly included no effect, marking it as supported but not decisive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>taVNS may increase motivational empathy and selectively enhance empathic choice toward outgroup negative emotions. These exploratory findings are consistent with, but do not directly test, the aversiveness reduction hypothesis, and require replication with autonomic measures and larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2026.10091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates empathic choice, and whether any such effect differs for ingroup versus outgroup targets, in a single-session behavioural experiment.
Methods: Twenty-eight healthy East Asian participants were randomly assigned to active taVNS or sham stimulation groups. After 15 minutes of stimulation, participants completed an adapted Empathy Selection Task (EST), choosing to empathize with or describe facial expressions of ingroup (Asian) and outgroup (African) targets displaying negative emotions. Because the design was exploratory and the sample small, a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) with a binomial distribution and logit link, modeling subject-level random intercepts, was used and effects are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: The sham group showed significantly lower empathic choice than the active group (β = -0.82; OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.22, 0.90], p = 0.024). The main effect of target ethnicity was non-significant (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.60, 1.28], p = 0.494), indicating no detectable baseline ingroup bias. A group × ethnicity interaction (OR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.01, 3.00], p = 0.048) indicated that the taVNS effect was selectively larger for outgroup targets; this pattern survived parametric bootstrap (bootstrap p = 0.022) and Bayesian reanalysis (96.7% of the posterior above zero), though its credible interval narrowly included no effect, marking it as supported but not decisive.
Conclusion: taVNS may increase motivational empathy and selectively enhance empathic choice toward outgroup negative emotions. These exploratory findings are consistent with, but do not directly test, the aversiveness reduction hypothesis, and require replication with autonomic measures and larger samples.
目的:在单次行为实验中,研究经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)是否调节共情选择,以及这种作用在群体内和群体外目标上是否存在差异。方法:28名健康的东亚参与者被随机分为激活taVNS组和假刺激组。在15分钟的刺激后,参与者完成了一项适应性移情选择任务(EST),选择同情或描述表现出负面情绪的内群体(亚洲人)和外群体(非洲人)目标的面部表情。由于设计是探索性的,样本量小,因此使用了二项分布和logit联系的广义线性混合模型(GLMM),对受试者水平的随机截距进行建模,并以95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR)报告效果。结果:假手术组的共情选择明显低于活动组(β = -0.82; OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.22, 0.90], p = 0.024)。目标种族的主要影响不显著(OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.60, 1.28], p = 0.494),表明没有检测到基线组内偏倚。组与种族的相互作用(OR = 1.74, 95% CI [1.01, 3.00], p = 0.048)表明,taVNS对外群体目标的影响选择性更大;该模式在参数引导(bootstrap p = 0.022)和贝叶斯再分析(96.7%的后验高于零)中幸存下来,尽管其可信区间狭窄地不包括任何影响,标志着它是支持的,但不是决定性的。结论:taVNS可增加动机共情,选择性地增强对群外负面情绪的共情选择。这些探索性发现与厌恶减少假说一致,但不能直接检验,需要用自主测量和更大的样本进行复制。
期刊介绍:
Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.