{"title":"Carotid in-stent restenosis and re-restenosis treated with drug-eluting balloon dilation - case report and literature review.","authors":"Benedek Oláh, Csaba Zsolt Oláh","doi":"10.18071/isz.79.0274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to relevant multicenter studies, significant in-stent stenosis develops in 5-6% of cases after internal carotid artery stenting. We present the risks, pathomechanism, diagnostics and treatment options of in-stent stenosis, the evidence, and the discrepancy between conservative and endovascular treatment. If the in-stent stenosis reaches a significant level, repeated endovascular treatment may be considered. The results of drug-eluting balloon dilation are better than balloon dilation. We present the case of a 72-year-old female patient. In an asymptomatic state, 80% stenosis of both internal carotid arteries was confirmed. Both sides were stented without complications. The patient did not have drug resistance, and the patient's compliance was very good. After 4 months, the patient was asymptomatic, and significant bilateral in-stent restenosis was confirmed. We performed drug-eluting balloon dilation in two sessions. In 3 months, we confirmed 85% in-stent restenosis again on the left side, due to which we performed repeated drug-eluting balloon dilation. The patient was asymptomatic and complaintfree. According to the last controls, there is currently no stenosis within the stents. Restenosis in the carotid stent can be effectively managed using drug-eluting balloon dilation, ensuring a high degree of safety. Our case, when a restenosis develops within a short time after drug-eluting ballon dilation, is very rare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"79 7-8","pages":"274-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.79.0274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
According to relevant multicenter studies, significant in-stent stenosis develops in 5-6% of cases after internal carotid artery stenting. We present the risks, pathomechanism, diagnostics and treatment options of in-stent stenosis, the evidence, and the discrepancy between conservative and endovascular treatment. If the in-stent stenosis reaches a significant level, repeated endovascular treatment may be considered. The results of drug-eluting balloon dilation are better than balloon dilation. We present the case of a 72-year-old female patient. In an asymptomatic state, 80% stenosis of both internal carotid arteries was confirmed. Both sides were stented without complications. The patient did not have drug resistance, and the patient's compliance was very good. After 4 months, the patient was asymptomatic, and significant bilateral in-stent restenosis was confirmed. We performed drug-eluting balloon dilation in two sessions. In 3 months, we confirmed 85% in-stent restenosis again on the left side, due to which we performed repeated drug-eluting balloon dilation. The patient was asymptomatic and complaintfree. According to the last controls, there is currently no stenosis within the stents. Restenosis in the carotid stent can be effectively managed using drug-eluting balloon dilation, ensuring a high degree of safety. Our case, when a restenosis develops within a short time after drug-eluting ballon dilation, is very rare.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.