Carotid in-stent restenosis and re-restenosis treated with drug-eluting balloon dilation - case report and literature review.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Benedek Oláh, Csaba Zsolt Oláh
{"title":"Carotid in-stent restenosis and re-restenosis treated with drug-eluting balloon dilation - case report and literature review.","authors":"Benedek Oláh, Csaba Zsolt Oláh","doi":"10.18071/isz.79.0274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>According to relevant multicenter studies, significant in-stent stenosis develops in 5-6% of cases after internal carotid artery stenting. We present the risks, pathomechanism, diagnostics and treatment options of in-stent stenosis, the evidence, and the discrepancy between conservative and endovascular treatment. If the in-stent stenosis reaches a significant level, repeated endovascular treatment may be considered. The results of drug-eluting balloon dilation are better than balloon dilation. We present the case of a 72-year-old female patient. In an asymptomatic state, 80% stenosis of both internal carotid arteries was confirmed. Both sides were stented without complications. The patient did not have drug resistance, and the patient's compliance was very good. After 4 months, the patient was asymptomatic, and significant bilateral in-stent restenosis was confirmed. We performed drug-eluting balloon dilation in two sessions. In 3 months, we confirmed 85% in-stent restenosis again on the left side, due to which we performed repeated drug-eluting balloon dilation. The patient was asymptomatic and complaintfree. According to the last controls, there is currently no stenosis within the stents. Restenosis in the carotid stent can be effectively managed using drug-eluting balloon dilation, ensuring a high degree of safety. Our case, when a restenosis develops within a short time after drug-eluting ballon dilation, is very rare.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"79 7-8","pages":"274-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.79.0274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to relevant multicenter studies, significant in-stent stenosis develops in 5-6% of cases after internal carotid artery stenting. We present the risks, pathomechanism, diagnostics and treatment options of in-stent stenosis, the evidence, and the discrepancy between conservative and endovascular treatment. If the in-stent stenosis reaches a significant level, repeated endovascular treatment may be considered. The results of drug-eluting balloon dilation are better than balloon dilation. We present the case of a 72-year-old female patient. In an asymptomatic state, 80% stenosis of both internal carotid arteries was confirmed. Both sides were stented without complications. The patient did not have drug resistance, and the patient's compliance was very good. After 4 months, the patient was asymptomatic, and significant bilateral in-stent restenosis was confirmed. We performed drug-eluting balloon dilation in two sessions. In 3 months, we confirmed 85% in-stent restenosis again on the left side, due to which we performed repeated drug-eluting balloon dilation. The patient was asymptomatic and complaintfree. According to the last controls, there is currently no stenosis within the stents. Restenosis in the carotid stent can be effectively managed using drug-eluting balloon dilation, ensuring a high degree of safety. Our case, when a restenosis develops within a short time after drug-eluting ballon dilation, is very rare.

颈动脉支架内再狭窄和药物洗脱球囊扩张治疗再狭窄1例报告并文献复习。
根据相关的多中心研究,5-6%的颈内动脉支架植入术后出现明显的支架内狭窄。我们介绍了支架内狭窄的风险、病理机制、诊断和治疗方案、证据以及保守和血管内治疗之间的差异。如果支架内狭窄达到明显程度,可以考虑重复血管内治疗。药物洗脱球囊扩张的效果优于球囊扩张。我们提出的情况下,72岁的女性患者。在无症状状态下,80%的颈内动脉狭窄被证实。双侧支架置入无并发症。患者无耐药性,患者依从性很好。4个月后,患者无症状,确认双侧支架内再狭窄。我们进行了两次药物洗脱球囊扩张术。3个月后,我们再次确认85%的左侧支架内再狭窄,因此我们进行了多次药物洗脱球囊扩张。患者无症状,无主诉。根据最后一组对照,目前支架内没有狭窄。药物洗脱球囊扩张可以有效地处理颈动脉支架内的再狭窄,保证了高度的安全性。我们的病例,当药物洗脱球囊扩张后短时间内再狭窄发生,是非常罕见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书