Difficulty and Deviation. High Task Failure Encourages Alternative Approaches to Learning.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2026.2710702
Dave Bright, Jenny Smith, Philip Kearney, Oliver Runswick
{"title":"Difficulty and Deviation. High Task Failure Encourages Alternative Approaches to Learning.","authors":"Dave Bright, Jenny Smith, Philip Kearney, Oliver Runswick","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2026.2710702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Task difficulty is an important factor in the acquisition of a novel motor skill. When presented with challenging tasks, participants may control task difficulty by deviating from mandated instructions to allow success within a self-selected bandwidth. To investigate the levels of task difficulty at which such deviations may occur, the current study used an on-screen target interception task which gradually increased in difficulty by lowering the size of the intercepting racquet. Measures of intrinsic motivation and cognitive effort were collected to examine the underlying psychological factors. Increases in difficulty provoked a tactical approach from participants where they did not attempt to intercept all targets as instructed. This behaviour was not disclosed when participants were given the opportunity to do so; potential reasons for this are discussed. Increases in task difficulty saw a lowering of intrinsic motivation, but a concurrent rise in cognitive effort, suggesting that task engagement was high despite lowering intrinsic motivation. The results demonstrate that expected experimental results are not necessarily arrived at by the expected means, and that methods of measurement and analysis should account for actual participant behaviour rather than that which is instructed, presumed, or predicted by whichever model or theory is under scrutiny.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"612-625"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2026.2710702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Task difficulty is an important factor in the acquisition of a novel motor skill. When presented with challenging tasks, participants may control task difficulty by deviating from mandated instructions to allow success within a self-selected bandwidth. To investigate the levels of task difficulty at which such deviations may occur, the current study used an on-screen target interception task which gradually increased in difficulty by lowering the size of the intercepting racquet. Measures of intrinsic motivation and cognitive effort were collected to examine the underlying psychological factors. Increases in difficulty provoked a tactical approach from participants where they did not attempt to intercept all targets as instructed. This behaviour was not disclosed when participants were given the opportunity to do so; potential reasons for this are discussed. Increases in task difficulty saw a lowering of intrinsic motivation, but a concurrent rise in cognitive effort, suggesting that task engagement was high despite lowering intrinsic motivation. The results demonstrate that expected experimental results are not necessarily arrived at by the expected means, and that methods of measurement and analysis should account for actual participant behaviour rather than that which is instructed, presumed, or predicted by whichever model or theory is under scrutiny.

难度和偏差。高任务失败鼓励选择学习方法。
任务难度是新运动技能习得的一个重要因素。当面临具有挑战性的任务时,参与者可能会通过偏离规定的指令来控制任务难度,以便在自己选择的带宽内取得成功。为了研究可能发生这种偏差的任务难度水平,本研究使用了一个屏幕上的目标拦截任务,该任务通过降低拦截球拍的大小来逐渐增加难度。收集了内在动机和认知努力的测量来检验潜在的心理因素。难度的增加激起了参与者的战术方法,他们没有尝试按照指示拦截所有目标。当参与者有机会这样做时,这种行为不会被披露;讨论了造成这种情况的潜在原因。任务难度的增加会降低内在动机,但同时会增加认知努力,这表明尽管内在动机降低,但任务参与度很高。结果表明,预期的实验结果不一定是通过预期的手段得出的,测量和分析的方法应该考虑实际的参与者行为,而不是由任何模型或理论所指导、假设或预测的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书