Disentangling Attentional Dynamics in Early Childhood: Response-Based Indicators of Avoidance of and Vigilance to Angry Faces in Relation to Anxiety and Traumatic Stress.

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alysse M Loomis, Damion J Grasso, Kimberly McCarthy, Margaret Briggs-Gowan
{"title":"Disentangling Attentional Dynamics in Early Childhood: Response-Based Indicators of Avoidance of and Vigilance to Angry Faces in Relation to Anxiety and Traumatic Stress.","authors":"Alysse M Loomis, Damion J Grasso, Kimberly McCarthy, Margaret Briggs-Gowan","doi":"10.1007/s10608-025-10640-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Threat-related attentional processes have been highlighted as an important mechanism in the developmental unfolding of childhood anxiety and stress-related disorders. The preschool affective dot probe task is a widely used measure of these attentional processes, however weak psychometric properties have led to inconsistent empirical findings and limited utility in guiding assessment and practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study employs a novel approach to scoring the dot probe task to examine the relationship between dimensions of threat-related attentional processes (e.g., bias, orientation, disengagement), trauma exposure, and child mental health in a sample of 232 preschool children. Young children (ages 4-6) and mothers participated in surveys and an affective dot probe task using emotional faces to measure trauma exposure, mother reports of child anxiety and traumatic stress symptoms, and child-reported traumatic stress. Novel response-based scoring was used to identify vigilance and avoidance indices of threat-related attentional processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More pronounced avoidance (e.g., avoidant orientation) was related to reduced mental health symptoms and more pronounced vigilance (e.g., vigilance bias) was related to higher mental health symptoms, above and beyond the influence of trauma exposure. Trauma exposure moderated the influence of slow disengagement on child anxiety; for children not exposed to trauma, less pronounced slow disengagement was related to lower anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Response-based scoring offers a nuanced understanding of the mechanisms of threat-related bias and child psychopathology, offering a potential alternative to traditional scoring approaches. Future research should examine the temporally dynamic and context-dependent nature of response-based dimensions of threat-related attentional processes and children's psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":"2025 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13435253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-025-10640-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Threat-related attentional processes have been highlighted as an important mechanism in the developmental unfolding of childhood anxiety and stress-related disorders. The preschool affective dot probe task is a widely used measure of these attentional processes, however weak psychometric properties have led to inconsistent empirical findings and limited utility in guiding assessment and practice.

Methods: The current study employs a novel approach to scoring the dot probe task to examine the relationship between dimensions of threat-related attentional processes (e.g., bias, orientation, disengagement), trauma exposure, and child mental health in a sample of 232 preschool children. Young children (ages 4-6) and mothers participated in surveys and an affective dot probe task using emotional faces to measure trauma exposure, mother reports of child anxiety and traumatic stress symptoms, and child-reported traumatic stress. Novel response-based scoring was used to identify vigilance and avoidance indices of threat-related attentional processes.

Results: More pronounced avoidance (e.g., avoidant orientation) was related to reduced mental health symptoms and more pronounced vigilance (e.g., vigilance bias) was related to higher mental health symptoms, above and beyond the influence of trauma exposure. Trauma exposure moderated the influence of slow disengagement on child anxiety; for children not exposed to trauma, less pronounced slow disengagement was related to lower anxiety.

Conclusions: Response-based scoring offers a nuanced understanding of the mechanisms of threat-related bias and child psychopathology, offering a potential alternative to traditional scoring approaches. Future research should examine the temporally dynamic and context-dependent nature of response-based dimensions of threat-related attentional processes and children's psychopathology.

幼儿注意动力学的解开:愤怒面孔的回避和警惕与焦虑和创伤性应激的关系。
背景:威胁相关的注意过程已被强调为儿童焦虑和压力相关障碍发展展开的重要机制。学龄前情感点探测任务是一种广泛使用的注意力过程测量方法,然而,薄弱的心理测量特性导致实证结果不一致,在指导评估和实践方面的效用有限。方法:采用新颖的点探针任务计分方法,对232名学龄前儿童进行威胁相关注意过程(如偏见、定向、脱离)、创伤暴露和儿童心理健康之间的关系进行研究。幼儿(4-6岁)和母亲参与了调查和情感点探测任务,使用情绪面孔来测量创伤暴露,母亲报告的儿童焦虑和创伤应激症状,以及儿童报告的创伤应激。采用新的基于反应的评分方法来识别威胁相关注意过程的警惕和回避指标。结果:更明显的回避(如回避倾向)与减少的心理健康症状有关,更明显的警惕(如警惕偏差)与更高的心理健康症状有关,超出了创伤暴露的影响。创伤暴露可调节缓慢脱离对儿童焦虑的影响;对于没有遭受过创伤的儿童,不太明显的缓慢脱离与较低的焦虑有关。结论:基于反应的评分提供了对威胁相关偏见和儿童精神病理学机制的细致理解,为传统评分方法提供了一种潜在的替代方案。未来的研究应该考察威胁相关注意过程的反应维度和儿童精神病理学的时间动态和情境依赖性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书