Bailey Milne, Susan B Brogly, Jonas Shellenberger, Maria P Velez
{"title":"Infertility and Risk of Congenital Anomalies: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Bailey Milne, Susan B Brogly, Jonas Shellenberger, Maria P Velez","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fertility treatments have been associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies. Most studies have compared births conceived through fertility treatment with unassisted conceptions; consequently, these estimates reflect the combined effects of fertility treatment and the underlying infertility, potentially resulting in confounding by indication.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the association between infertility, independent of fertility treatment, and the risk of congenital anomalies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cohort study included all live births and stillbirths at ≥ 20 weeks' gestation to women aged 15-50 in Ontario, Canada, 2006-2021. Infertility without treatment was defined as a history of one or more infertility consultations with a physician within 2 years before conception, in the absence of fertility treatment. Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (RR) adjusted for maternal age, income quintile, rurality, pre-existing comorbidities, and smoking, alcohol use, and substance use during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,415,324 deliveries, the prevalence of congenital anomalies was 5.3% in unassisted conception and 5.9% among births to women with infertility who did not use fertility treatment. A small increase in risk was observed for any congenital anomaly (RR 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09, 1.14). Among organ system anomalies, the highest relative risks were observed for eye anomalies (0.11% vs 0.14%; RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03, 1.45) and ear, face, and neck anomalies (0.06% vs 0.08%; RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05, 1.35). Among specific anomalies, the highest relative risk was observed for other penile malformations (0.03% vs 0.04%; RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09, 1.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the overall risk of congenital anomalies was low, infants born to women with infertility who did not use fertility treatment had small increased risks of any congenital anomaly, selected organ system anomalies, and specific anomalies compared with infants born from unassisted conceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"700-708"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13522657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fertility treatments have been associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies. Most studies have compared births conceived through fertility treatment with unassisted conceptions; consequently, these estimates reflect the combined effects of fertility treatment and the underlying infertility, potentially resulting in confounding by indication.
Objectives: To estimate the association between infertility, independent of fertility treatment, and the risk of congenital anomalies.
Methods: This population-based cohort study included all live births and stillbirths at ≥ 20 weeks' gestation to women aged 15-50 in Ontario, Canada, 2006-2021. Infertility without treatment was defined as a history of one or more infertility consultations with a physician within 2 years before conception, in the absence of fertility treatment. Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (RR) adjusted for maternal age, income quintile, rurality, pre-existing comorbidities, and smoking, alcohol use, and substance use during pregnancy.
Results: Of the 1,415,324 deliveries, the prevalence of congenital anomalies was 5.3% in unassisted conception and 5.9% among births to women with infertility who did not use fertility treatment. A small increase in risk was observed for any congenital anomaly (RR 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09, 1.14). Among organ system anomalies, the highest relative risks were observed for eye anomalies (0.11% vs 0.14%; RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03, 1.45) and ear, face, and neck anomalies (0.06% vs 0.08%; RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05, 1.35). Among specific anomalies, the highest relative risk was observed for other penile malformations (0.03% vs 0.04%; RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09, 1.83).
Conclusions: Although the overall risk of congenital anomalies was low, infants born to women with infertility who did not use fertility treatment had small increased risks of any congenital anomaly, selected organ system anomalies, and specific anomalies compared with infants born from unassisted conceptions.
背景:生育治疗与先天性异常的风险增加有关。大多数研究比较了通过生育治疗和无辅助受孕的婴儿;因此,这些估计反映了生育治疗和潜在不孕症的综合影响,可能导致适应症混淆。目的:评估独立于生育治疗的不孕症与先天性异常风险之间的关系。方法:这项基于人群的队列研究包括2006-2021年加拿大安大略省15-50岁妇女妊娠≥20周的所有活产和死产。未接受治疗的不孕症被定义为在未接受治疗的情况下,在受孕前2年内与医生进行过一次或多次不孕咨询。修正泊松回归产生的相对危险度(RR)调整了产妇年龄、收入五分位数、农村状况、已有合并症以及怀孕期间吸烟、饮酒和物质使用。结果:在1,415,324例分娩中,先天性异常的发生率在无辅助受孕中为5.3%,在未使用生育治疗的不孕症妇女中为5.9%。任何先天性异常的风险都有小幅增加(RR 1.12, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.09, 1.14)。在器官系统异常中,眼睛异常的相对风险最高(0.11% vs 0.14%; RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03, 1.45),耳、脸和颈部异常的相对风险最高(0.06% vs 0.08%; RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05, 1.35)。在特殊异常中,其他阴茎畸形的相对风险最高(0.03% vs 0.04%; RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.09, 1.83)。结论:尽管先天性异常的总体风险较低,但与未辅助受孕的婴儿相比,未接受生育治疗的不孕症妇女所生婴儿的任何先天性异常、特定器官系统异常和特定异常的风险增加较小。
期刊介绍:
Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.