Outcomes of ERCP for Post-operative Bile Leaks After Cholecystectomy, Hepatectomy, and Liver Transplantation: A High-Volume Tertiary Referral Center Experience.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.1007/s10620-026-10159-6
Azizullah Beran, AbdiGhani Ismail, Mingjun Song, Sujani Yadlapati, Itegbemie Obaitan, John M DeWitt, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Mark A Gromski, James L Watkins, Glen A Lehman, Eugene P Ceppa, Nicholas J Zyromski, Michael G House, Evan L Fogel, Jeffrey J Easler, Nasir Saleem
{"title":"Outcomes of ERCP for Post-operative Bile Leaks After Cholecystectomy, Hepatectomy, and Liver Transplantation: A High-Volume Tertiary Referral Center Experience.","authors":"Azizullah Beran, AbdiGhani Ismail, Mingjun Song, Sujani Yadlapati, Itegbemie Obaitan, John M DeWitt, Mohammad Al-Haddad, Mark A Gromski, James L Watkins, Glen A Lehman, Eugene P Ceppa, Nicholas J Zyromski, Michael G House, Evan L Fogel, Jeffrey J Easler, Nasir Saleem","doi":"10.1007/s10620-026-10159-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile leak (BL) remains one of the major adverse events of hepatobiliary surgeries. We evaluated ERCP outcomes for postoperative BL (PBL) cholecystectomy (C-BL), hepatectomy (H-BL), and liver transplantation (LT-BL) and identified predictors of persistent leak after initial ERCP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes consecutive patients who underwent ERCP for PBL at a single high-volume center (2011-2021). Leaks were graded as low-grade BL (LG-BL) or high-grade BL (HG-BL). Initial success was defined as cholangiographic and clinical resolution of BL following a single therapeutic ERCP session at the first follow-up ERCP. Final success was defined as cholangiographic and clinical resolution of the BL at the last follow-up assessment, irrespective of the number of therapeutic ERCP sessions required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>417 patients with PBLs were included: 348 (83.5%) C-BL, 43 (10.3%) H-BL, and 26 (6.2%) LT-BL. Initial clinical success was 80.7% overall, with the highest in LT-BL (91.7%), followed by C-BL (83.5%), and then H-BL (50%) (p < 0.001). HG-BLs had lower initial success (54.7% vs. 87.8% for LG-BL; p < 0.001). Final success was 96% overall, but lower in H-BL (84.2%) than C-BL (97.3%) and LT-BL (95.8%) (p < 0.001). Overall, HG-BL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.79) and H-BL (aOR 3.52) were independent predictors of persistent leak.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ERCP is effective and safe for PBL. However, initial clinical success varied by surgical etiology and leak severity. HG-BL and H-BL were associated with lower initial success and more frequently required repeated ERCP interventions for leak resolution. Further studies are needed to validate optimal treatment strategies for higher-risk bile leak subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"5812-5823"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10159-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bile leak (BL) remains one of the major adverse events of hepatobiliary surgeries. We evaluated ERCP outcomes for postoperative BL (PBL) cholecystectomy (C-BL), hepatectomy (H-BL), and liver transplantation (LT-BL) and identified predictors of persistent leak after initial ERCP.

Methods: This study includes consecutive patients who underwent ERCP for PBL at a single high-volume center (2011-2021). Leaks were graded as low-grade BL (LG-BL) or high-grade BL (HG-BL). Initial success was defined as cholangiographic and clinical resolution of BL following a single therapeutic ERCP session at the first follow-up ERCP. Final success was defined as cholangiographic and clinical resolution of the BL at the last follow-up assessment, irrespective of the number of therapeutic ERCP sessions required.

Results: 417 patients with PBLs were included: 348 (83.5%) C-BL, 43 (10.3%) H-BL, and 26 (6.2%) LT-BL. Initial clinical success was 80.7% overall, with the highest in LT-BL (91.7%), followed by C-BL (83.5%), and then H-BL (50%) (p < 0.001). HG-BLs had lower initial success (54.7% vs. 87.8% for LG-BL; p < 0.001). Final success was 96% overall, but lower in H-BL (84.2%) than C-BL (97.3%) and LT-BL (95.8%) (p < 0.001). Overall, HG-BL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.79) and H-BL (aOR 3.52) were independent predictors of persistent leak.

Conclusion: ERCP is effective and safe for PBL. However, initial clinical success varied by surgical etiology and leak severity. HG-BL and H-BL were associated with lower initial success and more frequently required repeated ERCP interventions for leak resolution. Further studies are needed to validate optimal treatment strategies for higher-risk bile leak subgroups.

ERCP治疗胆囊切除术、肝切除术和肝移植术后胆汁泄漏的结果:一项大容量三级转诊中心经验。
背景:胆漏是肝胆外科手术的主要不良事件之一。我们评估了术后BL (PBL)、胆囊切除术(C-BL)、肝切除术(H-BL)和肝移植(LT-BL)的ERCP结果,并确定了初始ERCP后持续泄漏的预测因素。方法:本研究包括在单个大容量中心连续接受ERCP治疗PBL的患者(2011-2021)。泄漏被分级为低级别BL (LG-BL)或高级别BL (HG-BL)。最初的成功定义为在第一次随访ERCP中进行一次治疗性ERCP后的胆管造影和BL的临床消退。最终的成功被定义为在最后的随访评估中胆管造影和BL的临床解决,而不考虑所需的ERCP治疗次数。结果:纳入417例pbl患者:C-BL 348例(83.5%),H-BL 43例(10.3%),LT-BL 26例(6.2%)。初步临床成功率为80.7%,其中LT-BL最高(91.7%),C-BL次之(83.5%),H-BL次之(50%)。然而,最初的临床成功因手术病因和泄漏严重程度而异。HG-BL和H-BL的初始成功率较低,并且更频繁地需要重复ERCP干预来解决泄漏。需要进一步的研究来验证高风险胆漏亚组的最佳治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书