Suicide prevention through a SafetyPlan intervention for patients after a suicide attempt or in a suicidal crisis (SAFETY+): a study protocol of a randomised-controlled trial in acute inpatient psychiatric care.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mariam Yunusah, Lena Marie Hensel, Tobias Teismann, Peter Brieger, Hermann Spießl, Yekaterina Pashutina, Sarah Sophia Michna, Chiara Spielmann, Marlene Stadler, Johanna Freund, Susanne Menzel, Chaimae El Hammadi, Johannes Hamann
{"title":"Suicide prevention through a SafetyPlan intervention for patients after a suicide attempt or in a suicidal crisis (SAFETY+): a study protocol of a randomised-controlled trial in acute inpatient psychiatric care.","authors":"Mariam Yunusah, Lena Marie Hensel, Tobias Teismann, Peter Brieger, Hermann Spießl, Yekaterina Pashutina, Sarah Sophia Michna, Chiara Spielmann, Marlene Stadler, Johanna Freund, Susanne Menzel, Chaimae El Hammadi, Johannes Hamann","doi":"10.1186/s12888-026-08483-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals undergoing acute inpatient psychiatric treatment or who have recently been discharged face an especially elevated risk of suicide. Nevertheless, suicide-specific interventions are still not routinely implemented in inpatient psychiatric care in Germany. Safety plan interventions (SPIs), which involve developing individualised safety plans, have been shown to be highly effective in reducing the number of suicide attempts. Due to their simplicity and low resource requirements, they may be suitable for broad implementation. However, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding their effectiveness in inpatient psychiatric settings in Germany. This study addresses this critical research gap by investigating whether the SAFETY+ intervention can reduce suicide attempts within twelve months of discharge from a German inpatient psychiatric setting compared to usual care. Additionally, the research project will focus on the implementation of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed-methods study combines a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative interviews of participants and professionals involved in treatment and study implementation. In the RCT, 450 patients with acute suicidality will be recruited from three large psychiatric clinics in Bavaria. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the SafetyPlan group (n = 225) or the treatment-as-usual group (n = 225). The intervention includes a manualised SafetyPlan intervention (SPI) session during hospitalisation and telephone follow-up sessions one and four weeks after discharge. Data will be collected at five time points: after consenting to participate (T0a) and shortly before discharge (T0b), as well as at follow-ups six weeks (T1), six months (T2) and twelve months (T3) after discharge.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings of this study can be transferred directly into standard psychiatric practice since the study is embedded in routine clinical care. The study encompasses both urban areas (Munich) and rural areas with limited outpatient resources (e.g., the Bavarian Forest region, a rural area in Eastern Bavaria), thereby enhancing the generalisability of the results to other psychiatric care settings with similar structures across Germany. Should the procedure prove effective, the findings may promote future nationwide implementation efforts.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), ID: DRKS00037168, registered on 07 July 2025. URL: https://www.drks.de/DRKS00037168 .</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13435703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08483-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals undergoing acute inpatient psychiatric treatment or who have recently been discharged face an especially elevated risk of suicide. Nevertheless, suicide-specific interventions are still not routinely implemented in inpatient psychiatric care in Germany. Safety plan interventions (SPIs), which involve developing individualised safety plans, have been shown to be highly effective in reducing the number of suicide attempts. Due to their simplicity and low resource requirements, they may be suitable for broad implementation. However, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding their effectiveness in inpatient psychiatric settings in Germany. This study addresses this critical research gap by investigating whether the SAFETY+ intervention can reduce suicide attempts within twelve months of discharge from a German inpatient psychiatric setting compared to usual care. Additionally, the research project will focus on the implementation of the intervention.

Method: This mixed-methods study combines a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with qualitative interviews of participants and professionals involved in treatment and study implementation. In the RCT, 450 patients with acute suicidality will be recruited from three large psychiatric clinics in Bavaria. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the SafetyPlan group (n = 225) or the treatment-as-usual group (n = 225). The intervention includes a manualised SafetyPlan intervention (SPI) session during hospitalisation and telephone follow-up sessions one and four weeks after discharge. Data will be collected at five time points: after consenting to participate (T0a) and shortly before discharge (T0b), as well as at follow-ups six weeks (T1), six months (T2) and twelve months (T3) after discharge.

Discussion: The findings of this study can be transferred directly into standard psychiatric practice since the study is embedded in routine clinical care. The study encompasses both urban areas (Munich) and rural areas with limited outpatient resources (e.g., the Bavarian Forest region, a rural area in Eastern Bavaria), thereby enhancing the generalisability of the results to other psychiatric care settings with similar structures across Germany. Should the procedure prove effective, the findings may promote future nationwide implementation efforts.

Trial registration: This trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), ID: DRKS00037168, registered on 07 July 2025. URL: https://www.drks.de/DRKS00037168 .

通过对自杀未遂或自杀危机(SAFETY+)患者的安全计划干预来预防自杀:急性住院精神病护理中一项随机对照试验的研究方案
背景:正在接受急性住院精神病治疗或最近出院的个体面临着特别高的自杀风险。然而,在德国,针对自杀的干预措施仍未在住院精神病护理中常规实施。安全计划干预(SPIs)涉及制定个性化的安全计划,已被证明在减少自杀企图数量方面非常有效。由于它们的简单性和低资源需求,它们可能适合广泛的实现。然而,目前缺乏证据表明它们在德国精神科住院病人中的有效性。本研究通过调查与常规护理相比,安全+干预是否能减少德国精神病住院患者出院后12个月内的自杀企图,解决了这一关键的研究空白。此外,研究项目将侧重于干预措施的实施。方法:这项混合方法研究结合了随机对照试验(RCT)和参与治疗和研究实施的参与者和专业人员的定性访谈。在随机对照试验中,将从巴伐利亚的三家大型精神病诊所招募450名急性自杀患者。参与者将被随机分配到安全计划组(n = 225)或常规治疗组(n = 225)。干预包括住院期间的手动安全计划干预(SPI)会议和出院后1周和4周的电话随访会议。数据将在五个时间点收集:同意参加后(T0a)和出院前不久(T0b),以及出院后6周(T1)、6个月(T2)和12个月(T3)的随访。讨论:本研究的发现可以直接转化为标准的精神病学实践,因为该研究嵌入了常规临床护理。该研究涵盖了城市地区(慕尼黑)和门诊资源有限的农村地区(例如,巴伐利亚森林地区,巴伐利亚东部的农村地区),从而增强了结果在德国其他具有类似结构的精神科护理机构的普遍性。如果程序证明是有效的,调查结果可能会促进今后在全国范围内的执行工作。试验注册:该试验已在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS)注册,ID: DRKS00037168,于2025年7月7日注册。网址:https://www.drks.de/DRKS00037168。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书