Clinical outcomes following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based therapy compared with surgery in chronic pancreatitis: evidence from a multicentric cohort.

IF 2.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-09 DOI:10.20524/aog.2026.1097
Arkadeep Dhali, Rick Maity, Fayaz Khan, Jyotirmoy Biswas, Sukanta Ray
{"title":"Clinical outcomes following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based therapy compared with surgery in chronic pancreatitis: evidence from a multicentric cohort.","authors":"Arkadeep Dhali, Rick Maity, Fayaz Khan, Jyotirmoy Biswas, Sukanta Ray","doi":"10.20524/aog.2026.1097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real-world comparative outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based endoscopic therapy vs. pancreatic surgery in chronic pancreatitis (CP) remain incompletely defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective comparative effectiveness study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Adults with CP undergoing endoscopic therapy or pancreatic surgery were identified, and propensity score matching generated 1451 patients in each cohort. Outcomes were assessed from 1-1095 days after the index event, using risk-based analyses as the primary comparative summaries and Kaplan-Meier analyses as secondary time-to-event summaries. Outcomes included chronic opioid prescriptions, opioid use disorder (OUD), celiac plexus block/neurolysis, pain codes, acute pancreatitis, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, emergency visits, and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean follow up was 771.494 days for endoscopy and 827.285 days for surgery. New chronic opioid prescriptions occurred in 146/1092 (13.4%) endoscopic vs. 79/1032 (7.7%) surgical patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.396-2.484; P<0.001; hazard ratio [HR] 1.861, 95%CI 1.415-2.448). Acute pancreatitis occurred in 167/530 (31.5%) vs. 65/565 (11.5%) patients (OR 3.539, 95%CI 2.578-4.858; P<0.001; HR 3.341, 95%CI 2.506-4.453). Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency occurred in 200/1213 (16.5%) vs. 132/1206 (10.9%) patients (OR 1.606, 95%CI 1.269-2.034; P<0.001; HR 1.585, 95%CI 1.272-1.975). Endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, mortality, emergency visits, and OUD did not differ significantly between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic therapy was associated with higher chronic opioid prescribing, acute pancreatitis, celiac plexus block/neurolysis, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. These findings are associative and should be interpreted in the context of residual confounding and coding-based outcome ascertainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"39 5","pages":"534-542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13433954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2026.1097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Real-world comparative outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based endoscopic therapy vs. pancreatic surgery in chronic pancreatitis (CP) remain incompletely defined.

Methods: We performed a retrospective comparative effectiveness study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. Adults with CP undergoing endoscopic therapy or pancreatic surgery were identified, and propensity score matching generated 1451 patients in each cohort. Outcomes were assessed from 1-1095 days after the index event, using risk-based analyses as the primary comparative summaries and Kaplan-Meier analyses as secondary time-to-event summaries. Outcomes included chronic opioid prescriptions, opioid use disorder (OUD), celiac plexus block/neurolysis, pain codes, acute pancreatitis, exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, emergency visits, and all-cause mortality.

Results: Mean follow up was 771.494 days for endoscopy and 827.285 days for surgery. New chronic opioid prescriptions occurred in 146/1092 (13.4%) endoscopic vs. 79/1032 (7.7%) surgical patients (odds ratio [OR] 1.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.396-2.484; P<0.001; hazard ratio [HR] 1.861, 95%CI 1.415-2.448). Acute pancreatitis occurred in 167/530 (31.5%) vs. 65/565 (11.5%) patients (OR 3.539, 95%CI 2.578-4.858; P<0.001; HR 3.341, 95%CI 2.506-4.453). Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency occurred in 200/1213 (16.5%) vs. 132/1206 (10.9%) patients (OR 1.606, 95%CI 1.269-2.034; P<0.001; HR 1.585, 95%CI 1.272-1.975). Endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, mortality, emergency visits, and OUD did not differ significantly between cohorts.

Conclusions: Endoscopic therapy was associated with higher chronic opioid prescribing, acute pancreatitis, celiac plexus block/neurolysis, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. These findings are associative and should be interpreted in the context of residual confounding and coding-based outcome ascertainment.

慢性胰腺炎内镜逆行胆管造影治疗与手术治疗的临床结果比较:来自多中心队列的证据
背景:基于内镜逆行胆管造影的内镜治疗与胰腺手术治疗慢性胰腺炎(CP)的实际比较结果尚未完全确定。方法:我们使用TriNetX美国合作网络进行了回顾性比较有效性研究。确定接受内镜治疗或胰腺手术的CP成人,并在每个队列中生成1451例倾向评分匹配患者。结果在指标事件发生后1-1095天进行评估,使用基于风险的分析作为主要的比较总结,Kaplan-Meier分析作为次要的事件时间总结。结果包括慢性阿片类药物处方、阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)、乳糜丛阻滞/神经松解、疼痛、急性胰腺炎、外分泌和内分泌胰功能不全、急诊就诊和全因死亡率。结果:内镜组平均随访771.494天,手术组平均随访827.285天。146/1092(13.4%)内镜患者与79/1032(7.7%)手术患者出现新的慢性阿片类药物处方(优势比[OR] 1.862, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.396-2.484)结论:内镜治疗与慢性阿片类药物处方增加、急性胰腺炎、乳糜丛阻滞/神经松解和外分泌胰功能不全相关。这些发现是相关的,应该在残余混淆和基于编码的结果确定的背景下解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书