From Pilot to Practice: A Checklist Approach to POCUS Training in Family Medicine.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patty Tran, Kana Maeji Carter, Leimomi Kanagusuku, Chien-Wen Tseng, Komal Soin
{"title":"From Pilot to Practice: A Checklist Approach to POCUS Training in Family Medicine.","authors":"Patty Tran, Kana Maeji Carter, Leimomi Kanagusuku, Chien-Wen Tseng, Komal Soin","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2026.296247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in primary care and is now an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education training expectation for family medicine residents. However, standardized methods for teaching, observing, and assessing POCUS skills in clinical settings remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The University of Hawai'i Family Medicine Residency Program developed direct-observation checklists for obstetric (OB) and musculoskeletal (MSK) POCUS. OB assessments included first- and third-trimester scans, while MSK assessments focused on knee and shoulder examinations. Checklist content was adapted from existing validated tools and refined through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The checklists were designed for use before, during, and/or after patient encounters to guide observation and feedback. Faculty and residents completed surveys to evaluate usability, workflow integration, and educational impact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From March to October 2025, 39 checklists (28 OB, 11 MSK) and 60 surveys were collected from faculty and residents at two clinical sites. Most attending physicians reported checklist completion and feedback delivery in less than 5 minutes. Faculty most frequently used the tools postencounter. Perceived utility was high: 76% of OB and 88% of MSK attending responses rated the checklist as very useful, and nearly all residents (95% OB; 100% MSK) reported that the checklists supported a systematic approach and reinforced learning. Time constraints and certain indirectly observable checklist items were identified as implementation challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Structured POCUS teaching checklists are feasible and well-received in family medicine residency training. These tools support direct observation, structured feedback, and standardizing expectations during supervised scanning encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13673202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2026.296247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in primary care and is now an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education training expectation for family medicine residents. However, standardized methods for teaching, observing, and assessing POCUS skills in clinical settings remain limited.

Methods: The University of Hawai'i Family Medicine Residency Program developed direct-observation checklists for obstetric (OB) and musculoskeletal (MSK) POCUS. OB assessments included first- and third-trimester scans, while MSK assessments focused on knee and shoulder examinations. Checklist content was adapted from existing validated tools and refined through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The checklists were designed for use before, during, and/or after patient encounters to guide observation and feedback. Faculty and residents completed surveys to evaluate usability, workflow integration, and educational impact.

Results: From March to October 2025, 39 checklists (28 OB, 11 MSK) and 60 surveys were collected from faculty and residents at two clinical sites. Most attending physicians reported checklist completion and feedback delivery in less than 5 minutes. Faculty most frequently used the tools postencounter. Perceived utility was high: 76% of OB and 88% of MSK attending responses rated the checklist as very useful, and nearly all residents (95% OB; 100% MSK) reported that the checklists supported a systematic approach and reinforced learning. Time constraints and certain indirectly observable checklist items were identified as implementation challenges.

Conclusions: Structured POCUS teaching checklists are feasible and well-received in family medicine residency training. These tools support direct observation, structured feedback, and standardizing expectations during supervised scanning encounters.

从试点到实践:家庭医学POCUS培训的清单方法。
背景和目的:点护理超声(POCUS)越来越多地用于初级保健,现在是研究生医学教育认证委员会对家庭医学住院医师的培训期望。然而,在临床环境中,用于教学、观察和评估POCUS技能的标准化方法仍然有限。方法:夏威夷大学家庭医学住院医师计划制定了产科(OB)和肌肉骨骼(MSK) POCUS的直接观察清单。OB评估包括妊娠早期和妊娠晚期的扫描,而MSK评估侧重于膝关节和肩部检查。检查表内容改编自现有的经过验证的工具,并通过计划-执行-研究-行动循环进行改进。检查表设计用于患者接触之前,期间和/或之后,以指导观察和反馈。教师和住院医生完成了调查,以评估可用性、工作流集成和教育影响。结果:从2025年3月至10月,从两个临床站点的教师和住院医师中收集了39份检查表(28份OB, 11份MSK)和60份调查。大多数主治医生报告在不到5分钟的时间内完成了检查表并提供了反馈。教师最常使用的工具是会面后。感知效用很高:76%的产科医生和88%的MSK医生认为检查表非常有用,几乎所有的住院医生(95%的OB医生;100%的MSK医生)都报告说检查表支持系统的方法和强化的学习。时间限制和某些间接观察到的检查表项目被确定为实现挑战。结论:结构化POCUS教学清单在家庭医学住院医师培训中是可行的,并得到了良好的认可。这些工具支持直接观察、结构化反馈和在监督扫描过程中的标准化期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书