To lyse or not to lyse: biasing bacteriophage behaviors.

IF 11.8 1区 生物学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews Pub Date : 2026-09-24 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.1128/mmbr.00254-25
Rabia Fatima, Gayatri Nair, Amany Al-Anany, Alexander P Hynes
{"title":"To lyse or not to lyse: biasing bacteriophage behaviors.","authors":"Rabia Fatima, Gayatri Nair, Amany Al-Anany, Alexander P Hynes","doi":"10.1128/mmbr.00254-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SUMMARYHow temperate bacteriophages choose between lysis and lysogeny (dormancy) was one of the very first-and remains among the best studied-models of gene regulation. As over 75% of bacteria have a dormant phage within their genomes, the impact of this decision is far-reaching. It is also underappreciated, with much of microbiology studied independently of this decision; for example, the ubiquitous lab <i>E. coli</i> strain K-12 was cured of phage lambda to make it a \"better\" model. Here, we review why phages \"choose\" to lyse or not to lyse, the wide variety of signals they can respond to, how these signals are tapped into by the phage, how the timing of the decision impacts its outcome, and how phages interact around this decision. This decision underpins so much of bacteriology that an understanding of it, and the resulting ability to bias it, will help explain phenomena ranging from failures in culturing bacteria to successes of antibiotic treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18520,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e0025425"},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13602935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00254-25","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SUMMARYHow temperate bacteriophages choose between lysis and lysogeny (dormancy) was one of the very first-and remains among the best studied-models of gene regulation. As over 75% of bacteria have a dormant phage within their genomes, the impact of this decision is far-reaching. It is also underappreciated, with much of microbiology studied independently of this decision; for example, the ubiquitous lab E. coli strain K-12 was cured of phage lambda to make it a "better" model. Here, we review why phages "choose" to lyse or not to lyse, the wide variety of signals they can respond to, how these signals are tapped into by the phage, how the timing of the decision impacts its outcome, and how phages interact around this decision. This decision underpins so much of bacteriology that an understanding of it, and the resulting ability to bias it, will help explain phenomena ranging from failures in culturing bacteria to successes of antibiotic treatments.

裂解或不裂解:噬菌体行为的偏颇。
温带噬菌体如何选择裂解和溶原(休眠)是基因调控的第一个并且仍然是研究得最好的模型之一。由于超过75%的细菌在其基因组中有一个休眠噬菌体,这一决定的影响是深远的。它也被低估了,许多微生物学研究独立于这一决定;例如,普遍存在的实验室大肠杆菌菌株K-12被噬菌体治愈,使其成为“更好”的模型。在这里,我们回顾了为什么噬菌体“选择”裂解或不裂解,它们可以响应的各种信号,这些信号如何被噬菌体利用,决策的时机如何影响其结果,以及噬菌体如何围绕这一决策相互作用。这一决定在很大程度上支撑了细菌学,对它的理解,以及由此产生的偏见能力,将有助于解释从细菌培养失败到抗生素治疗成功的各种现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews (MMBR), a journal that explores the significance and interrelationships of recent discoveries in various microbiology fields, publishes review articles that help both specialists and nonspecialists understand and apply the latest findings in their own research. MMBR covers a wide range of topics in microbiology, including microbial ecology, evolution, parasitology, biotechnology, and immunology. The journal caters to scientists with diverse interests in all areas of microbial science and encompasses viruses, bacteria, archaea, fungi, unicellular eukaryotes, and microbial parasites. MMBR primarily publishes authoritative and critical reviews that push the boundaries of knowledge, appealing to both specialists and generalists. The journal often includes descriptive figures and tables to enhance understanding. Indexed/Abstracted in various databases such as Agricola, BIOSIS Previews, CAB Abstracts, Cambridge Scientific Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Service, Current Contents- Life Sciences, EMBASE, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, Illustrata, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science), Summon, and Scopus, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书