The costs of partner engagement in research: Opportunities for pragmatic research, implementation science, and the science of engagement.

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2026-07-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cts.2026.10784
Liza M Creel, John Cronin, Daniel D Matlock, Russell E Glasgow, Samantha Rubio, Monica Perez Jolles
{"title":"The costs of partner engagement in research: Opportunities for pragmatic research, implementation science, and the science of engagement.","authors":"Liza M Creel, John Cronin, Daniel D Matlock, Russell E Glasgow, Samantha Rubio, Monica Perez Jolles","doi":"10.1017/cts.2026.10784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing emphasis on the importance of active partner engagement in research and the design, planning, and implementation of new programs. Indeed, the science of engagement is gaining is receiving more attention from researchers, being formally included in research studies more often, and increasingly being required by funders. Financial costs and economic implications are well-known drivers of successful adoption, implementation, and sustainment of evidence-based programs; however, partner engagement costs are often excluded from economic evaluations even when elements of engagement may be relevant to sustainment and replication. Resource constraints in both research and practice highlight the need to better understand engagement costs to ensure that scarce resources are put towards the richest engagement activities. As part of the Rapid and Rigorous Patient-Centered Program (R2P2) in Colorado, we designed an approach to systematically document and analyze partner engagement costs across four prototype projects. We describe this approach, summarize needed adaptations, share an interactive data collection template, synthesize the relevant engagement costs during implementation, replication, and sustainment, and discuss lessons learned. Our experiences in R2P2 in costing initial engagement activities across four diverse projects offer direction for future research and practice that balances high-quality partner engagement with efficiency in addressing resource constraints facing researchers and practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"e118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13430481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2026.10784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing emphasis on the importance of active partner engagement in research and the design, planning, and implementation of new programs. Indeed, the science of engagement is gaining is receiving more attention from researchers, being formally included in research studies more often, and increasingly being required by funders. Financial costs and economic implications are well-known drivers of successful adoption, implementation, and sustainment of evidence-based programs; however, partner engagement costs are often excluded from economic evaluations even when elements of engagement may be relevant to sustainment and replication. Resource constraints in both research and practice highlight the need to better understand engagement costs to ensure that scarce resources are put towards the richest engagement activities. As part of the Rapid and Rigorous Patient-Centered Program (R2P2) in Colorado, we designed an approach to systematically document and analyze partner engagement costs across four prototype projects. We describe this approach, summarize needed adaptations, share an interactive data collection template, synthesize the relevant engagement costs during implementation, replication, and sustainment, and discuss lessons learned. Our experiences in R2P2 in costing initial engagement activities across four diverse projects offer direction for future research and practice that balances high-quality partner engagement with efficiency in addressing resource constraints facing researchers and practitioners.

合作伙伴参与研究的成本:务实研究的机会、实施科学和参与科学。
人们越来越强调合作伙伴积极参与研究以及新项目的设计、规划和实施的重要性。事实上,参与科学正在获得越来越多的研究人员的关注,越来越多地被正式纳入研究,越来越多地被资助者所要求。众所周知,财务成本和经济影响是成功采用、实施和维持循证规划的驱动因素;然而,即使参与的要素可能与维持和复制有关,合作伙伴参与成本也经常被排除在经济评估之外。研究和实践中的资源限制突出表明,需要更好地了解审计业务成本,以确保将稀缺资源用于最丰富的审计业务活动。作为科罗拉多州快速和严格的以患者为中心的项目(R2P2)的一部分,我们设计了一种方法来系统地记录和分析四个原型项目的合作伙伴参与成本。我们描述了这种方法,总结了所需的调整,共享了交互式数据收集模板,综合了实施、复制和维持期间的相关参与成本,并讨论了吸取的经验教训。我们在R2P2中对四个不同项目的初始参与活动进行成本核算的经验,为未来的研究和实践提供了方向,可以平衡高质量的合作伙伴参与与解决研究人员和从业人员面临的资源限制的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书