Inpatient Complications and Outcomes for Burn Patients Admitted with Opioid-Positive Drug Screens.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Emily P Swafford, Arman J Fijany, Tyler J Murphy, Punit Vyas, Jordan T Garcia, Jessica Ballou, Robel T Beyene, Stephen Gondek, Anne Wagner, Elizabeth Dale Slater
{"title":"Inpatient Complications and Outcomes for Burn Patients Admitted with Opioid-Positive Drug Screens.","authors":"Emily P Swafford, Arman J Fijany, Tyler J Murphy, Punit Vyas, Jordan T Garcia, Jessica Ballou, Robel T Beyene, Stephen Gondek, Anne Wagner, Elizabeth Dale Slater","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irag126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Opioid use disorder complicates the management of burn injuries, particularly in achieving adequate pain control. While prior single-institution studies have evaluated associations between opioid use and burn outcomes, multi-institutional analyses of inpatient complications remain limited. Using the American Burn Association Noncommercial Burn Research Dataset, this study compares inpatient outcomes among patients with prehospital opioid-positive screening versus those with negative screening. Among 32 052 patients included, 50.5% screened positive for opioids at the time of presentation. These patients were more likely to be female (p < .0001), more likely to possess scald injuries (p < .0001), and less likely to be experiencing homelessness (p < .0001) or to be diagnosed with inhalation injury (p < .005). Opioid positivity was associated with increased odds of infectious complications, such as cellulitis (OR = 2.7, p < .0001) and sepsis (OR = 1.41, p < .001). Opioid negativity, conversely, had a higher prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (p < .0001), acute kidney injury (p < .0001), respiratory failure (p < .05), and cardiac arrest (p < .05). The opioid-negative population also necessitated more frequent admission to the critical care unit (p < .05) and demonstrated higher overall mortality (p < .0001). These findings highlight the vulnerability of opioid-negative patients who may have delayed presentation and more severe injuries than originally anticipated. This work underscores the need for heightened vigilance and equitable, early care for these patients to mitigate risk in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Opioid use disorder complicates the management of burn injuries, particularly in achieving adequate pain control. While prior single-institution studies have evaluated associations between opioid use and burn outcomes, multi-institutional analyses of inpatient complications remain limited. Using the American Burn Association Noncommercial Burn Research Dataset, this study compares inpatient outcomes among patients with prehospital opioid-positive screening versus those with negative screening. Among 32 052 patients included, 50.5% screened positive for opioids at the time of presentation. These patients were more likely to be female (p < .0001), more likely to possess scald injuries (p < .0001), and less likely to be experiencing homelessness (p < .0001) or to be diagnosed with inhalation injury (p < .005). Opioid positivity was associated with increased odds of infectious complications, such as cellulitis (OR = 2.7, p < .0001) and sepsis (OR = 1.41, p < .001). Opioid negativity, conversely, had a higher prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (p < .0001), acute kidney injury (p < .0001), respiratory failure (p < .05), and cardiac arrest (p < .05). The opioid-negative population also necessitated more frequent admission to the critical care unit (p < .05) and demonstrated higher overall mortality (p < .0001). These findings highlight the vulnerability of opioid-negative patients who may have delayed presentation and more severe injuries than originally anticipated. This work underscores the need for heightened vigilance and equitable, early care for these patients to mitigate risk in this group.

阿片类药物筛查阳性烧伤患者的住院并发症和预后
阿片类药物使用障碍使烧伤的管理复杂化,特别是在实现适当的疼痛控制方面。虽然先前的单机构研究已经评估了阿片类药物使用与烧伤结果之间的关系,但对住院并发症的多机构分析仍然有限。使用美国烧伤协会非商业性烧伤研究数据集,本研究比较了院前阿片类药物阳性筛查患者与阴性筛查患者的住院结果。在纳入的32 052例患者中,50.5%的患者在就诊时阿片类药物筛查呈阳性。这些患者更有可能是女性(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书