Behavioral and pharmacological validation of the differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior paradigm in non-human primates.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioural Pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.1097/FBP.0000000000000893
Casey R Vanderlip, Shelby R Dunn, Jennifer L Basile, Joseph G Wettstein, Jeffrey A Vivian, Courtney Glavis-Bloom
{"title":"Behavioral and pharmacological validation of the differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior paradigm in non-human primates.","authors":"Casey R Vanderlip, Shelby R Dunn, Jennifer L Basile, Joseph G Wettstein, Jeffrey A Vivian, Courtney Glavis-Bloom","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet the predictive validity of many preclinical behavioral assays for antidepressant efficacy remains limited. The differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior (DRL) task has classically been used in rodents to identify antidepressant-like effects, but its utility in non-human primates (NHPs) has not been established. Here, we adapted the DRL task for use in adult male cynomolgus macaques ( Macaca fascicularis ) and evaluated its pharmacological sensitivity and translational relevance across 19 compounds spanning multiple drug classes. Antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors, generally shifted DRL performance in an antidepressant-like direction, increasing reinforcers earned and inter-response times while decreasing response output. In contrast, benzodiazepine and antipsychotic control compounds did not produce a consistent antidepressant-like profile, whereas stimulant effects were mixed, with nicotine and cocaine also producing overlapping antidepressant-like behavioral effects. Importantly, the primate DRL task identified antidepressant-like effects of PDE4 inhibitors while also capturing emesis, a dose-limiting side effect not observable in rodent models. These findings support the primate DRL task as a translationally relevant platform for screening antidepressant-like efficacy, while also highlighting important design considerations for interpreting pharmacological sensitivity in the NHP setting. By modeling behavioral processes implicated in depression, including response inhibition and temporal regulation, this assay offers a unique opportunity to bridge preclinical and clinical antidepressant development with improved sensitivity to both efficacy and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"221-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet the predictive validity of many preclinical behavioral assays for antidepressant efficacy remains limited. The differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior (DRL) task has classically been used in rodents to identify antidepressant-like effects, but its utility in non-human primates (NHPs) has not been established. Here, we adapted the DRL task for use in adult male cynomolgus macaques ( Macaca fascicularis ) and evaluated its pharmacological sensitivity and translational relevance across 19 compounds spanning multiple drug classes. Antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors, generally shifted DRL performance in an antidepressant-like direction, increasing reinforcers earned and inter-response times while decreasing response output. In contrast, benzodiazepine and antipsychotic control compounds did not produce a consistent antidepressant-like profile, whereas stimulant effects were mixed, with nicotine and cocaine also producing overlapping antidepressant-like behavioral effects. Importantly, the primate DRL task identified antidepressant-like effects of PDE4 inhibitors while also capturing emesis, a dose-limiting side effect not observable in rodent models. These findings support the primate DRL task as a translationally relevant platform for screening antidepressant-like efficacy, while also highlighting important design considerations for interpreting pharmacological sensitivity in the NHP setting. By modeling behavioral processes implicated in depression, including response inhibition and temporal regulation, this assay offers a unique opportunity to bridge preclinical and clinical antidepressant development with improved sensitivity to both efficacy and tolerability.

非人类灵长类动物低速率行为模式差异强化的行为学和药理学验证。
抑郁症仍然是世界范围内致残的主要原因,然而许多临床前行为分析对抗抑郁药物疗效的预测有效性仍然有限。低率行为(DRL)任务的差异强化通常被用于啮齿类动物,以确定抗抑郁样效应,但其在非人类灵长类动物(NHPs)中的应用尚未建立。在这里,我们将DRL任务应用于成年雄性食蟹猕猴(Macaca fascicularis),并评估了其在19种化合物(跨越多个药物类别)中的药理学敏感性和翻译相关性。抗抑郁药,包括选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂、去甲肾上腺素-多巴胺再摄取抑制剂、三环抗抑郁药、单胺氧化酶抑制剂和磷酸二酯酶-4 (PDE4)抑制剂,通常会使DRL的表现向抗抑郁方向转变,增加获得的强化物和反应间时间,同时减少反应输出。相比之下,苯二氮卓类药物和抗精神病控制化合物并没有产生一致的抗抑郁样的特征,而兴奋剂的作用是混合的,尼古丁和可卡因也产生重叠的抗抑郁样的行为效果。重要的是,灵长类动物DRL任务确定了PDE4抑制剂的抗抑郁样作用,同时也捕获了呕吐,这是一种在啮齿动物模型中未观察到的剂量限制副作用。这些发现支持灵长类DRL任务作为筛选抗抑郁药物样疗效的翻译相关平台,同时也强调了在NHP环境下解释药物敏感性的重要设计考虑。通过模拟与抑郁症相关的行为过程,包括反应抑制和时间调节,该分析为临床前和临床抗抑郁药物的开发提供了一个独特的机会,提高了对疗效和耐受性的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Pharmacology
Behavioural Pharmacology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书