Casey R Vanderlip, Shelby R Dunn, Jennifer L Basile, Joseph G Wettstein, Jeffrey A Vivian, Courtney Glavis-Bloom
{"title":"Behavioral and pharmacological validation of the differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior paradigm in non-human primates.","authors":"Casey R Vanderlip, Shelby R Dunn, Jennifer L Basile, Joseph G Wettstein, Jeffrey A Vivian, Courtney Glavis-Bloom","doi":"10.1097/FBP.0000000000000893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet the predictive validity of many preclinical behavioral assays for antidepressant efficacy remains limited. The differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior (DRL) task has classically been used in rodents to identify antidepressant-like effects, but its utility in non-human primates (NHPs) has not been established. Here, we adapted the DRL task for use in adult male cynomolgus macaques ( Macaca fascicularis ) and evaluated its pharmacological sensitivity and translational relevance across 19 compounds spanning multiple drug classes. Antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors, generally shifted DRL performance in an antidepressant-like direction, increasing reinforcers earned and inter-response times while decreasing response output. In contrast, benzodiazepine and antipsychotic control compounds did not produce a consistent antidepressant-like profile, whereas stimulant effects were mixed, with nicotine and cocaine also producing overlapping antidepressant-like behavioral effects. Importantly, the primate DRL task identified antidepressant-like effects of PDE4 inhibitors while also capturing emesis, a dose-limiting side effect not observable in rodent models. These findings support the primate DRL task as a translationally relevant platform for screening antidepressant-like efficacy, while also highlighting important design considerations for interpreting pharmacological sensitivity in the NHP setting. By modeling behavioral processes implicated in depression, including response inhibition and temporal regulation, this assay offers a unique opportunity to bridge preclinical and clinical antidepressant development with improved sensitivity to both efficacy and tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8832,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"221-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Depression remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet the predictive validity of many preclinical behavioral assays for antidepressant efficacy remains limited. The differential reinforcement of low-rate behavior (DRL) task has classically been used in rodents to identify antidepressant-like effects, but its utility in non-human primates (NHPs) has not been established. Here, we adapted the DRL task for use in adult male cynomolgus macaques ( Macaca fascicularis ) and evaluated its pharmacological sensitivity and translational relevance across 19 compounds spanning multiple drug classes. Antidepressants, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors, generally shifted DRL performance in an antidepressant-like direction, increasing reinforcers earned and inter-response times while decreasing response output. In contrast, benzodiazepine and antipsychotic control compounds did not produce a consistent antidepressant-like profile, whereas stimulant effects were mixed, with nicotine and cocaine also producing overlapping antidepressant-like behavioral effects. Importantly, the primate DRL task identified antidepressant-like effects of PDE4 inhibitors while also capturing emesis, a dose-limiting side effect not observable in rodent models. These findings support the primate DRL task as a translationally relevant platform for screening antidepressant-like efficacy, while also highlighting important design considerations for interpreting pharmacological sensitivity in the NHP setting. By modeling behavioral processes implicated in depression, including response inhibition and temporal regulation, this assay offers a unique opportunity to bridge preclinical and clinical antidepressant development with improved sensitivity to both efficacy and tolerability.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Pharmacology accepts original full and short research reports in diverse areas ranging from ethopharmacology to the pharmacology of schedule-controlled operant behaviour, provided that their primary focus is behavioural. Suitable topics include drug, chemical and hormonal effects on behaviour, the neurochemical mechanisms under-lying behaviour, and behavioural methods for the study of drug action. Both animal and human studies are welcome; however, studies reporting neurochemical data should have a predominantly behavioural focus, and human studies should not consist exclusively of clinical trials or case reports. Preference is given to studies that demonstrate and develop the potential of behavioural methods, and to papers reporting findings of direct relevance to clinical problems. Papers making a significant theoretical contribution are particularly welcome and, where possible and merited, space is made available for authors to explore fully the theoretical implications of their findings. Reviews of an area of the literature or at an appropriate stage in the development of an author’s own work are welcome. Commentaries in areas of current interest are also considered for publication, as are Reviews and Commentaries in areas outside behavioural pharmacology, but of importance and interest to behavioural pharmacologists. Behavioural Pharmacology publishes frequent Special Issues on current hot topics. The editors welcome correspondence about whether a paper in preparation might be suitable for inclusion in a Special Issue.