Residual emissions may perpetuate community-scale inequalities in US air pollution

IF 26.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Candelaria Bergero, Jing Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Yang Ou, Haewon McJeon, Morgan R. Edwards, Destenie Nock, Inês Azevedo, Steven J. Davis
{"title":"Residual emissions may perpetuate community-scale inequalities in US air pollution","authors":"Candelaria Bergero, Jing Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Yang Ou, Haewon McJeon, Morgan R. Edwards, Destenie Nock, Inês Azevedo, Steven J. Davis","doi":"10.1038/s41558-026-02675-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving net-zero targets reduces greenhouse gas emissions and their co-pollutants, thereby improving air quality; however, the magnitude and distribution of these improvements depend on the amount and location of residual emissions offset by carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Here we integrate a series of models and datasets to analyse community-scale particulate matter (PM2.5) impacts of different net-zero scenarios across the contiguous USA. These scenarios avoid many PM2.5-related deaths compared with a reference case, decreasing from around 200,000 to 160,000 and 130,000 deaths in 2050 in the high- and low-CDR scenarios, respectively. However, the low-CDR pathway leads to lower residual emissions and brings greater health improvements that disproportionately benefit non-white and low-income groups. Our results thus suggest that, in the absence of deliberate transition planning, large-scale CDR deployment could be at odds with the equitable distribution of climate mitigation-related health benefits in the USA. The scale of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) could determine the extent of co-emitted air pollutants in net-zero scenarios and potential health impacts. By linking a series of models and datasets, researchers find that low-CDR pathways lead to a more equitable distribution of health benefits across the USA.","PeriodicalId":18974,"journal":{"name":"Nature Climate Change","volume":"16 8","pages":"922-930"},"PeriodicalIF":26.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02675-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-026-02675-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving net-zero targets reduces greenhouse gas emissions and their co-pollutants, thereby improving air quality; however, the magnitude and distribution of these improvements depend on the amount and location of residual emissions offset by carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Here we integrate a series of models and datasets to analyse community-scale particulate matter (PM2.5) impacts of different net-zero scenarios across the contiguous USA. These scenarios avoid many PM2.5-related deaths compared with a reference case, decreasing from around 200,000 to 160,000 and 130,000 deaths in 2050 in the high- and low-CDR scenarios, respectively. However, the low-CDR pathway leads to lower residual emissions and brings greater health improvements that disproportionately benefit non-white and low-income groups. Our results thus suggest that, in the absence of deliberate transition planning, large-scale CDR deployment could be at odds with the equitable distribution of climate mitigation-related health benefits in the USA. The scale of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) could determine the extent of co-emitted air pollutants in net-zero scenarios and potential health impacts. By linking a series of models and datasets, researchers find that low-CDR pathways lead to a more equitable distribution of health benefits across the USA.
残留排放可能使美国空气污染的社区规模不平等永久化
实现净零排放目标可减少温室气体及其共污染物的排放,从而改善空气质量;然而,这些改善的幅度和分布取决于二氧化碳去除(CDR)抵消的残余排放的数量和位置。在这里,我们整合了一系列模型和数据集,分析了美国不同净零情景下社区尺度颗粒物(PM2.5)的影响。与参考病例相比,这些情景避免了许多与pm2.5相关的死亡,在高和低cdr情景中,2050年的死亡人数分别从约20万减少到16万和13万。然而,低cdr路径导致更低的残留排放,并带来更大的健康改善,这对非白人和低收入群体不成比例地有利。因此,我们的研究结果表明,在缺乏深思熟虑的过渡规划的情况下,大规模部署CDR可能与美国气候减缓相关健康效益的公平分配不一致。二氧化碳去除(CDR)的规模可以决定净零情景下共同排放空气污染物的程度和潜在的健康影响。通过将一系列模型和数据集联系起来,研究人员发现,低cdr途径可以在美国范围内更公平地分配健康福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Climate Change
Nature Climate Change ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
40.30
自引率
1.60%
发文量
267
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Climate Change is dedicated to addressing the scientific challenge of understanding Earth's changing climate and its societal implications. As a monthly journal, it publishes significant and cutting-edge research on the nature, causes, and impacts of global climate change, as well as its implications for the economy, policy, and the world at large. The journal publishes original research spanning the natural and social sciences, synthesizing interdisciplinary research to provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change. It upholds the high standards set by all Nature-branded journals, ensuring top-tier original research through a fair and rigorous review process, broad readership access, high standards of copy editing and production, rapid publication, and independence from academic societies and other vested interests. Nature Climate Change serves as a platform for discussion among experts, publishing opinion, analysis, and review articles. It also features Research Highlights to highlight important developments in the field and original reporting from renowned science journalists in the form of feature articles. Topics covered in the journal include adaptation, atmospheric science, ecology, economics, energy, impacts and vulnerability, mitigation, oceanography, policy, sociology, and sustainability, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书