Prevalence, risk factor, control and dwelling of Ascaridia galli in the gut of chickens.

N Khan, W Khan, W Ali, M Shoaib, Anisuzzaman, R Abebe, B S Chaves, V S Vasconcelos, R L R Paludo, Ramos D G S
{"title":"Prevalence, risk factor, control and dwelling of Ascaridia galli in the gut of chickens.","authors":"N Khan, W Khan, W Ali, M Shoaib, Anisuzzaman, R Abebe, B S Chaves, V S Vasconcelos, R L R Paludo, Ramos D G S","doi":"10.47665/tb.43.2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ascaridia galli infection compromises the health and productivity of chickens. this study aimed to determine the prevalence, pathology, and control of A. galli in backyard chickens. Four hundred and fifty-six faecal samples were tested using direct smear and concentration techniques. sixty chickens were grouped based on egg per gram into untreated control, mebendazole-treated, and derivative-treated. Key epidemiologic host based and environmental variables were recorded and analysed statistically (p < 0.05 significance level). Histopathological changes in the intestine were also assessed. Overall prevalence of A. galli was 72% (330/456). Infection was high in females (74%, 200/267) than in males (68%, 130/189). Adult chickens had a higher infection rate than young (64% vs 55%; p < 0.05). Weak chickens showed a markedly higher prevalence (96%, 150/156) than healthy chickens (60%, 180/300) (p < 0.05). Geographically, prevalence was highest in Swat (85.53%), followed by Lower Dir (72.3%) and Malakand (59.21%), with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Management system influenced infection: free range chickens had (63%) compared to semi-free range (37%), scavenging chickens were more infected (75%) compared to receiving supplemental feed (53%) (p < 0.05). The non-dewormed chickens had a significantly higher prevalence (92%) than the dewormed group (20%) (p < 0.05). Seasonal infection peaked during the rainy season (86%) compared to the dry season (44%) (p < 0.05). Intestinal histology revealed inflammation, epithelial necrosis, villous atrophy, and crypt hyperplasia. Treatment of the chickens nematodes using mebendazole resulted in 70% (14/20) of the treated eggs being egg-negative, and the comparison of treatment of the egg-negative derivative compound resulted in 80% (16/20) of the treated eggs being egg-negative. The A. galli infection are very common, and cause intestine damage. The mebendazole and its derivative decrease egg shedding significantly, Husbandry, management and treatment should be enhanced for effective control strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":101343,"journal":{"name":"Tropical biomedicine","volume":"43 2","pages":"151-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47665/tb.43.2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ascaridia galli infection compromises the health and productivity of chickens. this study aimed to determine the prevalence, pathology, and control of A. galli in backyard chickens. Four hundred and fifty-six faecal samples were tested using direct smear and concentration techniques. sixty chickens were grouped based on egg per gram into untreated control, mebendazole-treated, and derivative-treated. Key epidemiologic host based and environmental variables were recorded and analysed statistically (p < 0.05 significance level). Histopathological changes in the intestine were also assessed. Overall prevalence of A. galli was 72% (330/456). Infection was high in females (74%, 200/267) than in males (68%, 130/189). Adult chickens had a higher infection rate than young (64% vs 55%; p < 0.05). Weak chickens showed a markedly higher prevalence (96%, 150/156) than healthy chickens (60%, 180/300) (p < 0.05). Geographically, prevalence was highest in Swat (85.53%), followed by Lower Dir (72.3%) and Malakand (59.21%), with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Management system influenced infection: free range chickens had (63%) compared to semi-free range (37%), scavenging chickens were more infected (75%) compared to receiving supplemental feed (53%) (p < 0.05). The non-dewormed chickens had a significantly higher prevalence (92%) than the dewormed group (20%) (p < 0.05). Seasonal infection peaked during the rainy season (86%) compared to the dry season (44%) (p < 0.05). Intestinal histology revealed inflammation, epithelial necrosis, villous atrophy, and crypt hyperplasia. Treatment of the chickens nematodes using mebendazole resulted in 70% (14/20) of the treated eggs being egg-negative, and the comparison of treatment of the egg-negative derivative compound resulted in 80% (16/20) of the treated eggs being egg-negative. The A. galli infection are very common, and cause intestine damage. The mebendazole and its derivative decrease egg shedding significantly, Husbandry, management and treatment should be enhanced for effective control strategies.

鸡肠道中鸡形蛔虫的流行、危险因素、控制及栖息。
鸡蛔虫感染危害鸡的健康和生产能力。本研究旨在了解鸡群中甲状芽孢杆菌的流行、病理及防治情况。采用直接涂片和浓缩技术对456份粪便样本进行了检测。按每克产蛋数将60只鸡分为对照组、甲苯达唑组和衍生物组。记录主要流行病学宿主和环境变量并进行统计学分析(p < 0.05显著水平)。还评估了肠道的组织病理学变化。总患病率为72%(330/456)。女性感染率(74%,200/267)高于男性(68%,130/189)。成鸡感染率高于雏鸡(64% vs 55%, p < 0.05)。病鸡患病率(96%,150/156)显著高于健康鸡(60%,180/300)(p < 0.05)。从地域上看,斯瓦特地区患病率最高(85.53%),其次是下迪尔(72.3%)和马拉坎德(59.21%),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。管理制度对感染有影响:散养鸡(63%)比半散养鸡(37%)感染,食腐鸡(75%)比添加饲料(53%)感染(p < 0.05)。未驱虫组的患病率(92%)显著高于驱虫组(20%)(p < 0.05)。季节性感染以雨季最高(86%),旱季最高(44%)(p < 0.05)。肠道组织学显示炎症、上皮坏死、绒毛萎缩和隐窝增生。用甲苯达唑处理鸡线虫后,70%(14/20)的处理蛋呈阴性,用甲苯达唑衍生物处理鸡线虫后,80%(16/20)的处理蛋呈阴性。大肠杆菌感染很常见,会导致肠道损伤。甲苯达唑及其衍生物能显著降低蛋鸡的脱落,应加强饲养、管理和处理,制定有效的防治策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书