A phase III, randomized, double blind, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of intramuscular diclofenac 75 mg + thiocolchicoside 4 mg, compared to diclofenac 75 mg monotherapy and placebo, in the treatment of acute low back pain.

Cosimo Costantino, Theodoros Kormas, Avraam Ploumis, Panagiotis Karampinas, Attilio Giossi, Emilio Albamonte, Chiara Busso, Ioannis Chatzikomninos, Umile G Longo, Georgios Stranjalis, Mattia Fortina, Maurizio Mancuso, Antonio Ammendolia, Panagiotis Megas, Biagio Trupa, Pierluigi Navarra
{"title":"A phase III, randomized, double blind, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of intramuscular diclofenac 75 mg + thiocolchicoside 4 mg, compared to diclofenac 75 mg monotherapy and placebo, in the treatment of acute low back pain.","authors":"Cosimo Costantino, Theodoros Kormas, Avraam Ploumis, Panagiotis Karampinas, Attilio Giossi, Emilio Albamonte, Chiara Busso, Ioannis Chatzikomninos, Umile G Longo, Georgios Stranjalis, Mattia Fortina, Maurizio Mancuso, Antonio Ammendolia, Panagiotis Megas, Biagio Trupa, Pierluigi Navarra","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4806.26.09906-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to demonstrate the superiority of diclofenac sodium 75 mg/thiocolchicoside 4 mg/4 mL fixed-dose combination (FDC) for intramuscular (IM) injection vs. diclofenac 75 mg alone or placebo in relieving pain in patients suffering from low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with acute moderate-severe LBP, i.e., with ≥50 mm at Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) assessment and stable muscle contracture, were randomized to receive diclofenac/thiocolchicoside FDC (N.=68), diclofenac monotherapy (N.=68) or placebo (N.=69), all given IM once-daily in two consecutive days. The primary endpoint was the sum of pain intensity difference from pre-dose to Day 3 in VAS for pain - SPID(0-3). Pain was also measured twice daily up to Day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean SPID(0-3) was significantly higher with test FDC (116.2 mm) versus diclofenac (94.8 mm) and placebo (62.6 mm). The superiority of FDC over control groups was maintained up to Day 7 - SPID(0-7). Muscle contracture (expressed as Schober's index) decreased more markedly in the test group compared to controls. The results of the 24-item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire confirmed the superiority of FDC over diclofenac and placebo on physical functions. Rescue treatment (oral diclofenac) was used in fewer patients in the FDC group than in control groups. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in fewer patients in the FDC and diclofenac groups (5.9%) compared to the placebo group (16.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IM diclofenac + thiocolchicoside FDC was significantly more effective than diclofenac and placebo in the relief of pain and improvement of mobility in patients with acute moderate-severe LBP, and was well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":94143,"journal":{"name":"Minerva medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4806.26.09906-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to demonstrate the superiority of diclofenac sodium 75 mg/thiocolchicoside 4 mg/4 mL fixed-dose combination (FDC) for intramuscular (IM) injection vs. diclofenac 75 mg alone or placebo in relieving pain in patients suffering from low back pain (LBP).

Methods: Adult patients with acute moderate-severe LBP, i.e., with ≥50 mm at Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) assessment and stable muscle contracture, were randomized to receive diclofenac/thiocolchicoside FDC (N.=68), diclofenac monotherapy (N.=68) or placebo (N.=69), all given IM once-daily in two consecutive days. The primary endpoint was the sum of pain intensity difference from pre-dose to Day 3 in VAS for pain - SPID(0-3). Pain was also measured twice daily up to Day 7.

Results: Mean SPID(0-3) was significantly higher with test FDC (116.2 mm) versus diclofenac (94.8 mm) and placebo (62.6 mm). The superiority of FDC over control groups was maintained up to Day 7 - SPID(0-7). Muscle contracture (expressed as Schober's index) decreased more markedly in the test group compared to controls. The results of the 24-item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire confirmed the superiority of FDC over diclofenac and placebo on physical functions. Rescue treatment (oral diclofenac) was used in fewer patients in the FDC group than in control groups. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in fewer patients in the FDC and diclofenac groups (5.9%) compared to the placebo group (16.2%).

Conclusions: IM diclofenac + thiocolchicoside FDC was significantly more effective than diclofenac and placebo in the relief of pain and improvement of mobility in patients with acute moderate-severe LBP, and was well tolerated.

一项III期、随机、双盲、对照试验,旨在评估双氯芬酸75 mg肌注+硫代果绿糖苷4 mg固定联合治疗急性腰痛的疗效和安全性,与双氯芬酸75 mg单药治疗和安慰剂治疗相比。
背景:本研究旨在证明双氯芬酸钠75mg /硫代枸橼酸苷4mg / 4ml固定剂量联合(FDC)肌内注射在缓解腰痛(LBP)患者疼痛方面优于单用双氯芬酸75mg或安慰剂。方法:急性中重度腰痛的成年患者,即视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估≥50 mm且肌肉挛缩稳定的患者,随机分为双氯芬酸/硫代红葡萄糖苷FDC组(n =68)、双氯芬酸单药组(n =68)或安慰剂组(n =69),均给予IM,每日1次,连续2天。主要终点是从给药前到第3天VAS疼痛强度差的总和- SPID(0-3)。疼痛也每天测量两次,直到第7天。结果:与双氯芬酸(94.8 mm)和安慰剂(62.6 mm)相比,平均SPID(0-3)显著高于试验FDC (116.2 mm)。FDC优于对照组的优势一直保持到第7天- SPID(0-7)。与对照组相比,实验组的肌肉挛缩(以Schober指数表示)明显减少。24项Roland-Morris残疾问卷的结果证实了FDC在身体功能方面优于双氯芬酸和安慰剂。与对照组相比,FDC组较少患者使用抢救治疗(口服双氯芬酸)。与安慰剂组(16.2%)相比,FDC组和双氯芬酸组报告的治疗相关不良事件较少(5.9%)。结论:IM双氯芬酸+硫代葡萄糖苷FDC在缓解急性中重度LBP患者疼痛和改善活动能力方面明显优于双氯芬酸和安慰剂,且耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书