External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Prediction of Upper-Limb Recovery After Stroke.

IF 3.7
G J van der Gun, R W Selles, I C Brunner, C Biering Lundquist
{"title":"External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Prediction of Upper-Limb Recovery After Stroke.","authors":"G J van der Gun, R W Selles, I C Brunner, C Biering Lundquist","doi":"10.1177/15459683261469091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reliable prediction of upper-limb recovery after stroke can support rehabilitation planning, yet few prognostic models have been tested beyond their development cohorts. External validation is essential to establish the clinical reliability of these methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To externally validate a previously developed machine learning model for predicting 6-month upper-limb capacity after stroke, measured by the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model was developed on a multicentre Dutch cohort of first-ever ischaemic stroke patients and validated in an independent Danish prospective cohort, including both ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes. Predictions were generated from baseline assessments at 2 weeks post-stroke. Model performance was evaluated using the median absolute error (MedAE) and calibration analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The validation cohort comprised 80 patients assessed at 14 ± 4 days post-stroke. Overall prediction error was comparable between the validation and development cohorts (MedAE = 5.7 [IQR 1.9-15.1] vs 3.9 [IQR 1.1-13.0]; P = 0.12). Calibration was close to ideal for predicted ARAT scores above 40. In contrast, lower predicted ranges showed systematic underprediction, reflecting variable outcomes in severely impaired patients, a pattern similar to that observed in the development cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an independent validation cohort, the machine learning model performed similarly to its development cohort but showed clinically relevant miscalibration in patients with low predicted ARAT scores. Inclusion of additional predictors is required to improve reliability in severely impaired patients before subsequent steps toward clinical implementation can be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"15459683261469091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683261469091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reliable prediction of upper-limb recovery after stroke can support rehabilitation planning, yet few prognostic models have been tested beyond their development cohorts. External validation is essential to establish the clinical reliability of these methods.

Objective: To externally validate a previously developed machine learning model for predicting 6-month upper-limb capacity after stroke, measured by the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT).

Methods: The model was developed on a multicentre Dutch cohort of first-ever ischaemic stroke patients and validated in an independent Danish prospective cohort, including both ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes. Predictions were generated from baseline assessments at 2 weeks post-stroke. Model performance was evaluated using the median absolute error (MedAE) and calibration analysis.

Results: The validation cohort comprised 80 patients assessed at 14 ± 4 days post-stroke. Overall prediction error was comparable between the validation and development cohorts (MedAE = 5.7 [IQR 1.9-15.1] vs 3.9 [IQR 1.1-13.0]; P = 0.12). Calibration was close to ideal for predicted ARAT scores above 40. In contrast, lower predicted ranges showed systematic underprediction, reflecting variable outcomes in severely impaired patients, a pattern similar to that observed in the development cohort.

Conclusions: In an independent validation cohort, the machine learning model performed similarly to its development cohort but showed clinically relevant miscalibration in patients with low predicted ARAT scores. Inclusion of additional predictors is required to improve reliability in severely impaired patients before subsequent steps toward clinical implementation can be considered.

脑卒中后上肢恢复早期预测的机器学习模型的外部验证。
背景:中风后上肢恢复的可靠预测可以支持康复计划,但很少有预后模型在其发展队列之外进行测试。外部验证对于建立这些方法的临床可靠性至关重要。目的:外部验证先前开发的机器学习模型,用于预测中风后6个月的上肢能力,该模型由动作研究臂测试(ARAT)测量。方法:该模型在首次缺血性卒中患者的多中心荷兰队列中开发,并在独立的丹麦前瞻性队列中验证,包括缺血性和出血性卒中。预测来自中风后2周的基线评估。使用中位数绝对误差(MedAE)和校准分析评估模型性能。结果:验证队列包括80例卒中后14±4天评估的患者。验证组和开发组的总体预测误差具有可比性(MedAE = 5.7 [IQR 1.9-15.1] vs 3.9 [IQR 1.1-13.0]; P = 0.12)。对于预测的ARAT分数高于40分,校准接近理想。相比之下,较低的预测范围显示出系统性的预测不足,反映了严重受损患者的可变结果,这与在发展队列中观察到的模式相似。结论:在独立验证队列中,机器学习模型的表现与其开发队列相似,但在预测ARAT评分较低的患者中出现临床相关的误校准。在考虑临床实施的后续步骤之前,需要纳入额外的预测因子来提高严重受损患者的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书