A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake and Adherence of Injectable PrEP Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Sub-Saharan Africa.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Noah Mancuso, Stacy Endres-Dighe, Definate Nhamo, Miranda Diaz, Alinda M Nyamaizi, Nomvuyo Thelma Mangxilana, Elizabeth T Montgomery, Sue Napierala, Sybil Hosek, Nyaradzo M Mgodi, Millicent Atujuna, Sarah T Roberts
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators to the Uptake and Adherence of Injectable PrEP Among Adolescent Girls and Young Women in Sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Noah Mancuso, Stacy Endres-Dighe, Definate Nhamo, Miranda Diaz, Alinda M Nyamaizi, Nomvuyo Thelma Mangxilana, Elizabeth T Montgomery, Sue Napierala, Sybil Hosek, Nyaradzo M Mgodi, Millicent Atujuna, Sarah T Roberts","doi":"10.1007/s10461-026-05201-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa bear a disproportionate burden of HIV. Long-acting injectable PrEP (LAI-PrEP) may address adherence challenges associated with daily oral PrEP, but social and structural barriers threaten real-world implementation. Drawing on parallels with injectable contraception and multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs), this systematic review synthesizes evidence on barriers and facilitators to LAI-PrEP use among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed studies published January 2015 to February 2025 were identified across four databases. Studies were included if they examined barriers or facilitators to uptake or adherence of injectable PrEP, contraception, or MPTs among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Data were abstracted using a socioecological model adapted for PrEP implementation. Of 1,716 screened references, 53 met inclusion criteria, spanning 37 countries. Most studies focused on injectable contraception; only nine examined injectable PrEP, eight of which assessed hypothetical use. Cross-cutting barriers included fear of side effects, misinformation, stigma, and logistical and cognitive challenges related to return visits. Cross-cutting facilitators included familiarity with injectables, social support, and perceived privacy. Partner and provider power dynamics, restrictive sociocultural norms, provider gatekeeping, and health system limitations further shaped injectable use. Despite biomedical advantages, LAI-PrEP uptake among AGYW may face entrenched barriers similar to other PrEP modalities. Although AGYW's familiarity with injectable contraception may enhance LAI-PrEP acceptability, systemic and interpersonal challenges remain under-addressed. Effective LAI-PrEP implementation in the real-world will require integrating lessons from contraceptive programs, improving provider training, expanding delivery channels, and centering AGYW in decision-making to support equitable scale-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-026-05201-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in sub-Saharan Africa bear a disproportionate burden of HIV. Long-acting injectable PrEP (LAI-PrEP) may address adherence challenges associated with daily oral PrEP, but social and structural barriers threaten real-world implementation. Drawing on parallels with injectable contraception and multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs), this systematic review synthesizes evidence on barriers and facilitators to LAI-PrEP use among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed studies published January 2015 to February 2025 were identified across four databases. Studies were included if they examined barriers or facilitators to uptake or adherence of injectable PrEP, contraception, or MPTs among AGYW in sub-Saharan Africa. Data were abstracted using a socioecological model adapted for PrEP implementation. Of 1,716 screened references, 53 met inclusion criteria, spanning 37 countries. Most studies focused on injectable contraception; only nine examined injectable PrEP, eight of which assessed hypothetical use. Cross-cutting barriers included fear of side effects, misinformation, stigma, and logistical and cognitive challenges related to return visits. Cross-cutting facilitators included familiarity with injectables, social support, and perceived privacy. Partner and provider power dynamics, restrictive sociocultural norms, provider gatekeeping, and health system limitations further shaped injectable use. Despite biomedical advantages, LAI-PrEP uptake among AGYW may face entrenched barriers similar to other PrEP modalities. Although AGYW's familiarity with injectable contraception may enhance LAI-PrEP acceptability, systemic and interpersonal challenges remain under-addressed. Effective LAI-PrEP implementation in the real-world will require integrating lessons from contraceptive programs, improving provider training, expanding delivery channels, and centering AGYW in decision-making to support equitable scale-up.

对撒哈拉以南非洲少女和年轻妇女接受和坚持注射PrEP的障碍和促进因素的系统审查。
撒哈拉以南非洲的少女和年轻妇女承受着不成比例的艾滋病毒负担。长效注射PrEP (LAI-PrEP)可以解决与日常口服PrEP相关的依从性挑战,但社会和结构障碍威胁着现实世界的实施。根据与注射避孕和多用途预防技术(MPTs)的相似之处,本系统综述综合了撒哈拉以南非洲地区AGYW使用低剂量避孕针预防措施的障碍和促进因素的证据。根据PRISMA的指导方针,在四个数据库中确定了2015年1月至2025年2月发表的同行评议研究。如果研究调查了撒哈拉以南非洲地区AGYW接受或坚持注射PrEP、避孕或mpt的障碍或促进因素,则纳入研究。使用适合PrEP实施的社会生态模型对数据进行抽象。在筛选的1716份参考文献中,有53份符合纳入标准,涉及37个国家。大多数研究集中在注射避孕;只有9项检查了可注射PrEP,其中8项评估了假设使用。交叉障碍包括对副作用的恐惧、错误信息、耻辱以及与回访相关的后勤和认知挑战。交叉促进因素包括对注射的熟悉程度、社会支持和感知隐私。合作伙伴和提供者权力动态、限制性社会文化规范、提供者把关和卫生系统限制进一步影响了注射使用。尽管具有生物医学上的优势,但在AGYW中使用LAI-PrEP可能面临与其他PrEP方式类似的根深蒂固的障碍。虽然AGYW对注射避孕的熟悉可能会提高lei - prep的可接受性,但系统和人际挑战仍未得到解决。在现实世界中有效实施lei - prep将需要整合避孕规划的经验教训,改进提供者培训,扩大提供渠道,并将AGYW纳入决策中心,以支持公平推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书