Alignment Between Assessment Processes and Active Methodologies in Primary Education

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Silvia Conde-Izquierdo, David Pascual Nicolás, Álvaro Moraleda Ruano
{"title":"Alignment Between Assessment Processes and Active Methodologies in Primary Education","authors":"Silvia Conde-Izquierdo,&nbsp;David Pascual Nicolás,&nbsp;Álvaro Moraleda Ruano","doi":"10.1016/j.ijer.2026.103078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Active Methodologies and formative assessment are two fundamental components of contemporary competency-based educational approaches. Although both have been widely studied independently, limited evidence is available regarding how they are articulated in teaching practice and which factors facilitate or hinder coherence between active methodologies, assessment, and grading in primary education. This study examined such coherence from teachers’ perspectives, as well as the influence of training-related, professional, institutional, and disciplinary factors. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. The quantitative phase involved 500 Spanish primary school teachers and included descriptive, correlational, and inferential analyses using the OCDUMA and MAEV-G instruments. Subsequently, the qualitative phase analysed open-ended responses through Grounded Theory procedures to gain a deeper understanding of the quantitative findings. The results revealed positive associations between favourable perceptions of active methodologies and assessment and grading practices. Specific training in active methodologies emerged as one of the factors most closely associated with greater methodological and assessment coherence. Differences were also observed according to professional experience, school ownership, and teaching area. Qualitative findings indicated positive perceptions of self-assessment, peer assessment, and continuous feedback, alongside barriers related to administrative workload, time constraints, and training needs. The findings suggest that coherence between active methodologies, assessment, and grading is not an automatic consequence of pedagogical innovation but rather a process shaped by training-related, professional, and institutional factors. The study provides empirical evidence on the conditions that promote such coherence and highlights the importance of strengthening assessment literacy and the organisational conditions required for the sustainable implementation of competency-based approaches in primary education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Research","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 103078"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035526001497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active Methodologies and formative assessment are two fundamental components of contemporary competency-based educational approaches. Although both have been widely studied independently, limited evidence is available regarding how they are articulated in teaching practice and which factors facilitate or hinder coherence between active methodologies, assessment, and grading in primary education. This study examined such coherence from teachers’ perspectives, as well as the influence of training-related, professional, institutional, and disciplinary factors. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. The quantitative phase involved 500 Spanish primary school teachers and included descriptive, correlational, and inferential analyses using the OCDUMA and MAEV-G instruments. Subsequently, the qualitative phase analysed open-ended responses through Grounded Theory procedures to gain a deeper understanding of the quantitative findings. The results revealed positive associations between favourable perceptions of active methodologies and assessment and grading practices. Specific training in active methodologies emerged as one of the factors most closely associated with greater methodological and assessment coherence. Differences were also observed according to professional experience, school ownership, and teaching area. Qualitative findings indicated positive perceptions of self-assessment, peer assessment, and continuous feedback, alongside barriers related to administrative workload, time constraints, and training needs. The findings suggest that coherence between active methodologies, assessment, and grading is not an automatic consequence of pedagogical innovation but rather a process shaped by training-related, professional, and institutional factors. The study provides empirical evidence on the conditions that promote such coherence and highlights the importance of strengthening assessment literacy and the organisational conditions required for the sustainable implementation of competency-based approaches in primary education.
小学教育评估过程与积极方法的一致性
主动方法和形成性评估是当代能力教育方法的两个基本组成部分。虽然这两者都被广泛地独立研究过,但关于如何在教学实践中表达它们,以及哪些因素促进或阻碍了小学教育中积极的方法、评估和评分之间的一致性,证据有限。本研究从教师的角度,以及培训相关因素、专业因素、制度因素和学科因素的影响来考察这种一致性。采用解释性顺序混合方法设计。定量阶段涉及500名西班牙小学教师,使用OCDUMA和MAEV-G工具进行描述性、相关性和推断性分析。随后,定性阶段通过扎根理论程序分析开放式回答,以更深入地了解定量结果。结果显示积极方法的正面看法与评估和分级做法之间存在积极联系。积极方法方面的具体培训已成为与提高方法和评价一致性最密切相关的因素之一。根据专业经验、学校所有权和教学区域,也观察到差异。定性调查结果表明,除了与行政工作量、时间限制和培训需求相关的障碍外,对自我评估、同行评估和持续反馈的看法也很积极。研究结果表明,主动方法、评估和评分之间的一致性不是教学创新的自动结果,而是由培训相关的、专业的和制度因素形成的过程。该研究提供了关于促进这种一致性的条件的经验证据,并强调了加强评估素养的重要性以及在小学教育中可持续实施基于能力的方法所需的组织条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Educational Research
International Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Educational Research publishes regular papers and special issues on specific topics of interest to international audiences of educational researchers. Examples of recent Special Issues published in the journal illustrate the breadth of topics that have be included in the journal: Students Perspectives on Learning Environments, Social, Motivational and Emotional Aspects of Learning Disabilities, Epistemological Beliefs and Domain, Analyzing Mathematics Classroom Cultures and Practices, and Music Education: A site for collaborative creativity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书