Hydrogen concentration enhancement in co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris microalgae and empty fruit bunches: RSM optimisation and fixed-bed reactor comparison

IF 7.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Mahmoud Elsafi, Yeek-Chia Ho, Beh Hoe Guan, Wai Hong Leong, Norhana Mohamed Rashid
{"title":"Hydrogen concentration enhancement in co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris microalgae and empty fruit bunches: RSM optimisation and fixed-bed reactor comparison","authors":"Mahmoud Elsafi,&nbsp;Yeek-Chia Ho,&nbsp;Beh Hoe Guan,&nbsp;Wai Hong Leong,&nbsp;Norhana Mohamed Rashid","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2026.109322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrogen-rich syngas production from biomass remains constrained by limited hydrogen concentration and insufficient understanding of how reactor configuration influences hydrogen concentration under optimised conditions. This study systematically investigates hydrogen concentration (vol%) from <em>Chlorella vulgaris</em> microalgae and microalgae-empty fruit bunch (MA-EFB) co-pyrolysis using two fixed-bed reactor configurations: a custom-designed horizontal fixed-bed reactor (custom reactor) and a conventional tube furnace. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimise temperature (400–700 °C), residence time (20–60 min), particle size (150–300 µm), and MA blending ratio (0.25–0.75 g/g). Feedstock characterisation confirmed strong physicochemical complementarity, supporting favourable thermochemical interactions during co-pyrolysis. For microalgae pyrolysis, validated hydrogen concentrations of 48.28 vol% in the custom-designed horizontal fixed-bed reactor (custom reactor) and 44.81 vol% in the tube furnace were achieved under optimised conditions, with temperature identified as the dominant factor influencing hydrogen concentration. Co-pyrolysis further enhanced hydrogen concentration, achieving peak values of 58.94 vol% (custom reactor) and 56.48 vol% (tube furnace) at ∼666 °C, 60 min, MA ≈ 0.75, and 150 µm particle size. Statistical analysis produced highly significant quadratic models (R² &gt; 0.996, CV &lt; 5%), confirming the presence of an optimal operating window. Differences in hydrogen concentration between the two reactor configurations suggest that reactor configuration may influence hydrogen concentration, with the custom reactor consistently achieving approximately 2–3 vol% higher hydrogen concentration than the tube furnace under comparable conditions. These findings highlight the potential of MA-EFB co-pyrolysis under atmospheric, non-catalytic, fixed-bed conditions for enhancing hydrogen concentration (vol%) within the product gas, while further investigation incorporating absolute hydrogen productivity measurements and full gas composition analysis is required to evaluate overall process efficiency and scalability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 109322"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582026009390","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrogen-rich syngas production from biomass remains constrained by limited hydrogen concentration and insufficient understanding of how reactor configuration influences hydrogen concentration under optimised conditions. This study systematically investigates hydrogen concentration (vol%) from Chlorella vulgaris microalgae and microalgae-empty fruit bunch (MA-EFB) co-pyrolysis using two fixed-bed reactor configurations: a custom-designed horizontal fixed-bed reactor (custom reactor) and a conventional tube furnace. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimise temperature (400–700 °C), residence time (20–60 min), particle size (150–300 µm), and MA blending ratio (0.25–0.75 g/g). Feedstock characterisation confirmed strong physicochemical complementarity, supporting favourable thermochemical interactions during co-pyrolysis. For microalgae pyrolysis, validated hydrogen concentrations of 48.28 vol% in the custom-designed horizontal fixed-bed reactor (custom reactor) and 44.81 vol% in the tube furnace were achieved under optimised conditions, with temperature identified as the dominant factor influencing hydrogen concentration. Co-pyrolysis further enhanced hydrogen concentration, achieving peak values of 58.94 vol% (custom reactor) and 56.48 vol% (tube furnace) at ∼666 °C, 60 min, MA ≈ 0.75, and 150 µm particle size. Statistical analysis produced highly significant quadratic models (R² > 0.996, CV < 5%), confirming the presence of an optimal operating window. Differences in hydrogen concentration between the two reactor configurations suggest that reactor configuration may influence hydrogen concentration, with the custom reactor consistently achieving approximately 2–3 vol% higher hydrogen concentration than the tube furnace under comparable conditions. These findings highlight the potential of MA-EFB co-pyrolysis under atmospheric, non-catalytic, fixed-bed conditions for enhancing hydrogen concentration (vol%) within the product gas, while further investigation incorporating absolute hydrogen productivity measurements and full gas composition analysis is required to evaluate overall process efficiency and scalability.
普通小球藻微藻与空果束共热解氢浓度增强:RSM优化与固定床反应器比较
从生物质中生产富氢合成气仍然受到有限的氢浓度和对优化条件下反应器配置如何影响氢浓度的理解不足的限制。本研究采用定制设计的卧式固定床反应器(custom reactor)和传统管式炉两种固定床反应器配置,系统地研究了小球藻微藻和微藻空果束(MA-EFB)共热解过程中的氢气浓度(vol%)。采用响应面法(RSM)优化温度(400-700°C)、停留时间(20-60 min)、粒径(150-300 µm)和MA掺合比(0.25-0.75 g/g)。原料表征证实了强的物理化学互补性,支持在共热解过程中有利的热化学相互作用。对于微藻热解,在优化条件下,定制设计的卧式固定床反应器(定制反应器)的验证氢气浓度为48.28 vol%,管式炉的验证氢气浓度为44.81 vol%,温度是影响氢气浓度的主要因素。共热解进一步提高了氢气浓度,在~ 666°C, 60 min, MA≈ 0.75和150 µm粒径下,峰值分别为58.94 vol%(定制反应器)和56.48 vol%(管式炉)。统计分析产生了高度显著的二次模型(R²> 0.996, CV < 5%),证实了最佳操作窗口的存在。两种反应器配置之间的氢气浓度差异表明,反应器配置可能会影响氢气浓度,在可比条件下,定制反应器的氢气浓度始终比管式炉高约2-3 vol%。这些发现强调了MA-EFB共热解在常压、非催化、固定床条件下提高产品气体中氢浓度(vol%)的潜力,同时需要进一步的研究,包括绝对氢生产率测量和全气体成分分析,以评估整体工艺效率和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书