Automated waterbird detection, classification, and mapping from UAV imagery using a two-stage deep learning pipeline

IF 8.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecological Informatics Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103949
Miel Bogaert, Andrée De Cock, Xingzhen Liu, Long Ho, Wouter H. Maes, Peter L.M. Goethals
{"title":"Automated waterbird detection, classification, and mapping from UAV imagery using a two-stage deep learning pipeline","authors":"Miel Bogaert,&nbsp;Andrée De Cock,&nbsp;Xingzhen Liu,&nbsp;Long Ho,&nbsp;Wouter H. Maes,&nbsp;Peter L.M. Goethals","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Waterbirds function as sensitive indicators of ecological change in freshwater ecosystems. Conventional monitoring is labour-intensive, spatially limited, prone to observer bias and disturbance. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery combined with deep learning (DL) offers a promising alternative for efficient and scalable monitoring.</div><div>This study evaluates a fully automated UAV-based workflow to detect, classify, and map waterbirds along a 12 km canal in Belgium. A two-stage pipeline combining YOLO-based detection and convolutional neural network (CNN) classification was developed and evaluated across varying flight altitudes and ground sampling distances (GSD). Model performance was further assessed using an independent seasonal dataset and analysed in relation to object size and habitat complexity. The detection model achieved a high precision of 0.91 and a recall of 0.81, while the classifier reached a weighted F1-score of 0.90. Detection performance was strongly dependent on ground sampling distance (GSD), with optimal results at ≤6.83 mm px<sup>−1</sup> (≤25 m altitude) and marked declines in detection performance at higher GSD values. Additional analyses showed that smaller birds were more likely to be missed, while high-entropy environments such as reed beds may further reduce detection reliability. Comparisons between automated and manual counts revealed discrepancies, influenced by environmental conditions and survey timing. Georeferenced detections projected onto orthomosaics enabled spatially explicit mapping of waterbird distribution.</div><div>Overall, UAV-based deep learning provides a promising and scalable approach for waterbird monitoring, while highlighting the importance of spatial resolution and habitat complexity in determining detection performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 103949"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954126003560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waterbirds function as sensitive indicators of ecological change in freshwater ecosystems. Conventional monitoring is labour-intensive, spatially limited, prone to observer bias and disturbance. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imagery combined with deep learning (DL) offers a promising alternative for efficient and scalable monitoring.
This study evaluates a fully automated UAV-based workflow to detect, classify, and map waterbirds along a 12 km canal in Belgium. A two-stage pipeline combining YOLO-based detection and convolutional neural network (CNN) classification was developed and evaluated across varying flight altitudes and ground sampling distances (GSD). Model performance was further assessed using an independent seasonal dataset and analysed in relation to object size and habitat complexity. The detection model achieved a high precision of 0.91 and a recall of 0.81, while the classifier reached a weighted F1-score of 0.90. Detection performance was strongly dependent on ground sampling distance (GSD), with optimal results at ≤6.83 mm px−1 (≤25 m altitude) and marked declines in detection performance at higher GSD values. Additional analyses showed that smaller birds were more likely to be missed, while high-entropy environments such as reed beds may further reduce detection reliability. Comparisons between automated and manual counts revealed discrepancies, influenced by environmental conditions and survey timing. Georeferenced detections projected onto orthomosaics enabled spatially explicit mapping of waterbird distribution.
Overall, UAV-based deep learning provides a promising and scalable approach for waterbird monitoring, while highlighting the importance of spatial resolution and habitat complexity in determining detection performance.

Abstract Image

使用两阶段深度学习管道的无人机图像自动水鸟检测,分类和映射
水鸟是淡水生态系统生态变化的敏感指标。传统的监测是劳动密集型的,空间有限的,容易受到观察者的偏见和干扰。无人机(UAV)图像与深度学习(DL)相结合,为高效和可扩展的监控提供了一种有前途的替代方案。本研究评估了一种基于无人机的全自动工作流程,用于检测、分类和绘制比利时12公里运河上的水鸟。开发了一种结合基于yolo的检测和卷积神经网络(CNN)分类的两级管道,并在不同飞行高度和地面采样距离(GSD)下进行了评估。使用独立的季节数据集进一步评估了模型的性能,并分析了与目标大小和栖息地复杂性的关系。检测模型的准确率为0.91,召回率为0.81,分类器的加权f1得分为0.90。检测性能强烈依赖于地面采样距离(GSD),在≤6.83 mm px−1(≤25 m高度)时效果最佳,而GSD值越高,检测性能下降越明显。其他分析表明,较小的鸟类更有可能被遗漏,而芦苇床等高熵环境可能会进一步降低检测的可靠性。自动计数和人工计数之间的比较揭示了受环境条件和调查时间影响的差异。投影到正形图上的地理参考检测使水鸟分布的空间显式映射成为可能。总体而言,基于无人机的深度学习为水鸟监测提供了一种有前途且可扩展的方法,同时强调了空间分辨率和栖息地复杂性在确定检测性能方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书