Margaret G. O'Connell, Kathleen Smith, Mike Wiggins Jr., Marvin DeFoe Shingwe Bines Name Clan, James Rasmussen, Esteban Chiriboga, Michael Waasegiizhig Price, Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya, Jennifer B. Dunn
{"title":"Improving risk and impact assessments via sustainability guidance from Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin (Anishinaabe-specific Indigenous Knowledge)","authors":"Margaret G. O'Connell, Kathleen Smith, Mike Wiggins Jr., Marvin DeFoe Shingwe Bines Name Clan, James Rasmussen, Esteban Chiriboga, Michael Waasegiizhig Price, Kimberly R. Marion Suiseeya, Jennifer B. Dunn","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many critical minerals underpinning green energy technologies are disproportionately located on or near Indigenous lands. Hence, there is a risk that an improperly managed green energy transition will violate Indigenous rights, thereby mirroring the extractive harms of current fossil fuel-based systems. There is a need to understand the capacity for current decision-making processes to engage with Indigenous Knowledge and uphold Indigenous rights. Several forms of impact assessment, risk assessment, and systems analysis exist to inform permitting, policymaking, and other decision-making processes. Here, we evaluate 18 such assessments to identify risks of Indigenous sovereignty violation. Contextualizing each aspect of our analysis within Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin (Anishinaabe-specific Indigenous Knowledge), we conduct a thematic analysis of over 50 assessment protocol sources in parallel with teachings shared by Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin holders. The teachings of Asemaa, Ma'iingan, and the Seventh Fire Prophecy emphasize consent, connection, and kinship as tenets of sustainability. Yet we find that consultation-based, often ambiguous participation protocols risk undermining consensus-building. Additionally, complex connections between assessments bely methods that isolate elements of sustainability in contradiction to Anishinaabe teachings of intertwined human and ecological well-being. Our analysis culminates in recommendations for co-developing more comprehensive, sovereignty-affirming assessment processes. The implementation of these recommendations will vary across contexts; however, the structure of our analysis provides a broadly applicable example of collaborative research that bridges knowledge systems. As depicted in the Seventh Fire Prophecy, we stand at a sustainability crossroads; ultimately, our analysis seeks to improve assessment protocols and guide decision making toward a more sustainable path.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104755"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629626002264","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many critical minerals underpinning green energy technologies are disproportionately located on or near Indigenous lands. Hence, there is a risk that an improperly managed green energy transition will violate Indigenous rights, thereby mirroring the extractive harms of current fossil fuel-based systems. There is a need to understand the capacity for current decision-making processes to engage with Indigenous Knowledge and uphold Indigenous rights. Several forms of impact assessment, risk assessment, and systems analysis exist to inform permitting, policymaking, and other decision-making processes. Here, we evaluate 18 such assessments to identify risks of Indigenous sovereignty violation. Contextualizing each aspect of our analysis within Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin (Anishinaabe-specific Indigenous Knowledge), we conduct a thematic analysis of over 50 assessment protocol sources in parallel with teachings shared by Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin holders. The teachings of Asemaa, Ma'iingan, and the Seventh Fire Prophecy emphasize consent, connection, and kinship as tenets of sustainability. Yet we find that consultation-based, often ambiguous participation protocols risk undermining consensus-building. Additionally, complex connections between assessments bely methods that isolate elements of sustainability in contradiction to Anishinaabe teachings of intertwined human and ecological well-being. Our analysis culminates in recommendations for co-developing more comprehensive, sovereignty-affirming assessment processes. The implementation of these recommendations will vary across contexts; however, the structure of our analysis provides a broadly applicable example of collaborative research that bridges knowledge systems. As depicted in the Seventh Fire Prophecy, we stand at a sustainability crossroads; ultimately, our analysis seeks to improve assessment protocols and guide decision making toward a more sustainable path.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.