The effectiveness of extended reality training programmes for improving psychomotor skill performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 10.3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100824
Samuel P. Bateman, G.J. Melendez-Torres, David J. Harris, Gavin Buckingham, Mark Wilson, Sam J. Vine
{"title":"The effectiveness of extended reality training programmes for improving psychomotor skill performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Samuel P. Bateman,&nbsp;G.J. Melendez-Torres,&nbsp;David J. Harris,&nbsp;Gavin Buckingham,&nbsp;Mark Wilson,&nbsp;Sam J. Vine","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organisations are increasingly implementing extended reality (XR) in education, organisational training, and sports practice. However, the effectiveness of XR compared to conventional training methods, and the potential improvements that additional sensory information, such as haptic feedback, may offer are unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared XR with non-XR training programmes in improving psychomotor skill performance (RQ1), assessed whether haptic feedback improved programmes’ effectiveness, and investigated the associations between methodological and technological design features on performance outcomes (RQ2, RQ3). Eight databases were searched on June 30th, 2025, for randomised controlled trials quantitatively measuring task performance of a psychomotor skill after an XR-based training programme. Sensitivity analyses, publication bias and risk of bias were assessed. Due to non-independence of effect sizes, robust variance meta-regression (RVEMR) models were run and presented using forest plots. Seventy-eight reports were assessed, totalling 3546 participants. Both the post-training scores and pre-post-training change scores between XR and non-XR groups were assessed. Two RVEMR models were created by splitting the control groups into two types: passive (no training) and active (non-XR training). Both models found statistically significant positive effects of XR training over non-XR training on task performance. No explanatory variables were found to be consistently associated with task performance, although haptic feedback showed a consistent, non-significant negative effect on task performance. Evidence certainty was limited by high methodological heterogeneity, low-moderate risk of bias, and poor methods reporting. Overall, XR-based training generally appears to be beneficial for training psychomotor skills over and above conventional training. Further research into the role of haptic feedback and other potential predictive variables in performance outcomes is warranted. Researchers are also advised to improve methodological reporting to aid future evidence syntheses in this research area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"52 ","pages":"Article 100824"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X26000631","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organisations are increasingly implementing extended reality (XR) in education, organisational training, and sports practice. However, the effectiveness of XR compared to conventional training methods, and the potential improvements that additional sensory information, such as haptic feedback, may offer are unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared XR with non-XR training programmes in improving psychomotor skill performance (RQ1), assessed whether haptic feedback improved programmes’ effectiveness, and investigated the associations between methodological and technological design features on performance outcomes (RQ2, RQ3). Eight databases were searched on June 30th, 2025, for randomised controlled trials quantitatively measuring task performance of a psychomotor skill after an XR-based training programme. Sensitivity analyses, publication bias and risk of bias were assessed. Due to non-independence of effect sizes, robust variance meta-regression (RVEMR) models were run and presented using forest plots. Seventy-eight reports were assessed, totalling 3546 participants. Both the post-training scores and pre-post-training change scores between XR and non-XR groups were assessed. Two RVEMR models were created by splitting the control groups into two types: passive (no training) and active (non-XR training). Both models found statistically significant positive effects of XR training over non-XR training on task performance. No explanatory variables were found to be consistently associated with task performance, although haptic feedback showed a consistent, non-significant negative effect on task performance. Evidence certainty was limited by high methodological heterogeneity, low-moderate risk of bias, and poor methods reporting. Overall, XR-based training generally appears to be beneficial for training psychomotor skills over and above conventional training. Further research into the role of haptic feedback and other potential predictive variables in performance outcomes is warranted. Researchers are also advised to improve methodological reporting to aid future evidence syntheses in this research area.
扩展现实训练方案对提高精神运动技能表现的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
组织越来越多地在教育、组织培训和体育实践中实施扩展现实(XR)。然而,与传统训练方法相比,XR的有效性以及额外的感官信息(如触觉反馈)可能提供的潜在改进尚不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了XR和非XR训练计划在提高精神运动技能表现(RQ1)方面的效果,评估了触觉反馈是否提高了计划的有效性,并调查了方法和技术设计特征对表现结果的关系(RQ2, RQ3)。研究人员于2025年6月30日检索了8个数据库,以进行随机对照试验,定量测量一项基于xr的训练项目后精神运动技能的任务表现。评估敏感性分析、发表偏倚和偏倚风险。由于效应大小的非独立性,稳健方差元回归(RVEMR)模型使用森林图运行和呈现。评估了78份报告,共有3546名参与者。评估XR组和非XR组的训练后得分和训练前后变化得分。通过将对照组分为被动(无训练)和主动(无xr训练)两种类型,建立了两个RVEMR模型。两种模型均发现,XR训练对任务绩效的正向影响在统计学上显著高于非XR训练。虽然触觉反馈对任务表现有一致的、不显著的负面影响,但没有发现与任务表现一致的解释变量。证据确定性受到方法学异质性高、中低偏倚风险和不良方法报告的限制。总的来说,基于xr的训练通常比传统训练更有利于训练精神运动技能。进一步研究触觉反馈和其他潜在的预测变量在性能结果中的作用是必要的。研究人员还被建议改进方法学报告,以帮助该研究领域未来的证据综合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书