Ecosystem services in miombo woodlands: challenges and opportunities to advance policy-relevant research

IF 3.6 Q1 FORESTRY
Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101406
Helder Manjate, Natasha Ribeiro, Francisco Moreira, Angela Lomba
{"title":"Ecosystem services in miombo woodlands: challenges and opportunities to advance policy-relevant research","authors":"Helder Manjate,&nbsp;Natasha Ribeiro,&nbsp;Francisco Moreira,&nbsp;Angela Lomba","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over time, African communities had a close relationship with miombo woodlands, a socio-ecological system providing key ecosystem services (ES) supporting the livelihoods of &gt;100 million people. Charcoal production and agriculture led to deforestation and forest degradation, contributing to the erosion of ES provided by miombo woodlands. While studies assessing ES across time and space have been published, assessments specifically targeting miombo woodlands are scarce. To synthesize research assessing ES provided by miombo woodlands a systematic review was developed, including methods and indicators used for ES evaluation. Overall, results show that publications have increased over time (2000–2024), with Tanzania, Mozambique and Zambia as the main geographical areas of the publications assessed. The majority of the publications focused on provisioning services (food supply, wood fuels, raw materials and timber), followed by regulation and maintenance services (climate regulation and soil quality), and cultural services (scientific research and heritage). Modelling and mapping and forest inventories and/or field assessments were used to assess biophysical processes, while interviews, focus group discussions were methods applied to assess cultural ES. Wood biomass and volume, forest products, and edible plant records were pinpointed as indicators used to quantify forest products provided. Wood and soil carbon stock and soil nutrient stock were identified as applied to quantify the carbon in wood, grass and soil and the nutrients in the soil. An asymmetric distribution of research on ES in the miombo woodlands was observed, suggesting knowledge gaps between countries that may influence policies and labels for natural resource management. Based on the evidence synthesised, we propose a conceptual framework that integrates research priorities, ES assessment, and policy applications to guide future research and the sustainable management of miombo woodlands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101406"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719326002591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over time, African communities had a close relationship with miombo woodlands, a socio-ecological system providing key ecosystem services (ES) supporting the livelihoods of >100 million people. Charcoal production and agriculture led to deforestation and forest degradation, contributing to the erosion of ES provided by miombo woodlands. While studies assessing ES across time and space have been published, assessments specifically targeting miombo woodlands are scarce. To synthesize research assessing ES provided by miombo woodlands a systematic review was developed, including methods and indicators used for ES evaluation. Overall, results show that publications have increased over time (2000–2024), with Tanzania, Mozambique and Zambia as the main geographical areas of the publications assessed. The majority of the publications focused on provisioning services (food supply, wood fuels, raw materials and timber), followed by regulation and maintenance services (climate regulation and soil quality), and cultural services (scientific research and heritage). Modelling and mapping and forest inventories and/or field assessments were used to assess biophysical processes, while interviews, focus group discussions were methods applied to assess cultural ES. Wood biomass and volume, forest products, and edible plant records were pinpointed as indicators used to quantify forest products provided. Wood and soil carbon stock and soil nutrient stock were identified as applied to quantify the carbon in wood, grass and soil and the nutrients in the soil. An asymmetric distribution of research on ES in the miombo woodlands was observed, suggesting knowledge gaps between countries that may influence policies and labels for natural resource management. Based on the evidence synthesised, we propose a conceptual framework that integrates research priorities, ES assessment, and policy applications to guide future research and the sustainable management of miombo woodlands.
miombo林地生态系统服务:促进政策相关研究的挑战与机遇
随着时间的推移,非洲社区与miombo林地建立了密切的关系,miombo林地是一个社会生态系统,提供关键的生态系统服务(ES),支持1亿人的生计。木炭生产和农业导致了森林砍伐和森林退化,造成了由miombo林地提供的ES的侵蚀。虽然已经发表了跨时间和空间评估ES的研究,但专门针对miombo林地的评估很少。为综合评价miombo林地生态系统的研究成果,对其评价方法和指标进行了系统综述。总体而言,结果表明,随着时间的推移(2000-2024年),出版物数量有所增加,坦桑尼亚、莫桑比克和赞比亚是被评估出版物的主要地理区域。大多数出版物侧重于供应服务(粮食供应、木材燃料、原材料和木材),其次是管理和维护服务(气候调节和土壤质量)以及文化服务(科学研究和遗产)。建模和制图、森林清查和/或实地评估用于评估生物物理过程,而访谈、焦点小组讨论是评估文化生态系统的方法。木材生物量和体积、林产品和可食用植物记录被确定为量化所提供林产品的指标。确定了木材和土壤碳储量和土壤养分储量,用于量化木材、草和土壤中的碳以及土壤中的养分。观察到,在miombo林地中关于生态系统的研究分布不对称,这表明各国之间的知识差距可能影响自然资源管理的政策和标签。在综合证据的基础上,我们提出了一个整合研究重点、ES评估和政策应用的概念框架,以指导未来的研究和森林的可持续管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书