Isaac G. Musaazi, Lauren B. Stadler, Jeseth Delgado Vela
{"title":"Quantifying Resilience and Sustainability of Different Plant Operations at a Wastewater Plant Experiencing Wet Weather","authors":"Isaac G. Musaazi, Lauren B. Stadler, Jeseth Delgado Vela","doi":"10.1021/acsestengg.6c00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Water resource recovery facilities\r\n(WRRFs) face growing\r\nchallenges\r\nmaintaining stable nutrient removal under variable wet weather conditions.\r\nThis study evaluates those challenges using data from a five-stage\r\nBardenpho plant (7.5 MGD design capacity). Dynamic process simulation\r\nwas used to measure system response to hydraulic disturbances through\r\nthree resilience metrics: maximum performance reduction (<em>mpr</em>), recovery time (<em>t</em><sub><em>r</em></sub>), and recovery phase performance reduction (<em>rppr</em>). Life cycle assessment (LCA) was then applied to assess how different\r\noperational responses affect environmental impacts, focusing exclusively\r\non the liquid treatment train and excluding solids treatment processes.\r\nThe results showed that direct N<sub>2</sub>O emissions dominated\r\nthe plant carbon footprint within this system boundary, exceeding\r\nCH<sub>4</sub> contributions by several orders of magnitude. Wet weather\r\nprolonged recovery times to about 6 days and raised global warming\r\nand eutrophication impacts by 20–60%. Flow equalization improved\r\nresilience by shortening recovery time and lowering environmental\r\nburdens by up to 40% through more stable hydraulic loading and reduced\r\naeration demand. Chemical addition further improved nutrient removal\r\nbut created additional upstream impacts from reagent production. Overall,\r\nresilience and environmental sustainability were not always aligned;\r\nthe plant could maintain stable performance (low <em>mpr</em>) while still generating higher indirect emissions. These findings\r\nsupport the development of nutrient management strategies that balance\r\noperational stability with environmental sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7008,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T engineering","volume":"6 6","pages":"1797–1808"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestengg.6c00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water resource recovery facilities
(WRRFs) face growing
challenges
maintaining stable nutrient removal under variable wet weather conditions.
This study evaluates those challenges using data from a five-stage
Bardenpho plant (7.5 MGD design capacity). Dynamic process simulation
was used to measure system response to hydraulic disturbances through
three resilience metrics: maximum performance reduction (mpr), recovery time (tr), and recovery phase performance reduction (rppr). Life cycle assessment (LCA) was then applied to assess how different
operational responses affect environmental impacts, focusing exclusively
on the liquid treatment train and excluding solids treatment processes.
The results showed that direct N2O emissions dominated
the plant carbon footprint within this system boundary, exceeding
CH4 contributions by several orders of magnitude. Wet weather
prolonged recovery times to about 6 days and raised global warming
and eutrophication impacts by 20–60%. Flow equalization improved
resilience by shortening recovery time and lowering environmental
burdens by up to 40% through more stable hydraulic loading and reduced
aeration demand. Chemical addition further improved nutrient removal
but created additional upstream impacts from reagent production. Overall,
resilience and environmental sustainability were not always aligned;
the plant could maintain stable performance (low mpr) while still generating higher indirect emissions. These findings
support the development of nutrient management strategies that balance
operational stability with environmental sustainability.
期刊介绍:
ACS ES&T Engineering publishes impactful research and review articles across all realms of environmental technology and engineering, employing a rigorous peer-review process. As a specialized journal, it aims to provide an international platform for research and innovation, inviting contributions on materials technologies, processes, data analytics, and engineering systems that can effectively manage, protect, and remediate air, water, and soil quality, as well as treat wastes and recover resources.
The journal encourages research that supports informed decision-making within complex engineered systems and is grounded in mechanistic science and analytics, describing intricate environmental engineering systems. It considers papers presenting novel advancements, spanning from laboratory discovery to field-based application. However, case or demonstration studies lacking significant scientific advancements and technological innovations are not within its scope.
Contributions containing experimental and/or theoretical methods, rooted in engineering principles and integrated with knowledge from other disciplines, are welcomed.