Palliative Extubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study of Timing, Prior Expressions of Will, Sedation, and Outcomes.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2026-06-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26892820261452090
Rodolfo Moraes Silva, Francielem Guglielmo Vilela, Marília Adler Galvão da Silva, Luisa Gabrielly Silva Israel, Melissa Perin
{"title":"Palliative Extubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study of Timing, Prior Expressions of Will, Sedation, and Outcomes.","authors":"Rodolfo Moraes Silva, Francielem Guglielmo Vilela, Marília Adler Galvão da Silva, Luisa Gabrielly Silva Israel, Melissa Perin","doi":"10.1177/26892820261452090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize palliative extubation (PE) as a clinical and ethical process in critically ill patients in a public hospital in Brazil, focusing on timing of palliative care (PC) involvement, shared decision-making, symptom management, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included adult patients who underwent PE between January 2022 and December 2024. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional PC database and medical records. Variables included demographics, comorbidities, functional status, reasons for intubation, timing of PC consultation, family conferences, opioid use, palliative sedation, and outcomes. Descriptive analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 447 patients evaluated by the PC team, 122 (27.3%) underwent PE. The mean age was 69.7 years, and 51.6% were female. Half had a Palliative Performance Scale score ≤60 before admission. The mean time from hospital admission to PC consultation was 8.3 days. Family conferences were conducted in all cases (mean: 1.5 per patient), and extubation occurred within three days of the conference in 92.6%. Opioids were used in 77.0% of patients, predominantly morphine; palliative sedation was required in 21.3%, always with midazolam. In-hospital mortality was 91.8%, while 8.2% were discharged. Among deaths, 50% occurred on the same day as extubation, whereas others survived from hours to 31 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort, PE was integrated into a structured, family-centered process involving interdisciplinary consensus and individualized symptom management. The variability in survival after extubation supports its interpretation as withdrawal of disproportionate treatment rather than an intervention intended to hasten death, underscoring the importance of early PC integration in intensive care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"7 ","pages":"26892820261452090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13422731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26892820261452090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize palliative extubation (PE) as a clinical and ethical process in critically ill patients in a public hospital in Brazil, focusing on timing of palliative care (PC) involvement, shared decision-making, symptom management, and outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included adult patients who underwent PE between January 2022 and December 2024. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional PC database and medical records. Variables included demographics, comorbidities, functional status, reasons for intubation, timing of PC consultation, family conferences, opioid use, palliative sedation, and outcomes. Descriptive analyses were performed.

Results: Among 447 patients evaluated by the PC team, 122 (27.3%) underwent PE. The mean age was 69.7 years, and 51.6% were female. Half had a Palliative Performance Scale score ≤60 before admission. The mean time from hospital admission to PC consultation was 8.3 days. Family conferences were conducted in all cases (mean: 1.5 per patient), and extubation occurred within three days of the conference in 92.6%. Opioids were used in 77.0% of patients, predominantly morphine; palliative sedation was required in 21.3%, always with midazolam. In-hospital mortality was 91.8%, while 8.2% were discharged. Among deaths, 50% occurred on the same day as extubation, whereas others survived from hours to 31 days.

Conclusions: In this cohort, PE was integrated into a structured, family-centered process involving interdisciplinary consensus and individualized symptom management. The variability in survival after extubation supports its interpretation as withdrawal of disproportionate treatment rather than an intervention intended to hasten death, underscoring the importance of early PC integration in intensive care settings.

危重病人的姑息拔管:时间、先前意志表达、镇静和结果的回顾性研究。
目的:将姑息拔管(PE)作为巴西一家公立医院危重患者的临床和伦理过程进行表征,重点关注姑息治疗(PC)参与的时机、共同决策、症状管理和结果。方法:这项回顾性横断面研究纳入了2022年1月至2024年12月期间接受PE治疗的成年患者。数据来自一个前瞻性维护的机构PC数据库和医疗记录。变量包括人口统计学、合并症、功能状态、插管原因、PC咨询时间、家庭会议、阿片类药物使用、姑息性镇静和结果。进行描述性分析。结果:在PC小组评估的447例患者中,122例(27.3%)接受了PE。平均年龄69.7岁,女性占51.6%。半数患者入院前姑息治疗表现量表评分≤60分。从入院到PC会诊的平均时间为8.3天。所有病例都进行了家庭会议(平均每位患者1.5次),92.6%的病例在会议后三天内拔管。77.0%的患者使用阿片类药物,以吗啡为主;21.3%的患者需要姑息性镇静,通常使用咪达唑仑。住院死亡率为91.8%,出院率为8.2%。在死亡病例中,50%发生在拔管当天,而其他病例存活数小时至31天。结论:在这个队列中,PE被整合到一个结构化的、以家庭为中心的过程中,涉及跨学科共识和个体化症状管理。拔管后存活率的可变性支持其解释为撤销不成比例的治疗,而不是旨在加速死亡的干预,强调了在重症监护环境中早期PC整合的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书