Mapping outcomes in randomised radiology trials: Protocol for a scoping review.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601261473871
Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Christoph Felix Müller, Martin Lundsgaard Hansen, Mia Kolmos, Simona Gentile, Lea Marie Pehrson, Cecilie Juul Mørck Offersen, Silvia Ingala, Lars Birger Lönn
{"title":"Mapping outcomes in randomised radiology trials: Protocol for a scoping review.","authors":"Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Christoph Felix Müller, Martin Lundsgaard Hansen, Mia Kolmos, Simona Gentile, Lea Marie Pehrson, Cecilie Juul Mørck Offersen, Silvia Ingala, Lars Birger Lönn","doi":"10.1177/20584601261473871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This scoping review aims to systematically map how outcomes are defined and operationalised in contemporary radiological randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The findings will inform a subsequent Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for clinical studies in radiology, including adaptive platform trials (APTs), conventional RCTs, and observational studies.</p><p><strong>Methods including end points: </strong>The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with PRISMA-P and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and will encompass articles published from 1 January 2023 in select high-impact general medical and radiological journals, using a search strategy developed and vetted by an independent information specialist. The search strategy yielded 4,202 hits on 7 April 2026. All steps, from screening through data extraction, will be done in duplicate by two independent authors. Extracted trial data will include number of trial sites, number of participants, sub-speciality, intervention type, and interventions under study. For each outcome in each trial, we will extract the name and type of the outcome, operationalisation/definition/tool used, assessment of temporality (e.g. truncation, censoring, repeated sampling), missingness proportion, missingness handling, effect quantification, and statistical analyses of effects (e.g. unadjusted or regression-model based). Data extraction will start with a 10-trial pilot phase for maximised data quality. Data synthesis will be descriptive without risk of bias evaluation.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This scoping review will map how outcomes are defined and operationalised in contemporary radiological RCTs and inform a Delphi process to identify core outcomes for APTs and RCTs, supporting the advancement of value-based radiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":"15 6","pages":"20584601261473871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13424935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601261473871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This scoping review aims to systematically map how outcomes are defined and operationalised in contemporary radiological randomised clinical trials (RCTs). The findings will inform a subsequent Delphi process to develop a core outcome set for clinical studies in radiology, including adaptive platform trials (APTs), conventional RCTs, and observational studies.

Methods including end points: The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with PRISMA-P and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and will encompass articles published from 1 January 2023 in select high-impact general medical and radiological journals, using a search strategy developed and vetted by an independent information specialist. The search strategy yielded 4,202 hits on 7 April 2026. All steps, from screening through data extraction, will be done in duplicate by two independent authors. Extracted trial data will include number of trial sites, number of participants, sub-speciality, intervention type, and interventions under study. For each outcome in each trial, we will extract the name and type of the outcome, operationalisation/definition/tool used, assessment of temporality (e.g. truncation, censoring, repeated sampling), missingness proportion, missingness handling, effect quantification, and statistical analyses of effects (e.g. unadjusted or regression-model based). Data extraction will start with a 10-trial pilot phase for maximised data quality. Data synthesis will be descriptive without risk of bias evaluation.

Implications: This scoping review will map how outcomes are defined and operationalised in contemporary radiological RCTs and inform a Delphi process to identify core outcomes for APTs and RCTs, supporting the advancement of value-based radiology.

随机放射学试验的结果映射:范围审查方案。
本综述旨在系统地描绘当代放射学随机临床试验(rct)的结果是如何定义和操作的。这些发现将为随后的德尔菲过程提供信息,以制定放射学临床研究的核心结果集,包括适应性平台试验(APTs)、传统随机对照试验和观察性研究。包括终点在内的方法:范围审查将根据PRISMA-P和PRISMA-ScR指南进行,并将包括2023年1月1日起在选定的高影响力普通医学和放射学期刊上发表的文章,使用由独立信息专家制定和审查的搜索策略。该搜索策略在2026年4月7日产生了4202个结果。从筛选到数据提取的所有步骤,将由两位独立作者完成一式两份。提取的试验数据将包括试验地点的数量、参与者的数量、亚专科、干预类型和正在研究的干预措施。对于每个试验的每个结果,我们将提取结果的名称和类型、操作化/定义/使用的工具、时间性评估(例如截断、审查、重复抽样)、缺失比例、缺失处理、效果量化和效果的统计分析(例如未调整或基于回归模型)。数据提取将从10个试验试点阶段开始,以最大限度地提高数据质量。数据综合将是描述性的,没有偏倚评价的风险。意义:该范围综述将绘制出当代放射学随机对照试验中如何定义和实施结果,并为德尔菲过程提供信息,以确定apt和随机对照试验的核心结果,支持基于价值的放射学的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书