A Delphi-guided development and validation of a comprehensive auditory attention assessment tool (C-AAAT).

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Prajwal Kumar Eranna, Jayashree S Bhat, Darshan Hosaholalu Sarvajna
{"title":"A Delphi-guided development and validation of a comprehensive auditory attention assessment tool (C-AAAT).","authors":"Prajwal Kumar Eranna, Jayashree S Bhat, Darshan Hosaholalu Sarvajna","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2026.2710179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efficient everyday communication depends on the ability to sustain, selectively allocate, and inhibit auditory attention, particularly in multi-talker environments. Despite its clinical importance, standardized tools that assess attention across multiple stimulus levels are limited, especially within the auditory domain and the Indian context. The study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive auditory attention assessment tool (C-AAAT) in Malayalam using a Delphi-guided framework. In Phase I, expert consensus established the need for the tool and guided its conceptualization, resulting in five subsections: syllable, word, nonword, discourse, and nonverbal stimuli. Content validation demonstrated strong relevance and clarity, with all items exceeding accepted content validity index thresholds, and pilot testing confirmed feasibility and ease of administration. In Phase II, the C-AAAT was administered to 67 younger adults (18-25 years) and 57 older adults (55-70 years) with normal hearing and no cognitive impairment. Outcome measures included accuracy, impulsivity, inattention, and response time. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the coherent internal structure. Mann-Whitney U, Friedman's test, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses and intraclass-correlation demonstrated sensitivity to age-related and subsection-wise differences, along with good to excellent test-retest reliability. These findings provide preliminary evidence of tool's validity and potential utility in assessing auditory attention among Indian-context.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2026.2710179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Efficient everyday communication depends on the ability to sustain, selectively allocate, and inhibit auditory attention, particularly in multi-talker environments. Despite its clinical importance, standardized tools that assess attention across multiple stimulus levels are limited, especially within the auditory domain and the Indian context. The study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive auditory attention assessment tool (C-AAAT) in Malayalam using a Delphi-guided framework. In Phase I, expert consensus established the need for the tool and guided its conceptualization, resulting in five subsections: syllable, word, nonword, discourse, and nonverbal stimuli. Content validation demonstrated strong relevance and clarity, with all items exceeding accepted content validity index thresholds, and pilot testing confirmed feasibility and ease of administration. In Phase II, the C-AAAT was administered to 67 younger adults (18-25 years) and 57 older adults (55-70 years) with normal hearing and no cognitive impairment. Outcome measures included accuracy, impulsivity, inattention, and response time. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the coherent internal structure. Mann-Whitney U, Friedman's test, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses and intraclass-correlation demonstrated sensitivity to age-related and subsection-wise differences, along with good to excellent test-retest reliability. These findings provide preliminary evidence of tool's validity and potential utility in assessing auditory attention among Indian-context.

delphi引导下的综合听觉注意评估工具(C-AAAT)的开发与验证。
有效的日常沟通取决于维持、选择性分配和抑制听觉注意力的能力,特别是在多说话的环境中。尽管具有临床重要性,但评估多重刺激水平注意力的标准化工具是有限的,特别是在听觉领域和印度环境中。本研究旨在使用delphi引导框架开发并验证马拉雅拉姆语综合听觉注意评估工具(C-AAAT)。在第一阶段,专家共识确立了对该工具的需求,并指导了其概念化,产生了五个子部分:音节、单词、非单词、话语和非语言刺激。内容验证显示了很强的相关性和清晰度,所有项目都超过了可接受的内容有效性指数阈值,并且试点测试确认了可行性和易于管理。在第二阶段,对67名18-25岁的年轻人和57名55-70岁的老年人进行C-AAAT治疗,这些人听力正常,没有认知障碍。结果测量包括准确性、冲动性、注意力不集中和反应时间。探索性因子分析证实了内部结构的一致性。Mann-Whitney U、Friedman检验、逻辑回归、受试者工作特征分析和类内相关性显示出对年龄相关和亚组相关差异的敏感性,以及良好到优异的重测信度。这些发现提供了初步的证据,证明工具的有效性和潜在的效用,以评估听觉注意在印度语境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书